New Product Development Speed: Too Much of a Good Thing?

New product development (NPD) speed has become increasingly important for managing innovation in fast-changing business environments due to continuous reduction in the product life cycle time and increase in competition from technological advancements and globalization. While the existing literature has not produced consistent results regarding the relationship between speed and success for NPD projects, many scholars and practitioners assert that increasing NPD speed is virtually always important to NPD success. The purpose of this paper is to examine the implicit assumption that faster is better as it relates to new product success (NPS). From the perspectives of time-compression diseconomies and absorptive capacity, the authors question the assumption that speed has a linear relationship with success. The authors further argue that time-compression diseconomies depend on levels of uncertainty involved in NPD projects. Using survey data of 471 NPD projects, the hypotheses were tested by hierarchical regression analysis and subgroup polynomial regression. The results of this study indicate that NPD speed has a curvilinear relationship with NPS, and the nature of the speed–success relationship varies, depending on type and level of uncertainty. When turbulence or technological newness is high, the relationship is curvilinear, but when uncertainties are low, the relationship is linear. In contrast, the results of this study suggest a curvilinear relationship under conditions of low market newness but not when market newness is high. The present paper asserts that time-compression diseconomies and absorptive capacity are important theoretical constructs in understanding speed in NPD. The different impact of market newness and market turbulence on NPD speed supports the distinction of newness and turbulence as two different sources of uncertainty. Discussion focuses on the implications of NPD speed under the different conditions of uncertainty. NPD teams need to pursue NPD speed as a critical strategy, but it is necessary to analyze the source and degree of uncertainty about projects before a time-based strategy is selected. In order to address the challenges of high uncertainty, a firm needs to probe, learn, and iterate fast. In particular, NPD teams need to distinguish between the different requirements for new products in emerging and new markets, and those in fast-changing markets. Moreover, NPD teams need to balance how fast they need to go with how fast they can go by considering team absorptive capacity and customer absorptive capacity.

[1]  F. Knight The economic nature of the firm: From Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit , 2009 .

[2]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[3]  T. J. Allen Studies of the Problem-Solving Process in Engineering , 1966 .

[4]  F. Scherer Research and Development Resource Allocation Under Rivalry , 1967 .

[5]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Explaining organizational behavior , 1982 .

[6]  G. Huber,et al.  Retrospective reports of strategic‐level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy , 1985 .

[7]  R. Cooper,et al.  Success factors in product innovation , 1987 .

[8]  Joseph A. Cote,et al.  Estimating Trait, Method, and Error Variance: Generalizing across 70 Construct Validation Studies , 1987 .

[9]  Frances J. Milliken Three Types of Perceived Uncertainty About the Environment: State, Effect, and Response Uncertainty , 1987 .

[10]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Making Fast Strategic Decisions In High-Velocity Environments , 1989 .

[11]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[12]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Speeding Products to Market: Waiting Time to First Product Introduction in New Firms. , 1990 .

[13]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[14]  L. Humphreys,et al.  Assessing spurious "moderator effects": Illustrated substantively with the hypothesized ("synergistic") relation between spatial and mathematical ability. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Corporate imagination and expeditionary marketing. , 1991, Harvard business review.

[16]  C. Crawford The Hidden Costs of Accelerated Product Development , 1992 .

[17]  David Robertson,et al.  Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry , 1992 .

[18]  Linda Rochford,et al.  How involving more functional areas within a firm affects the new product process , 1992 .

[19]  M. Meyer,et al.  When speeding concepts to market can be a mistake , 1992 .

[20]  Organizations , 1992, Restoration & Management Notes.

[21]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality , 1992 .

[22]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences , 1993 .

[23]  N. Karagozoglu,et al.  Time‐Based Management of the New Product Development Process , 1993 .

[24]  R. Cooper,et al.  Determinants of Timeliness in Product Development , 1994 .

[25]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  Product development cycle time and commercial success , 1995 .

[26]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation , 1995 .

[27]  G. Lynn,et al.  Marketing and Discontinuous Innovation: The Probe and Learn Process , 1996 .

[28]  T. Hout Time-Based Competition Is Not Enough , 1996 .

[29]  Robert Kevin Grigsby "Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation" , 1996 .

[30]  A. Chakrabarti,et al.  Innovation Speed: A Conceptual Model of Context, Antecedents, and Outcomes , 1996 .

[31]  R. Calantone,et al.  New Product Activities and Performance: The Moderating Role of Environmental Hostility , 1997 .

[32]  D. Larcker,et al.  Product Development Cycle Time and Organizational Performance , 1997 .

[33]  H. Barkema,et al.  International Expansion Through Start-Up or Acquisition: A Learning Perspective , 1998 .

[34]  Ali E. Akgün,et al.  Innovation Strategies Under Uncertainty: A Contingency Approach for New Product Development , 1998 .

[35]  S. Slater,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: First, Fast, and On Time: The Path to Success. Or Is It? , 1999 .

[36]  Preston G. Smith From Experience : Reaping Benefit from Speed to Market , 1999 .

[37]  Kate D. Abel,et al.  Practices that Support Team Learning and Their Impact on Speed to Market and New Product Success , 1999 .

[38]  Kate D. Abel,et al.  Key Factors in Increasing Speed to Market and Improving New Product Success Rates , 1999 .

[39]  A. Chakrabarti,et al.  Speeding Up the Pace of New Product Development , 1999 .

[40]  Roger Calantone,et al.  Performance and time to market: accelerating cycle time with overlapping stages , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[41]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[42]  Mohan V. Tatikonda,et al.  Integrating Operations and Marketing Perspectives of Product Innovation: The Influence of Organizational Process Factors and Capabilities on Development Performance , 2001 .

[43]  E. Carayannis,et al.  Is technological learning a firm core competence, when, how and why? A longitudinal, multi-industry study of firm technological learning and market performance , 2002 .

[44]  Peter S. Davis,et al.  The impact of time on the strategy–performance relationship: Implications for managers , 2002 .

[45]  A. Griffin PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT CYCLE TIME FOR BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS PRODUCTS , 2002 .

[46]  Eric H. Kessler,et al.  Is faster really better? An empirical test of the implications of innovation speed , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[47]  S. Bell,et al.  Organizing for new product development speed and the implications for organizational stress , 2002 .

[48]  Francisco Javier Miranda González,et al.  The effect of new product development techniques on new product success in Spanish firms , 2002 .

[49]  Gerardo A. Okhuysen,et al.  The Speed Trap: Exploring the Relationship Between Decision Making and Temporal Context , 2002 .

[50]  H. Barkema,et al.  Pace, rhythm and scope: Process dependence in building a profitable multinational corporation , 2002 .

[51]  B. Lukas,et al.  Antecedents and outcomes of new product development speed: An interdisciplinary conceptual framework , 2002 .

[52]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  The Effects of Environmental Turbulence on New Product Development Strategy Planning , 2003 .

[53]  Shmuel Ellis,et al.  Organizational Learning Mechanisms and Managers’ Perceived Uncertainty , 2003 .

[54]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[55]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  Strategic Decision Comprehensiveness and New Product Development Outcomes in New Technology Ventures , 2004 .

[56]  A. Joshi,et al.  Customer Knowledge Development: Antecedents and Impact on New Product Performance , 2004 .

[57]  S. Vickery,et al.  The effects of internal versus external integration practices on time-based performance and overall firm performance , 2004 .

[58]  H. Wagner Internationalization speed and cost efficiency: evidence from Germany , 2004 .

[59]  B. Lukas,et al.  New product quality: intended and unintended consequences of new product development speed , 2004 .

[60]  Daniel P. Forbes Managerial determinants of decision speed in new ventures , 2005 .

[61]  Vijay Govindarajan,et al.  Ten Rules for Strategic Innovators: From Idea to Execution , 2005 .

[62]  G. Lynn,et al.  Team Empowerment , Uncertainty , and Performance In New Product Development , 2005 .

[63]  Richard R. Reilly,et al.  The impacts of speed-to-market on new product success: the moderating effects of uncertainty , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[64]  C. Markides Disruptive Innovation: In Need of Better Theory* , 2006 .

[65]  Clayton M. Christensen The Ongoing Process of Building a Theory of Disruption , 2006 .

[66]  V. Govindarajan,et al.  The Usefulness of Measuring Disruptiveness of Innovations Ex Post in Making Ex Ante Predictions* , 2006 .

[67]  Fernando F. Suarez,et al.  The Role of Environmental Dynamics in Building a First Mover Advantage Theory , 2007 .

[68]  Marc H. Meyer The Fast Path to Corporate Growth: Leveraging Knowledge and Technologies to New Market Applications , 2007 .

[69]  Clayton M. Christensen EXPLORING THE LIMITS OF THE TECHNOLOGY S‐CURVE. PART II: ARCHITECTURAL TECHNOLOGIES , 1992 .

[70]  Clayton M. Christensen EXPLORING THE LIMITS OF THE TECHNOLOGY S‐CURVE. PART I: COMPONENT TECHNOLOGIES , 1992 .

[71]  Richard R. Reilly,et al.  Understanding Antecedents of New Product Development Speed: A Meta-Analysis , 2010 .