Water Policy Reform in Australia: Lessons from the Victorian Seasonal Water Market

The nature of the seasonal water market is examined using a theoretical model and empirical evidence from the Victorian market. Drivers of the seasonal opportunity cost of water include the underlying nature of investment in the industry made in the context of risky entitlement yields; and the timing and nature of information regarding seasonal water availability and rainfall. Seasonal water markets facilitate the reallocation of water availability according to this short-run opportunity cost. Evidence from the market suggests that transactions costs are low and most of the existing constraints to trade in seasonal allocations are the result of hydrological conditions. Analysis of market data suggests that the price response of the market to water availability is much more pronounced in years of low rainfall. The implications of the paper for wider policy reform are that attention should be paid to improving property rights for the management of intertemporal risk before other reforms, such as broadening of permanent water markets and institutionalising environmental flows, are implemented. This is because these other reforms will change the spatial and temporal pattern of water use and thus affect reliability, which underpins the value of water in irrigated agriculture.

[1]  Integrated assessment and management of stochastic water resources in the Murray Darling Basin , 2005 .

[2]  Michael Young A preliminary Assessment of the economic and social implications of Environmental Flow Scenarios for the Murray River System , 2002 .

[3]  Jeffrey Bennett,et al.  Valuing New South Wales Rivers for Use in Benefit Transfer , 2004 .

[4]  A. Heaney,et al.  Water Trade and Irrigation: Defining Property Rights to Return Flows , 2001 .

[5]  D. Brennan,et al.  INVESTING IN GRAIN STORAGE FACILITIES UNDER FLUCTUATING PRODUCTION , 1991 .

[6]  J. Quiggin,et al.  State-contingent modelling of the Murray Darling Basin: implications for the design of property rights , 2006 .

[7]  A. Watson Approaches to Increasing River Flows , 2003 .

[8]  John Freebairn Principles for the Allocation of Scarce Water , 2003 .

[9]  J. Quiggin,et al.  Water Rights for Variable Supplies , 2006 .

[10]  Productivity Commission,et al.  Responsiveness of Demand for Irrigation Water: A Focus on the Southern Murray-Darling Basin , 2005 .

[11]  J. Crean,et al.  Regional agricultural implications of environmental flows in the Murrumbidgee Valley, Australia. , 2002 .

[12]  Jane M. Fry,et al.  Modelling Water Trade in the Southern Murray-Darling Basin , 2004 .

[13]  T. Goesch,et al.  Efficient Use of Water: Role of Secure Property Rights , 2002 .

[14]  A. Heaney,et al.  Evaluating improvements in irrigation efficiency as a salinity mitigation option in the South Australian Riverland , 2001 .

[15]  M. Young,et al.  Robust Reform: The Case for a New Water Entitlement System for Australia , 2003 .

[16]  A. Hart,et al.  PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT , 2007 .

[17]  Stephen Beare,et al.  TRADING WITH THE ENVIRONMENT using water options to meet environmental demands , 2004 .

[18]  A. Heaney,et al.  Third-Party Effects of Water Trading and Potential Policy Responses , 2006 .

[19]  M. Young,et al.  Robust Reform: Implementing robust institutional arrangements to achieve efficient water use in Australia , 2003 .