Background While the advantages of laparoscopic cholecyslectomy are clear, the benefits of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) are more subtle. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to evaluate whether LA is deserving of more widespread clinical application than it has yet received. Materials and methods Two hundred fiftythree patients with a preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis were randomized into three groups. LA with an endoscopic linear stapler (LAS) (U.S. Surgical Corp., Norwalk, Connecticut) was performed on 78 patients, LA with catgut ligatures (LAL) on 89, and open appendectomy (OA) on 86. LA was performed with a three-trocar technique. OA was accomplished through a right lower-quadrant transverse incision. Data with normal distributions were analyzed by analysis of variance. Nonparametric data were analyzed with either the Kruskal-Wallis H test or Fisher's exact test. Results The mean operative times for the procedures were 66 ± 24 minutes (LAS), 68 ± 25 minutes (LAL), and 58 ± 27 minutes (OA). The relative brevity of OA compared to LAS and LAL was statistically significant ( P P P = NS). Wound infections were more common following OA (n = 11) than LAL (n = 4) or LAS (n = 0) ( P P P P Conclusions Laparoscopic appendectomy appears to have distinct advantages over open appendectomy. The laparoscopic procedures produced less pain and allowed more rapid return to full activities, and LAS required shorter hospital stays. The only disadvantages to the laparoscopic approach were slightly increased operative time for both procedures, and increased emesis following LAL.
[1]
M. Sugrue,et al.
Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: a prospective evaluation
,
1993,
The British journal of surgery.
[2]
W. Lau,et al.
Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: prospective randomised trial
,
1993,
The Lancet.
[3]
F. Götz,et al.
Laparoscopic appendectomy in 625 cases: from innovation to routine.
,
1991,
Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy.
[4]
K. Sharp,et al.
A review of the results of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.
,
1993,
Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.
[5]
B. Smithers,et al.
Laparoscopic versus Open Appendectomy: Prospective Randomized Trial
,
1996,
World Journal of Surgery.
[6]
R. Stephens,et al.
A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.
,
1992,
Surgery.