Investigating filopodia sensing using arrays of defined nano-pits down to 35 nm diameter in size.

In order for cells to react to topography, they must be able to sense shape. When considering nano-topography, these shapes are much smaller than the cell, but still strong responses to nano-topography have been seen. Filopodia, or microspikes, presented by cells at their leading edges are thought to be involved in gathering of special information. In order to investigate this, and to develop an understanding of what size of feature can be sensed by cells, morphological observation (electron and fluorescent microscopy) of fibroblasts reacting to nano-pits with 35, 75 and 120 nm diameters has been used in this study. The nano-pits are especially interesting because unlike many of the nanofeatures cited in the literature, they have no height for the cells to react to. The results showed that cell filopodia, and retraction fibres, interacted with all pit sizes, although direct interaction was hard to image on the 35 nm pits. This suggests that cells are extremely sensitive to their nanoevironment and that should be taken in to consideration when designing next-generation tissue engineering materials. We suggest that this may occur through nanocontact guidance as filopodia are moved over the pits.

[1]  C. Oakley,et al.  The sequence of alignment of microtubules, focal contacts and actin filaments in fibroblasts spreading on smooth and grooved titanium substrata. , 1993, Journal of cell science.

[2]  A Curtis,et al.  Synergistic and hierarchical adhesive and topographic guidance of BHK cells. , 1996, Experimental cell research.

[3]  C. David,et al.  Nanofabrication using hot embossing lithography and electroforming , 2001 .

[4]  Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al.  Biomimetic Polymer Nanostructures by Injection Molding , 2003 .

[5]  M. Schwartz,et al.  The extracellular matrix as a cell survival factor. , 1993, Molecular biology of the cell.

[6]  A. Curtis,et al.  The influence of microscale topography on fibroblast attachment and motility. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[7]  P. Forscher,et al.  Cytoskeletal remodeling during growth cone-target interactions , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[8]  C. McCaig,et al.  Guidance of CNS growth cones by substratum grooves and ridges: effects of inhibitors of the cytoskeleton, calcium channels and signal transduction pathways. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[9]  M. Riehle,et al.  Interaction of animal cells with ordered nanotopography. , 2002, IEEE transactions on nanobioscience.

[10]  Matthew J Dalby,et al.  Nucleus alignment and cell signaling in fibroblasts: response to a micro-grooved topography. , 2003, Experimental cell research.

[11]  Paul Martin,et al.  Structures in focus--filopodia. , 2002, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[12]  Mathis O. Riehle,et al.  The use of materials patterned on a nano- and micro-metric scale in cellular engineering , 2002 .

[13]  S. Frisch,et al.  Disruption of epithelial cell-matrix interactions induces apoptosis , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  L. Van Aelst,et al.  Rho GTPases: signaling, migration, and invasion. , 2000, Experimental cell research.

[15]  B. Kasemo,et al.  Control of nanoparticle film structure for colloidal lithography , 2003 .

[16]  G. Charras,et al.  Single cell mechanotransduction and its modulation analyzed by atomic force microscope indentation. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[17]  W. Korohoda,et al.  CONTACT GUIDANCE OF CHICK EMBRYO NEURONS ON SINGLE SCRATCHES IN GLASS AND ON UNDERLYING ALIGNED HUMAN SKIN FIBROBLASTS , 1999, Cell biology international.

[18]  A Curtis,et al.  Guidance and activation of murine macrophages by nanometric scale topography. , 1996, Experimental cell research.

[19]  T. Yanagida,et al.  Single-Molecule Analysis of Chemotactic Signaling in Dictyostelium Cells , 2001, Science.

[20]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Patterning colloidal nanotopographies , 2002 .

[21]  P. Weiss,et al.  Shape and Movement of Mesenchyme Cells as Functions of the Physical Structure of the Medium: Contributions to a Quantitative Morphology. , 1952, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  P Connolly,et al.  Cell guidance by ultrafine topography in vitro. , 1991, Journal of cell science.

[23]  P. Devreotes,et al.  Tumor Suppressor PTEN Mediates Sensing of Chemoattractant Gradients , 2002, Cell.

[24]  W. Bonfield,et al.  Optimizing HAPEX topography influences osteoblast response. , 2002, Tissue engineering.

[25]  G. E. Jones,et al.  The Rho GTPases in macrophage motility and chemotaxis. , 1998, Cell adhesion and communication.

[26]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Topographical control of cell behaviour: II. Multiple grooved substrata. , 1990, Development.

[27]  M. Stamm,et al.  Topography and Surface Composition of Thin Films of Blends of Polystyrene with Brominated Polystyrenes: Effects of Varying the Degree of Bromination and Annealing , 1998 .

[28]  A. Carrel,et al.  CULTIVATION IN VITRO OF MALIGNANT TUMORS , 1911, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[29]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Arrays of nano-dots for cellular engineering , 2003 .

[30]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.

[31]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Topographical control of cell behaviour. I. Simple step cues. , 1987, Development.

[32]  Focal adhesion kinase in integrin-mediated signaling. , 1999 .

[33]  M. Stamm,et al.  The effect of molecular weight on the topography of thin films of blends of poly(4-bromostyrene) and polystyrene , 2000 .

[34]  Richard A. Pethrick,et al.  Surface Topography and Composition of Deuterated Polystyrene-Poly(bromostyrene) Blends , 1996 .

[35]  S. Britland,et al.  Contact guidance of CNS neurites on grooved quartz: influence of groove dimensions, neuronal age and cell type. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[36]  A S G Curtis,et al.  Polymer-demixed nanotopography: control of fibroblast spreading and proliferation. , 2002, Tissue engineering.

[37]  D. Bentley,et al.  Accumulation of actin in subsets of pioneer growth cone filopodia in response to neural and epithelial guidance cues in situ , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[38]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Embossing of nanoscale features and environments , 1997 .

[39]  C. Murphy,et al.  Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[40]  D. Cumming,et al.  Fabrication of 3 nm wires using 100 keV electron beam lithography and poly(methyl methacrylate) resist , 1996 .

[41]  Yves F. Dufrêne,et al.  Fabrication of nanostructured polymer surfaces using colloidal lithography and spin-coating , 2002 .

[42]  K. Burridge,et al.  Focal adhesions, contractility, and signaling. , 1996, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[43]  Christophe Vieu,et al.  Electron beam lithography: resolution limits and applications , 2000 .

[44]  K. Vuori.  Integrin Signaling: Tyrosine Phosphorylation Events in Focal Adhesions , 1998, The Journal of Membrane Biology.

[45]  A S G Curtis,et al.  In vitro reaction of endothelial cells to polymer demixed nanotopography. , 2002, Biomaterials.