Architecture of a minimal signaling pathway explains the T-cell response to a 1 million-fold variation in antigen affinity and dose

Significance T cells initiate and regulate adaptive immune responses when their T-cell antigen receptors recognize antigens. The T-cell response is known to depend on the antigen affinity/dose, but the precise relationship, and the mechanisms underlying it, are debated. To resolve the debate, we stimulated T cells with antigens spanning a 1 million-fold range in affinity/dose. We found that a different antigen (and hence different affinity) produced the largest T-cell response at different doses. Using model identification algorithms, we report a simple mechanistic model that can predict the T-cell response from the physiological low-affinity regime into the high-affinity regime applicable to therapeutic receptors. T cells must respond differently to antigens of varying affinity presented at different doses. Previous attempts to map peptide MHC (pMHC) affinity onto T-cell responses have produced inconsistent patterns of responses, preventing formulations of canonical models of T-cell signaling. Here, a systematic analysis of T-cell responses to 1 million-fold variations in both pMHC affinity and dose produced bell-shaped dose–response curves and different optimal pMHC affinities at different pMHC doses. Using sequential model rejection/identification algorithms, we identified a unique, minimal model of cellular signaling incorporating kinetic proofreading with limited signaling coupled to an incoherent feed-forward loop (KPL-IFF) that reproduces these observations. We show that the KPL-IFF model correctly predicts the T-cell response to antigen copresentation. Our work offers a general approach for studying cellular signaling that does not require full details of biochemical pathways.

[1]  J. E. Brewer,et al.  T cell receptor binding affinity governs the functional profile of cancer-specific CD8+ T cells , 2015, Clinical and experimental immunology.

[2]  I. Pastan,et al.  Anti-CD22-chimeric antigen receptors targeting B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. , 2013, Blood.

[3]  A. Chakraborty,et al.  Coreceptor Scanning by the T Cell Receptor Provides a Mechanism for T Cell Tolerance , 2014, Cell.

[4]  Paul François,et al.  Evolving phenotypic networks in silico. , 2014, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[5]  Olivier Michielin,et al.  Interplay between T Cell Receptor Binding Kinetics and the Level of Cognate Peptide Presented by Major Histocompatibility Complexes Governs CD8+ T Cell Responsiveness* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  Omer Dushek,et al.  Phenotypic models of T cell activation , 2014, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[7]  I. Maly,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the role of receptor recycling in T cell polarization. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[8]  Alexis M. Kalergis,et al.  Efficient T cell activation requires an optimal dwell-time of interaction between the TCR and the pMHC complex , 2001, Nature Immunology.

[9]  D. Green,et al.  Activation‐induced cell death in T cells , 2003, Immunological reviews.

[10]  Daniel Coombs,et al.  Supplementary information for Activated TCRs remain marked for internalization after dissociation from pMHC , 2022 .

[11]  T. Schumacher,et al.  Evidence for a TCR Affinity Threshold Delimiting Maximal CD8 T Cell Function , 2010, The Journal of Immunology.

[12]  K. Takase,et al.  [T cell activation]. , 1995, Ryumachi. [Rheumatism].

[13]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Physicochemical modelling of cell signalling pathways , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[14]  M. Glickman,et al.  Control of T cell antigen reactivity via programmed TCR downregulation , 2015, Nature Immunology.

[15]  P. Simister,et al.  A THEMIS:SHP1 complex promotes T-cell survival , 2014, The EMBO journal.

[16]  Michel Sadelain,et al.  The promise and potential pitfalls of chimeric antigen receptors. , 2009, Current Opinion in Immunology.

[17]  Penelope A. Morel,et al.  Dominant Role of Antigen Dose in CD4+Foxp3+ Regulatory T Cell Induction and Expansion1 , 2009, The Journal of Immunology.

[18]  B. Jakobsen,et al.  Human T cells expressing affinity-matured TCR display accelerated responses but fail to recognize low density of MHC-peptide antigen. , 2011, Blood.

[19]  Jennifer A. McWilliams,et al.  Relating TCR-peptide-MHC affinity to immunogenicity for the design of tumor vaccines. , 2006, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[20]  T. Galli,et al.  [Activation-induced polarized recycling targets T cell receptors to the immunological synapse]. , 2005, Medecine sciences : M/S.

[21]  Taoyong Chen,et al.  K33-linked polyubiquitination of Zap70 by Nrdp1 controls CD8+ T cell activation , 2015, Nature Immunology.

[22]  G. Pazour,et al.  Specific recycling receptors are targeted to the immune synapse by the intraflagellar transport system , 2014, Journal of Cell Science.

[23]  Daniel Coombs,et al.  Dependence of T Cell Antigen Recognition on T Cell Receptor-Peptide MHC Confinement Time , 2010, Immunity.

[24]  Ruchi M. Newman,et al.  TRIM5 Suppresses Cross-Species Transmission of a Primate Immunodeficiency Virus and Selects for Emergence of Resistant Variants in the New Species , 2010, PLoS biology.

[25]  Daniel Coombs,et al.  Antigen Potency and Maximal Efficacy Reveal a Mechanism of Efficient T Cell Activation , 2011, Science Signaling.

[26]  Yi Li,et al.  Directed evolution of human T-cell receptors with picomolar affinities by phage display , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[27]  David Welch,et al.  Approximate Bayesian computation scheme for parameter inference and model selection in dynamical systems , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[28]  Arup K. Chakraborty,et al.  Fast on-rates allow short dwell time ligands to activate T cells , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  W. Lim,et al.  Defining Network Topologies that Can Achieve Biochemical Adaptation , 2009, Cell.

[30]  Bryan C. Daniels,et al.  Automated adaptive inference of coarse-grained dynamical models in systems biology , 2014, 1404.6283.

[31]  Jeremy Gunawardena,et al.  Models in biology: ‘accurate descriptions of our pathetic thinking’ , 2014, BMC Biology.

[32]  Ronald N Germain,et al.  Modeling T Cell Antigen Discrimination Based on Feedback Control of Digital ERK Responses , 2005, PLoS biology.

[33]  J. Allison,et al.  Strength of TCR–Peptide/MHC Interactions and In Vivo T Cell Responses , 2011, The Journal of Immunology.

[34]  Oreste Acuto,et al.  Tailoring T-cell receptor signals by proximal negative feedback mechanisms , 2008, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[35]  Daniel Coombs,et al.  T cell receptor binding kinetics required for T cell activation depend on the density of cognate ligand on the antigen-presenting cell. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  M. van den Broek,et al.  Antigen-specific in vitro expansion of functional redirected NY-ESO-1-specific human CD8+ T-cells in a cell-free system. , 2013, Anticancer research.

[37]  T. McKeithan,et al.  Kinetic proofreading in T-cell receptor signal transduction. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Omer Dushek,et al.  An induced rebinding model of antigen discrimination☆ , 2014, Trends in immunology.

[39]  R. Zamoyska,et al.  T cell receptor signalling networks: branched, diversified and bounded , 2013, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[40]  Mark M Davis,et al.  A role for "self" in T-cell activation. , 2007, Seminars in immunology.

[41]  J. Allison,et al.  Attenuated T Cell Responses to a High-Potency Ligand In Vivo , 2010, PLoS biology.

[42]  Casim A. Sarkar,et al.  Robust Network Topologies for Generating Switch-Like Cellular Responses , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[43]  U. Alon Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[44]  P. Maini,et al.  Multisite Phosphorylation Modulates the T Cell Receptor ζ-Chain Potency but not the Switchlike Response , 2016, Biophysical journal.

[45]  J. Allison,et al.  TCR ligand density and affinity determine peripheral induction of Foxp3 in vivo , 2010, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[46]  J. Boulter,et al.  Crystal structures of high affinity human T-cell receptors bound to peptide major histocompatibility complex reveal native diagonal binding geometry. , 2007, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[47]  David M Kranz,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the contribution of TCR/pepMHC affinity and CD8 to T cell activation. , 2003, Immunity.

[48]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Distilling Free-Form Natural Laws from Experimental Data , 2009, Science.

[49]  Jianzhu Chen,et al.  The Impact of TCR-Binding Properties and Antigen Presentation Format on T Cell Responsiveness1 , 2009, The Journal of Immunology.

[50]  B. Nal,et al.  Activation-induced polarized recycling targets T cell antigen receptors to the immunological synapse; involvement of SNARE complexes. , 2004, Immunity.

[51]  M. Gutmann,et al.  Approximate Bayesian Computation , 2012 .

[52]  Steven A. Rosenberg,et al.  Adoptive immunotherapy for cancer: harnessing the T cell response , 2012, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[53]  C. Hsieh,et al.  A broad range of self-reactivity drives thymic regulatory T cell selection to limit responses to self. , 2012, Immunity.

[54]  A. Heimberger,et al.  Tuning Sensitivity of CAR to EGFR Density Limits Recognition of Normal Tissue While Maintaining Potent Antitumor Activity. , 2015, Cancer research.

[55]  Julio R. Banga,et al.  Reverse engineering and identification in systems biology: strategies, perspectives and challenges , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[56]  A. Lanzavecchia,et al.  Serial triggering of many T-cell receptors by a few peptide–MHC complexes , 1995, Nature.

[57]  Matthew F. Krummel,et al.  Quantifying signaling-induced reorientation of T cell receptors during immunological synapse formation , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  M. Moser Faculty Opinions recommendation of Polarized release of T-cell-receptor-enriched microvesicles at the immunological synapse. , 2014 .