Animal Experiment of a Novel Neurointerventional Surgical Robotic System with Master-Slave Mode

In order to inspect and improve the system performance of the neuro-interventional surgical robot and its effectiveness and safety in clinical applications, we conducted ten animal experiments using this robotic system. Cerebral angiography was performed on ten experimental animals, and various mechanical performance indicators, operating time, X-ray radiation dosage to the experimental animals and the experimenter, and arterial damage in the experimental animals were recorded when the robotic system completed cerebral angiography. The results show that the robotic system can successfully complete the cerebral angiography surgery, and the mechanical performance is up to standard. The operating time is almost the same as the physician's operating time. And the mean X-ray radiation dosage received by the experimental animals and experimenter was 0.893 Gy and 0.0859 mSv, respectively. There were no complications associated with damage to the vascular endothelium. The robotic system can basically complete the relevant assessment indicators, and its system performance, effectiveness, and safety in clinical applications meet the standards, basically meeting the requirements of clinical applications of neurointerventional surgery.

[1]  Hugh Calkins,et al.  First experience with a novel robotic remote catheter system: Amigo™ mapping trial , 2013, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[2]  Mandeep Bhargava,et al.  Experience with the Hansen Robotic System for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation—Lessons Learned and Techniques Modified: Hansen in the Real World , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[3]  Nicholas S. Peters,et al.  Experience of robotic catheter ablation in humans using a novel remotely steerable catheter sheath , 2008, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[4]  R. Cury,et al.  View-Synchronized Robotic Image-Guided Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Experimental Validation and Clinical Feasibility , 2007, Circulation.

[5]  Donald L. Miller,et al.  OCCUPATIONAL RADIATION DOSES TO OPERATORS PERFORMING CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION PROCEDURES , 2008, Health physics.

[6]  V. Santinelli,et al.  Robotic magnetic navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  Mirko Schiemann,et al.  Vascular guide wire navigation with a magnetic guidance system: experimental results in a phantom. , 2004, Radiology.

[8]  B. Lindsay,et al.  Novel, Magnetically Guided Catheter for Endocardial Mapping and Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation , 2002, Circulation.

[9]  David F Kallmes,et al.  Complications of diagnostic cerebral angiography: evaluation of 19,826 consecutive patients. , 2007, Radiology.

[10]  A. Yousefy,et al.  Begin Again and Continue With Life: A Qualitative Study on the Experiences of Cardiac Rehabilitation Patients , 2017, The journal of nursing research : JNR.

[11]  Shuxiang Guo,et al.  Operating force information on-line acquisition of a novel slave manipulator for vascular interventional surgery , 2018, Biomedical microdevices.

[12]  W. Saliba,et al.  Worldwide Experience with the Robotic Navigation System in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Methodology, Efficacy and Safety , 2012, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[13]  W. Saliba,et al.  Novel Robotic Catheter Remote Control System: Feasibility and Safety of Transseptal Puncture and Endocardial Catheter Navigation , 2006, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[14]  A. Nelson,et al.  AORN Ergonomic Tool 4: Solutions for Prolonged Standing in Perioperative Settings. , 2011, AORN journal.

[15]  Shuxiang Guo,et al.  Online measuring and evaluation of guidewire inserting resistance for robotic interventional surgery systems , 2018 .

[16]  J. Valentin,et al.  Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. , 2000, Annals of the ICRP.

[17]  Shuxiang Guo,et al.  Study on real-time force feedback for a master–slave interventional surgical robotic system , 2018, Biomedical microdevices.

[18]  Alexander Norbash,et al.  Occupational health hazards in the interventional laboratory: time for a safer environment. , 2009, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[19]  K. Jo,et al.  Is Transradial Cerebral Angiography Feasible and Safe? A Single Center's Experience. , 2010, Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.

[20]  Feifan Ouyang,et al.  Remote navigation systems in electrophysiology. , 2008, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[21]  Shuxiang Guo,et al.  A cooperation of catheters and guidewires-based novel remote-controlled vascular interventional robot , 2018, Biomedical microdevices.

[22]  F. Ouyang,et al.  Remote Robotic Navigation and Electroanatomical Mapping for Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Considerations for Navigation and Impact on Procedural Outcome , 2009, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[23]  Shuxiang Guo,et al.  Operation evaluation in-human of a novel remote-controlled vascular interventional robot , 2018, Biomedical microdevices.

[24]  M. Petch,et al.  Transradial coronary angiography in patients with contraindications to the femoral approach: An analysis of 500 cases , 2004, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[25]  Fan Wu,et al.  [Epidemiologic characteristics of cerebrovascular disease mortality in China, 2004-2005]. , 2010, Zhonghua yu fang yi xue za zhi [Chinese journal of preventive medicine].