Optimization of automation: III. Development of optimization method for determining automation rate in nuclear power plants

Abstract Automation has been introduced in various industries, including the nuclear field, because it is commonly believed that automation promises greater efficiency, lower workloads, and fewer operator errors through reducing operator errors and enhancing operator and system performance. However, the excessive introduction of automation has deteriorated operator performance due to the side effects of automation, which are referred to as Out-of-the-Loop (OOTL), and this is critical issue that must be resolved. Thus, in order to determine the optimal level of automation introduction that assures the best human operator performance, a quantitative method of optimizing the automation is proposed in this paper. In order to propose the optimization method for determining appropriate automation levels that enable the best human performance, the automation rate and ostracism rate, which are estimation methods that quantitatively analyze the positive and negative effects of automation, respectively, are integrated. The integration was conducted in order to derive the shortest working time through considering the concept of situation awareness recovery (SAR), which states that the automation rate with the shortest working time assures the best human performance. The process to derive the optimized automation rate is demonstrated through an emergency operation scenario-based case study. In this case study, four types of procedures are assumed through redesigning the original emergency operating procedure according to the introduced automation and ostracism levels. Using the derivation process, the optimized automation rate is estimated through integrating the automation rate and ostracism rate according to the decreasing rate of working time. The automation rate that induces the most decreased rate of working time is calculated, and it is explained that the estimated automation rate is the optimized automation rate that provides the best operator performance for the circumstances. It is expected that the proposed automation rate optimization method will be useful in introducing automation with assurance of the best human performance.

[1]  Arye R. Ephrath,et al.  Monitoring vs. Man-in-the-Loop Detection of Aircraft Control Failures , 1981 .

[2]  Kee-Choon Kwon,et al.  Development of advanced I&C in nuclear power plants: ADIOS and ASICS , 2001 .

[3]  M R Endsley,et al.  Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[4]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Situation Awareness Recovery , 2014, Hum. Factors.

[5]  David B. Kaber,et al.  The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task , 2004 .

[6]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Out‐of‐the‐loop performance problems and the use of intermediate levels of automation for improved control system functioning and safety , 1997 .

[7]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Failure Detection in Dynamic Systems , 1981 .

[8]  Poong Hyun Seong,et al.  Experimental Investigation into the Effects of Decision Support Systems on Operator Performance , 2009 .

[9]  Poong-Hyun Seong,et al.  A quantitative approach to modeling the information flow of diagnosis tasks in nuclear power plants , 2003, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  Hiroshi Furukawa,et al.  Operator's situation awareness under different levels of automation; evaluations through probabilistic human cognitive simulations , 2000, Smc 2000 conference proceedings. 2000 ieee international conference on systems, man and cybernetics. 'cybernetics evolving to systems, humans, organizations, and their complex interactions' (cat. no.0.

[11]  Poong Hyun Seong,et al.  Optimization of automation: II. Estimation method of ostracism rate based on the loss of situation awareness of human operators in nuclear power plants , 2015 .

[12]  Charles E. Billings,et al.  Aviation Automation: The Search for A Human-centered Approach , 1996 .

[13]  Stephen Fleger,et al.  Human-system Interfaces for Automatic Systems , 2010 .

[14]  Poong Hyun Seong,et al.  Investigation on relationship between information flow rate and mental workload of accident diagnosis tasks in NPPs , 2006 .

[15]  John D. Lee,et al.  Human Factors and Ergonomics in Automation Design , 2006 .

[16]  Poong Hyun Seong,et al.  Optimization of automation: I. Estimation method of cognitive automation rates reflecting the effects of automation on human operators in nuclear power plants , 2014 .

[17]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Human-Automation Interaction , 2005 .

[18]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Human and Computer Control of Undersea Teleoperators , 1978 .

[19]  Roger C. Conant,et al.  Laws of Information which Govern Systems , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[20]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  An introduction to human factors engineering , 1997 .