Personalized Integrated Care Promoting Quality of Life for Older People: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Background Alzheimer disease (AD) and Parkinson disease (PD) are the 2 most common neurodegenerative diseases affecting millions of people worldwide. The Personalized Integrated Care Promoting Quality of Life for Older People (PC4L) project proposes an integrated, scalable, and interactive care ecosystem that can be easily adapted to the needs of several neurodegenerative and chronic diseases, care institutions, and end user requirements. Objective The study protocol developed within the framework of the PC4L project aims to iteratively test the integrated platform and its modules, and focuses primarily on assessing the impact of the proposed solution (ie, the PC4L platform) on patients’ quality of life, as well as its usability and feasibility on a large-scale sample size in 3 different scenarios (home, neurorehabilitation, and day care centers). Methods A prospective multicenter clinical study is conducted in 5 European countries (Germany, Italy, Portugal, Romania, and Spain) at 6 different pilot centers, for 3 months, in patients with PD, Parkinsonism, AD, and other dementias (ODs). Patients were randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to the intervention group (use of the PC4L system) or the control group (no intervention). The PC4L system consists mainly of a wristband for monitoring parameters such as steps and levels of physical activity, and the PC4L app, which includes different engaging functionalities. Both groups are assessed through baseline and end-of-study clinical evaluations, including assessment of quality of life through the EQ-5D-3L scale. Results The study protocol is part of a project approved and funded by the European Commission Horizon 2020 (grant agreement number 875221). The ethics committees of all involved centers reviewed and approved the study protocol. The study began with the recruitment phase in September 2022, and enrollment ended in February 2023. Recruitment is now closed (April 2023). The results of this study are expected to be published in summer 2023. A total of 558 patients, 279 per study group, were recruited. The results will allow to clarify the impact of PC4L on quality of life, will assess the empowerment of patients and the medical resources use, as well as the usability of the final version of the PC4L system. It will also provide information on the support of the system as a tool to facilitate the decision-making process. Conclusions The PC4L project intends to test a technology-based, integrated, scalable, and interactive care platform on patients with neurodegenerative diseases and proposes a good coordinated care model between all involved actors. Future developments of the PC4L solution may involve caregivers and socio-health professionals in the decision-making process in order to facilitate efficient communication between all stakeholders and ensure reliable and protected access to data within Europe. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05538455; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05538455 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/47916

[1]  P. Tropea,et al.  End Users’ and Other Stakeholders’ Needs and Requirements in the Development of a Personalized Integrated Care Platform (PROCare4Life) for Older People With Dementia or Parkinson Disease: Mixed Methods Study , 2022, JMIR formative research.

[2]  P. Paruolo,et al.  Positive Externalities of EU Actions on Sustainability of Health Systems * , 2021, Contributions to Economic Analysis.

[3]  H. Becker,et al.  User-Centered Development of a Web Platform Supporting Community-Based Health Care Organizations for Older Persons in Need of Support: Qualitative Focus Group Study , 2020, Journal of medical Internet research.

[4]  B. Bloem,et al.  Personalized Care Management for Persons with Parkinson’s Disease , 2020, Journal of Parkinson's disease.

[5]  P. Tropea,et al.  Investigating the Needs and Requirements of Older People with Dementia or Parkinson disease, their Caregivers and Other Stakeholders in the Development of the Personalized Integrated Care Platform PROCare4Life: Protocol of a Mixed-Methods Study (Preprint) , 2020 .

[6]  L. Pendrill,et al.  A Questionnaire for Assessing User Satisfaction With Mobile Health Apps: Development Using Rasch Measurement Theory , 2020, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[7]  Walter Ricciardi,et al.  Public health digitalization in Europe , 2019, European journal of public health.

[8]  S. Conard Best practices in digital health literacy. , 2019, International journal of cardiology.

[9]  L. Lopiano,et al.  Telemedicine in Neurological Disorders: Opportunities and Challenges. , 2019, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[10]  Paolo Bonato,et al.  A roadmap for implementation of patient‐centered digital outcome measures in Parkinson's disease obtained using mobile health technologies , 2019, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[11]  Martin Knapp,et al.  Technology-based tools and services for people with dementia and carers: Mapping technology onto the dementia care pathway , 2019, Dementia.

[12]  Bastiaan R. Bloem,et al.  Management of Parkinson’s Disease 20 Years from Now: Towards Digital Health Pathways , 2018, Journal of Parkinson's Disease.

[13]  Mathieu F Janssen,et al.  Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life between People with Parkinson’s Disease and Non-Parkinson’s: Using Data Drawn from the ‘100 for Parkinson’s’ Smartphone-Based Prospective Study , 2018, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[14]  Yoshihiro Kokubo,et al.  Global, regional, and national burden of Parkinson's disease, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 , 2018, The Lancet Neurology.

[15]  W. Chen,et al.  Exercise-Induced Neuroprotection of the Nigrostriatal Dopamine System in Parkinson's Disease , 2017, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[16]  E. Bruera,et al.  The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System 25 Years Later: Past, Present, and Future Developments. , 2017, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[17]  Max A. Little,et al.  Technology in Parkinson's disease: Challenges and opportunities , 2016, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[18]  J. Daneault,et al.  The Effects of Physical Activity in Parkinson’s Disease: A Review , 2016, Journal of Parkinson's disease.

[19]  D. Allen,et al.  Remote Physical Activity Monitoring in Neurological Disease: A Systematic Review , 2016, PloS one.

[20]  M. I. Broese van Groenou,et al.  Providing informal care in a changing society , 2016, European journal of ageing.

[21]  Litia A. Carvalho,et al.  Neurotrophic factors in Parkinson's disease are regulated by exercise: Evidence-based practice , 2016, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[22]  S. McEwen,et al.  Exercise-enhanced neuroplasticity targeting motor and cognitive circuitry in Parkinson's disease , 2013, The Lancet Neurology.

[23]  David Moher,et al.  SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials , 2013, BMJ.

[24]  W. Oertel,et al.  QL2 Evaluation of Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Health-Related Quality of Life Scales in Parkinson'S Disease , 2012 .

[25]  Duncan J Macfarlane,et al.  Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): A systematic review , 2011, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[26]  Lynn Rochester,et al.  The pattern of habitual sedentary behavior is different in advanced Parkinson's disease , 2010, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[27]  L. Cardozo,et al.  Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse , 2010, International Urogynecology Journal.

[28]  Philip T. Kortum,et al.  Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale , 2009 .

[29]  P. Belafsky,et al.  Validity and Reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) , 2008, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[30]  B. Bloem,et al.  Evidence‐based analysis of physical therapy in Parkinson's disease with recommendations for practice and research , 2007, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[31]  A. Crizzle,et al.  Is Physical Exercise Beneficial for Persons with Parkinson's Disease? , 2006, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[32]  C. Mathers,et al.  Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study , 2005, The Lancet.

[33]  F. Rabiee Focus-group interview and data analysis , 2004, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society.

[34]  The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS): Status and recommendations , 2003, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[35]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[36]  R. Fishman Intracranial hypotension , 1994, Neurology.

[37]  T. Marteau,et al.  The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). , 1992, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[38]  Daniel J Buysse,et al.  The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research , 1989, Psychiatry Research.

[39]  C. Caspersen,et al.  Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. , 1985, Public health reports.

[40]  B. Linn,et al.  CUMULATIVE ILLNESS RATING SCALE , 1968, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[41]  A. Kramer,et al.  Be smart, exercise your heart: exercise effects on brain and cognition , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[42]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Impact of physical therapy for Parkinson's disease: a critical review of the literature. , 2007, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[43]  Frank de Charro,et al.  The Measurement and Valuation of Health Status Using EQ-5D: A European Perspective , 2003, Springer Netherlands.

[44]  B Cooper,et al.  Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.