Extensive Fatal Intracoronary Thrombosis During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Bivalirudin

The authors describe 2 cases of extensive intracoronary thrombus formation leading to acute closure of the left main where bivalirudin (Angiomax) was used as the anticoagulant during percutaneous coronary intervention leading to mortality. Both cases had similarity in the cascade of complications of coronary dissection leading to slow flow and prolonged procedure time with compromise of antegrade flow in the coronary artery and a final catastrophic development of extensive intracoronary thrombosis extending into the left main and nonintervened vessel (left anterior descending or circumflex) followed by ventricular fibrillation and death. Bivalirudin has reversible anticoagulant pharmacodynamics because the bivalirudin molecule is cleaved by the thrombin molecule. In situations when the antegrade flow is compromised, delivery of fresh circulating bivalirudin to replenish the catalysis of bivalirudin by thrombin is diminished, allowing thrombin activity to regenerate, thereby creating a prothrombotic milieu in these coronary segments. This can lead to extensive intracoronary thrombus formation in situations of slow flow precipitated by coronary dissection and prolonged dwell time with intracoronary hardware (wires, balloons, and stents). Interventionalists should be aware of the potential risk of this fatal complication and should be proactive in recognizing the scenarios where this is likely to occur. In such anticipated circumstances, the interventionalist may judiciously switch the anticoagulant to heparin and/or use additional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor because freshly formed intracoronary thrombus is susceptible to lysis by glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.

[1]  B. Reitz,et al.  Case report: a thrombus in the venous reservoir while using bivalirudin in a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia undergoing heart transplantation. , 2010, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[2]  K. Werdan,et al.  Comparison of bivalirudin, enoxaparin, and unfractionated heparin in preventing cardiac catheter thrombosis , 2008, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[3]  B. Gersh,et al.  Bivalirudin during primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  J. Ware,et al.  Bivalirudin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a subgroup analysis from the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategy (ACUITY) trial , 2007, The Lancet.

[5]  G. Tadros,et al.  Intracoronary Macrothrombus Formation During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Despite Optimal Activated Clotting Time Using Bivalirudin , 2005, Angiology.

[6]  K. Kent,et al.  Brachytherapy and bivalirudin evaluation study. , 2005, American heart journal.

[7]  A. Colombo,et al.  Safety and feasibility of Bivalirudin with either Cypher and Taxus drug-eluting stent during percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2005, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[8]  L. Satler,et al.  Bivalirudin‐associated intracoronary thrombosis during γ‐brachytherapy and its experimental validation in acute swine model , 2004, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[9]  P. Shukla,et al.  Bivalirudin (Angiomax) Use during Intracoronary Brachytherapy May Predispose to Acute Closure , 2003, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics.

[10]  E. Topol,et al.  Bivalirudin and provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared with heparin and planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary intervention: REPLACE-2 randomized trial. , 2003, JAMA.

[11]  V. F. Mauro,et al.  Pharmacology and Clinical Use of Bivalirudin , 2002, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.