What leads us to share valuable knowledge? An experimental study of the effects of managerial control, group identification, and social value orientation on knowledge-sharing behavior

Knowledge management (KM) has become an important focus in today's information systems research and practice. An experiment investigated three factors that influence the behavior of individuals contributing their personally-held knowledge to a knowledge management system (KMS): managerial control, group identification, social value orientation, specifically when the individual sharer believes that the knowledge they are considering sharing has some potential value to them and others in their organization. Hypotheses suggested main and interaction effects of the three antecedents to sharing of valuable knowledge. Supported main effects included managerial control and social value orientation, and the 2-way interaction between social value orientation and managerial control was also supported. The hypothesized three-way interaction was supported. This research can expand understanding of the antecedents of knowledge sharing for both researchers and practitioners alike.

[1]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Knowledge Management Systems: Issues, Challenges, and Benefits , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Henk Sol,et al.  Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1997, HICSS 2015.

[3]  H. D. Thomas,et al.  SUCCESSFUL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PROJECTS , 1998 .

[4]  K. R. Conner,et al.  A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism , 1996 .

[5]  G. Marwell,et al.  The critical mass in collective action , 1993 .

[6]  H. Demsetz.  The Theory of the Firm Revisited , 1988 .

[7]  Scott McCoy,et al.  Contributing Valuable Knowledge to a Knowledge Management System , 2001 .

[8]  Brian K. Thorn,et al.  Discretionary Data Bases , 1987 .

[9]  D. Cremer,et al.  Social identification effects in social dilemmas : a transformation of motives , 1999 .

[10]  R. Bies,et al.  Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome , 1989 .

[11]  D. Organ.  Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. , 1988 .

[12]  Paul S. Goodman,et al.  Computer-Aided Systems and Communities: Mechanisms for Organizational Learning in Distributed Environments , 1998, MIS Q..

[13]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  What's your strategy for managing knowledge? , 1999, Harvard business review.

[14]  J. Spender.  Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[15]  L. Perlow.  Boundary control: The social ordering of work and family time in a high-tech corporation. , 1998 .

[16]  Bernard J. Jaworski.  Toward a Theory of Marketing Control: Environmental Context, Control Types, and Consequences , 1988 .

[17]  David De Cremer,et al.  Leadership in social dilemmas: The effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods , 1999 .

[18]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[19]  G. Marwell,et al.  The critical mass in collective action : a micro-social theory , 1993 .

[20]  Mats Alvesson,et al.  Cultural-Ideological Modes of Management Control : A Theory and a Case Study of a Professional Service Company , 1993 .

[21]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate , 2005, MIS Q..

[22]  Charles Cole.  Shannon revisited: Information in terms of uncertainty , 1993 .

[23]  D. Messick,et al.  Motivational bases of choice in experimental games , 1968 .

[24]  Pamela L. Eddy.  COLLEGE ' OF WILLIAM AND MARY , 2004 .

[25]  Ronald R. King,et al.  Voluntary Disclosures When Seller's Level of Information Is Unknown , 1991 .

[26]  A. Rapoport.  Research paradigms and expected utility models for the provision of step-level public goods. , 1987 .

[27]  Scott McCoy,et al.  The most important issues in knowledge management , 2002, CACM.

[28]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[29]  S. Kiesler,et al.  The kindness of strangers: on the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice , 1996 .