Maximize the operating profit of a SWRO-PRO integrated process for optimal water production and energy recovery

Pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) is a promising technology to reduce the specific energy consumption and the operating expenditure of a seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) plant. In this study, a simple analytical PRO model is developed to predict the PRO performance as the dilution of draw solutions occurs. The model can predict the PRO performance with a high accuracy without carrying out complicated integrations and experiments. The operating profit of SWRO-PRO is also studied by calculating the profit generated for every m3 of seawater entering the process because maximizing the operating profit is the uttermost objective of the SWRO-PRO process. Based on the PRO analytical model, the operating profit and the dynamics of the SWRO-PRO process, a strategy has been proposed to maximize the operating profit of the SWRO-PRO process while maintaining the highest power density of the PRO membranes. This study proves that integration of SWRO with PRO can (1) push the SWRO to a higher recovery and maintain its high profitability, (2) effectively reduce the specific energy consumption of desalination by up to 35% and (3) increase the operating profit up to 100%.

[1]  Rong Wang,et al.  A modeling investigation on optimizing the design of forward osmosis hollow fiber modules , 2012 .

[2]  Edvard Sivertsen,et al.  Pressure retarded osmosis efficiency for different hollow fibre membrane module flow configurations , 2013 .

[3]  J. Lienhard,et al.  Limits of power production due to finite membrane area in pressure retarded osmosis , 2014 .

[4]  T. Holt,et al.  The potential for power production from salinity gradients by pressure retarded osmosis , 2009 .

[5]  Joon Ha Kim,et al.  Reverse osmosis (RO) and pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) hybrid processes: Model-based scenario study , 2013 .

[6]  Ngai Yin Yip,et al.  Thin-film composite pressure retarded osmosis membranes for sustainable power generation from salinity gradients. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Assessing the current state of commercially available membranes and spacers for energy production with pressure retarded osmosis , 2016 .

[8]  Baltasar Peñate,et al.  Current trends and future prospects in the design of seawater reverse osmosis desalination technology , 2012 .

[9]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Membrane-based processes for sustainable power generation using water , 2012, Nature.

[10]  A. Efraty.  Closed circuit PRO series no 2: performance projections for PRO membranes based on actual/ideal flux ratio of forward osmosis , 2016 .

[11]  Sui Zhang,et al.  Progress in pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) membranes for osmotic power generation , 2015 .

[12]  Gary L. Amy,et al.  What is next for forward osmosis (FO) and pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) , 2015 .

[13]  Tai‐Shung Chung,et al.  Osmotic power production from seawater brine by hollow fiber membrane modules: Net power output and optimum operating conditions , 2016 .

[14]  Chun Feng Wan,et al.  Energy recovery by pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) in SWRO–PRO integrated processes , 2016 .

[15]  Guy Z. Ramon,et al.  Scale-up characteristics of membrane-based salinity-gradient power production , 2015 .

[16]  Tai‐Shung Chung,et al.  Design of robust hollow fiber membranes with high power density for osmotic energy production , 2014 .

[17]  O. A. Bamaga,et al.  Hybrid FO/RO desalination system: Preliminary assessment of osmotic energy recovery and designs of new FO membrane module configurations , 2011 .

[18]  Jeffrey A. Ruskowitz,et al.  RO-PRO desalination: An integrated low-energy approach to seawater desalination , 2014 .

[19]  John H. Lienhard,et al.  Second law analysis of reverse osmosis desalination plants: An alternative design using pressure retarded osmosis , 2011 .

[20]  Tai-Shung Chung,et al.  Forward osmosis processes: Yesterday, today and tomorrow , 2012 .

[21]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Power generation with pressure retarded osmosis: An experimental and theoretical investigation , 2009 .

[22]  Benny D. Freeman,et al.  Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today's challenges. , 2009, Water research.

[23]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Module-scale analysis of pressure retarded osmosis: performance limitations and implications for full-scale operation. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  A. Tanioka,et al.  Power generation with salinity gradient by pressure retarded osmosis using concentrated brine from SWRO system and treated sewage as pure water , 2012 .

[25]  Avi Efraty,et al.  Pressure retarded osmosis in closed circuit: a new technology for clean power generation without need of energy recovery , 2013 .

[26]  Guy Z. Ramon,et al.  Membrane-based production of salinity-gradient power , 2011 .

[27]  P. Christofides,et al.  Minimization of energy consumption for a two-pass membrane desalination: Effect of energy recovery, membrane rejection and retentate recycling , 2009 .

[28]  S. Liyanaarachchi,et al.  Problems in seawater industrial desalination processes and potential sustainable solutions: a review , 2014, Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology.

[29]  Gang Han,et al.  Robust and high performance pressure retarded osmosis hollow fiber membranes for osmotic power generation , 2014 .

[30]  Giorgio Migliorini,et al.  Seawater reverse osmosis plant using the pressure exchanger for energy recovery: a calculation model** , 2004 .

[31]  Leif J. Hauge.  The pressure exchanger — A key to substantial lower desalination cost , 1995 .

[32]  Chun Feng Wan,et al.  Osmotic power generation by pressure retarded osmosis using seawater brine as the draw solution and wastewater retentate as the feed , 2015 .

[33]  P. Christofides,et al.  Effect of Thermodynamic Restriction on Energy Cost Optimization of RO Membrane Water Desalination , 2009 .