Nucleotide polymorphisms upstream of the X-chromosome opsin gene array tune L:M cone ratio

In support of the long-held idea that cone ratio is genetically determined by variation linked to the X-chromosome opsin gene locus, the present study identified nucleotide differences in DNA segments containing regulatory regions of the L and M opsin genes that are associated with significant differences in the relative number of L versus M cones. Specific haplotypes (combinations of genetic differences) were identified that correlated with high versus low L:M cone ratio. These findings are consistent with the biological principle that DNA sequence variations affect binding affinities for protein components of complexes that influence the relative probability that an L versus M opsin gene will be silenced during development, and in turn, produce variation in the proportion of L to M cones.

[1]  Jay Neitz,et al.  Estimates of L:M cone ratio from ERG flicker photometry and genetics. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[2]  J. Mollon,et al.  Human visual pigments: microspectrophotometric results from the eyes of seven persons , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[3]  Sabine Süsstrunk,et al.  Effects of motion and configural complexity on color transparency perception , 2006, Visual Neuroscience.

[4]  A. Emery,et al.  Human Molecular Genetics 2 , 2000, Neuromuscular Disorders.

[5]  Sarah A Tishkoff,et al.  Signatures of selection and gene conversion associated with human color vision variation. , 2004, American journal of human genetics.

[6]  J. Neitz,et al.  Cone pigment gene expression in individual photoreceptors and the chromatic topography of the retina. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[7]  Rappold,et al.  Human Molecular Genetics , 1996, Nature Medicine.

[8]  Barry B. Lee,et al.  From pigments to perception : advances in understanding visual processes , 1991 .

[9]  Joel Pokorny,et al.  Variability in Cone Populations and Implications , 1991 .

[10]  Jay Neitz,et al.  A novel mutation in the short-wavelength-sensitive cone pigment gene associated with a tritan color vision defect , 2006, Visual Neuroscience.

[11]  Heidi Hofer,et al.  Organization of the Human Trichromatic Cone Mosaic , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Jay Neitz,et al.  An urn model of the development of L/M cone ratios in human and macaque retinas , 2006, Visual Neuroscience.

[13]  Jay Neitz,et al.  The L:M cone ratio in males of African descent with normal color vision. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[14]  H. Vries,et al.  Luminosity Curve of Trichromats , 1946, Nature.

[15]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Spatial and temporal expression of cone opsins during monkey retinal development , 1997, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  David Williams,et al.  The arrangement of the three cone classes in the living human eye , 1999, Nature.

[17]  R. Fisher XV.—The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance. , 1919, Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh.

[18]  L. Penrose,et al.  THE CORRELATION BETWEEN RELATIVES ON THE SUPPOSITION OF MENDELIAN INHERITANCE , 2022 .

[19]  W A Rushton,et al.  Red--grees sensitivity in normal vision. , 1964, Vision research.

[20]  Jeremy Nathans,et al.  Role of a locus control region in the mutually exclusive expression of human red and green cone pigment genes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  D. Mccormick Sequence the Human Genome , 1986, Bio/Technology.