System Design Considerations for Undersea Networks: Link and Multiple Access Protocols

We address several inter-related aspects of underwater network design within the context of a cross-layer approach. We first highlight the impact of key characteristics of the acoustic propagation medium on the choice of link layer parameters; in turn, the consequences of these choices on design of a suitable MAC protocol and its performance are investigated. Specifically, the paper makes contributions on the following fronts: a) Based on accepted acoustic channel models, the pointto- point (link) capacity is numerically calculated, quantifying sensitivities to factors such as the sound speed profile, power spectral density of the (colored) additive background noise and the impact of boundary (surface) conditions for the acoustic channel; b) It provides an analysis of the Micromodem-like linklayer based on FH-FSK modulation; and finally c) it undertakes performance evaluation of a simple MAC protocol based on ALOHA with Random Backoff, that is shown to be particularly suitable for small underwater networks.

[1]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Frequency reuse underwater: capacity of an acoustic cellular network , 2007, Underwater Networks.

[2]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  A MAC protocol for ad-hoc underwater acoustic sensor networks , 2006, Underwater Networks.

[3]  Robert J. Urick,et al.  Principles of underwater sound , 1975 .

[4]  Rodney F. W. Coates,et al.  Underwater Acoustic Systems , 1990 .

[5]  R. Stephenson.  A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  J. Gibson,et al.  Incorporating Realistic Acoustic Propagation Models in Simulation of Underwater Acoustic Networks: A Statistical Approach , 2006, OCEANS 2006.

[7]  D. Jackson,et al.  High-Frequency Seafloor Acoustics , 2006 .

[8]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  On the relationship between capacity and distance in an underwater acoustic communication channel , 2006, Underwater Networks.

[9]  V. Rodoplu,et al.  An energy-efficient MAC protocol for underwater wireless acoustic networks , 2005, Proceedings of OCEANS 2005 MTS/IEEE.

[10]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Digital Communications , 1983 .

[11]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  On the relationship between capacity and distance in an underwater acoustic communication channel , 2007, MOCO.

[12]  Abbas Jamalipour,et al.  Wireless communications , 2005, GLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005..

[13]  S. Houcke,et al.  Power and distance based MAC algorithms for underwater acoustic networks , 2006, OCEANS 2006.

[14]  M. Porter,et al.  Gaussian beam tracing for computing ocean acoustic fields , 1987 .

[15]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Underwater Acoustic Communications and Networking: Recent Advances and Future Challenges , 2008 .

[16]  Paul Hursky,et al.  Effects of ocean thermocline variability on noncoherent underwater acoustic communications. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  M. Grund,et al.  The PLUSNet Underwater Communications System: Acoustic Telemetry for Undersea Surveillance , 2006, OCEANS 2006.

[18]  Lee Freitag,et al.  Integrated acoustic communication and navigation for multiple UUVs , 2001, MTS/IEEE Oceans 2001. An Ocean Odyssey. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37295).

[19]  S. Singh,et al.  The WHOI micro-modem: an acoustic communications and navigation system for multiple platforms , 2005, Proceedings of OCEANS 2005 MTS/IEEE.