Soft-output MMSE MIMO detector under different channel estimation models

This study considers the effect of channel estimation error (CEE) on the soft-output bit log-likelihood ratio (LLR) in a multiple-input–multiple-output detection system which the source sends their quadrature amplitude modulation to the detector through Rayleigh fading channels. The new expressions of LLR with maximum-likelihood CE for deterministic channel model and minimum mean square error (MMSE) CE for random channel model are obtained separately for linear MMSE receiver using known pilot-symbol-aided CE. Meanwhile, the optimal power allocation between training and data transmissions for these two different LLR expressions, which attends to get the maximum ratio of signal and interference plus noise ratio, are obtained under the total transmitting power constraints. Numerical results show that the power allocation ratio sets to be ∼0.5 is optimal for two new different LLRs at the same total power and system noise. Moreover, the derived LLR expressions match the simulation result and outperform the conventional system without the consideration of CEE and optimal power allocation. Meanwhile, the system performance is better than the existing research with the consideration of CE.

[1]  Mohamed M. Khairy,et al.  Time domain leakage in DFT-based channel estimation for OFDM systems with guard bands , 2015, Int. J. Commun. Syst..

[2]  Azadeh Vosoughi,et al.  Optimal Training and Data Power Allocation in Distributed Detection With Inhomogeneous Sensors , 2013, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[3]  Jun Wang,et al.  Soft-Output MMSE MIMO Detector under Imperfect Channel Estimation , 2008, 2008 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[4]  Xiangyun Zhou,et al.  Training-Based SWIPT: Optimal Power Splitting at the Receiver , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[5]  Andrea J. Goldsmith,et al.  Capacity and power allocation for fading MIMO channels with channel estimation error , 2006, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[6]  Zhang Xiuyan,et al.  Comparison of V-BLAST / OSIC algorithm and the QR decomposition algorithm , 2013, Proceedings of 2013 2nd International Conference on Measurement, Information and Control.

[7]  Louay M. A. Jalloul,et al.  Soft-Output MIMO Detectors with Channel Estimation Error , 2015, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[8]  Alex B. Gershman,et al.  Training-based MIMO channel estimation: a study of estimator tradeoffs and optimal training signals , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[9]  Emil Björnson,et al.  A Framework for Training-Based Estimation in Arbitrarily Correlated Rician MIMO Channels With Rician Disturbance , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[10]  Andreas Spanias,et al.  Estimation Over Fading Channels With Limited Feedback Using Distributed Sensing , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[11]  E.G. Larsson,et al.  MIMO Detection Methods: How They Work [Lecture Notes] , 2009, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[12]  Gerald Matz,et al.  An efficient MMSE-based demodulator for MIMO bit-interleaved coded modulation , 2004, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2004. GLOBECOM '04..

[13]  Louay M. A. Jalloul,et al.  Comments on “Soft Decision Metric Generation for QAM With Channel Estimation Error” , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[14]  Michael P. Fitz,et al.  A Novel Soft-Output Layered Orthogonal Lattice Detector for Multiple Antenna Communications , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[15]  Giorgio Taricco,et al.  Optimum Receiver Design for Correlated Rician Fading MIMO Channels with Pilot-Aided Detection , 2007, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[16]  Erik G. Larsson,et al.  Fixed-Complexity Soft MIMO Detection via Partial Marginalization , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[17]  Qinfang Sun,et al.  Estimation of continuous flat fading MIMO channels , 2002, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun..