Degradation of hydroxyapatite coating on a well-functioning femoral component.
暂无分享,去创建一个
H Stich | J. Theis | D. Schwenke | H. Stich | P Schawalder | N. Aebli | J. Krebs | P. Schawalder | N Aebli | J Krebs | D Schwenke | J C Theis
[1] T. Albrektsson,et al. Implant fixation improved by close fit. Cylindrical implant-bone interface studied in rabbits. , 1988, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.
[2] C. Bünger,et al. Role of different loading conditions on resorption of hydroxyapatite coating evaluated by histomorphometric and stereological methods , 1996, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.
[3] J. Ong,et al. Effect of protein on the dissolution of HA coatings. , 2000, Biomaterials.
[4] P. Delincé,et al. Two-year outcome of hydroxyapatite-coated prostheses. Two femoral prostheses retrieved at autopsy. , 1994, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.
[5] K. Søballe,et al. The current status of hydroxyapatite coating of prostheses. , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.
[6] R. Bloebaum,et al. Osteolysis from a press-fit hydroxyapatite-coated implant. A case study. , 1993, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[7] A. Tonino,et al. Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems. Histology and histomorphometry around five components retrieved at post mortem. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.
[8] S. Medendorp,et al. An indirect comparison of third-body wear in retrieved hydroxyapatite-coated, porous, and cemented femoral components. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[9] W. Capello,et al. Hydroxyapatite in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Clinical Results and Critical Issues , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[10] R. Geesink,et al. Six-year results of hydroxyapatite-coated total hip replacement. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.
[11] T. Bauer,et al. Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems. Histological analysis of components retrieved at autopsy. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[12] G W Blunn,et al. A comparison of bone remodelling around hydroxyapatite-coated, porous-coated and grit-blasted hip replacements retrieved at post-mortem. , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.
[13] W R Walsh,et al. Morphometric and mechanical evaluation of titanium implant integration: comparison of five surface structures. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.
[14] G. Böhm,et al. Histology of tissue adjacent to an HAC-coated femoral prosthesis. A case report. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.
[15] D Buser,et al. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. , 1991, Journal of biomedical materials research.
[16] K. Bachus,et al. Postmortem comparative analysis of titanium and hydroxyapatite porous-coated femoral implants retrieved from the same patient. A case study. , 1993, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[17] G. Vaes. Cellular biology and biochemical mechanism of bone resorption. A review of recent developments on the formation, activation, and mode of action of osteoclasts. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[18] L. Dorr,et al. Complications with hydroxyapatite particulate separation in total hip arthroplasty. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[19] The hydroxyapatite-ABG hip system: 5- to 7-year results from an international multicentre study. The International ABG Study Group. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[20] C. Klein,et al. Studies of the solubility of different calcium phosphate ceramic particles in vitro. , 1990, Biomaterials.