GRACE's spatial aliasing error

SUMMARY The GRACE satellite mission provides a near-continuous sequence of approximately 30-d gravity field solutions in the form of spherical harmonics (SH). Because SH functions are global while GRACE measurements are sensitive mainly to variations along the ground-track, undersampling (alias contamination) occurs. Here we investigate how geophysical signals are likely to cause alias error in GRACE gravity fields. We use actual GRACE orbits and systematically sample several types of time-varying signals that might represent either errors in geophysical models such as tide models, or unmodelled geophysical signals. We show how error in semi-diurnal tides like S 2 can alias into long period variations in particular harmonics, particularly as a possible error source in the degree 2, order 0 term (C 20) of GRACE fields. We also show that aliasing associated with non-tidal geophysical model errors is significant at order 15 or multiples of 15, due to the GRACE ground track spacing in longitude. This can be predicted from Kaula’s resonance formula and might be reduced by suppressing amplitudes of affected harmonics.

[1]  Jeffrey P. Walker,et al.  THE GLOBAL LAND DATA ASSIMILATION SYSTEM , 2004 .

[2]  Srinivas Bettadpur,et al.  Impact of short period, non‐tidal, temporal mass variability on GRACE gravity estimates , 2004 .

[3]  R. Reynolds,et al.  The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project , 1996, Renewable Energy.

[4]  W. M. Kaula,et al.  Theory of Satellite Geodesy: Applications of Satellites to Geodesy , 2000 .

[5]  S. Swenson,et al.  Post‐processing removal of correlated errors in GRACE data , 2006 .

[6]  Pieter Visser,et al.  Accuracy assessment of the monthly GRACE geoids based upon a simulation , 2006 .

[7]  A. Bennett,et al.  TOPEX/POSEIDON tides estimated using a global inverse model , 1994 .

[8]  Duane E. Waliser,et al.  Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) alias error from ocean tides , 2008 .

[9]  D. Rowlands,et al.  Tidal Models in a New Era of Satellite Gravimetry , 2003 .

[10]  Richard D. Ray,et al.  A Global Ocean Tide Model From TOPEX/POSEIDON Altimetry: GOT99.2 , 1999 .

[11]  W. M. Kaula Theory of satellite geodesy , 1966 .

[12]  C. Shum,et al.  Time‐variable aliasing effects of ocean tides, atmosphere, and continental water mass on monthly mean GRACE gravity field , 2004 .

[13]  Kurt Lambeck,et al.  Geophysical geodesy : the slow deformations of the earth Lambeck. , 1988 .

[14]  F. Bryan,et al.  Time variability of the Earth's gravity field: Hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE , 1998 .

[15]  C. Provost,et al.  FES99: A Global Tide Finite Element Solution Assimilating Tide Gauge and Altimetric Information , 2002 .

[16]  M. Watkins,et al.  The gravity recovery and climate experiment: Mission overview and early results , 2004 .

[17]  Gary S. E. Lagerloef,et al.  Satellite Gravity and the Geosphere: Contributions to the Study of the Solid Earth and Its Fluid Earth , 1998 .

[18]  Scott B. Luthcke,et al.  FAST TRACK PAPER: Tide model errors and GRACE gravimetry: towards a more realistic assessment , 2006 .