Successive reversals of a discriminated preference for signaled tailshock

[1]  J. Harsh,et al.  A concurrent assessment of the positive and negative properties of a signaled shock schedule , 1974 .

[2]  G. Biederman,et al.  Preference-for-signaled-shock phenomenon: Effects of shock modifiability and light reinforcement. , 1973 .

[3]  P. Badia,et al.  The relative aversiveness of signalled vs unsignalled escapable and inescapable shock. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  C. C. Perkins.  An analysis of the concept of reinforcement. , 1968, Psychological review.

[5]  C. C. Perkins,et al.  Factors affecting preference for signal-shock over shock-signal. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  C. C. Perkins,et al.  Immediate vs. delayed shock in T-maze performance. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  W. F. Prokasy,et al.  The acquisition of observing responses in the absence of differential external reinforcement. , 1956, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[8]  C. C. Perkins.  The stimulus conditions which follow learned responses. , 1955, Psychological review.

[9]  J. Furedy,et al.  Signaling unmodifiable shocks: limits on human informational cognitive control. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Martin E. P. Seligman,et al.  Unpredictable and Uncontrollable Aversive Events , 1971 .

[11]  J. Lanzetta,et al.  Preference for information about an uncertain but unavoidable outcome. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  L. Wyckoff.  Toward a quantitative theory of secondary reinforcement. , 1959, Psychological review.