Heritability of ambulatory and office blood pressure phenotypes in Swedish families

Objective The aim of this study was to estimate the heritability of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure and office blood pressure phenotypes in Swedish families. Methods We measured ambulatory and office blood pressure in 260 siblings without antihypertensive treatment from 118 families. Blood pressure heritability was estimated using standard quantitative genetic variance component analysis implemented in the ‘SOLAR’ software package after adjustment for significant covariates. Results Heritability values were significant for night-time systolic (37%), diastolic (32%) and mean (32%) ambulatory blood pressure (P < 0.05 for all). During daytime, systolic ambulatory blood pressure was significantly heritable (33%, P < 0.05). Twenty-four-hour systolic (30%) and diastolic (29%) ambulatory blood pressure also had significant values of heritability (P < 0.05). Pulse pressure ambulatory blood pressure was significantly heritable over 24 h (63%, P < 0.01), during daytime (53%, P < 0.01) and at night (34%, P < 0.05). None of the office blood pressure phenotypes had a significant heritability. Conclusions We conclude that ambulatory blood pressure, in particular at night, seems better than office blood pressure to capture the heritable part of blood pressure, suggesting that ambulatory blood pressure may be a more exact estimate of an individual's true blood pressure. Genetic studies using ambulatory blood pressure as the phenotype are likely to be more powerful than those using office blood pressure. The high heritability of pulse pressure ambulatory blood pressure indicates that variation in arterial stiffness in subjects free from antihypertensive medication is strongly affected by genetic factors.

[1]  J. Norris,et al.  Genome scan linkage results for longitudinal systolic blood pressure phenotypes in subjects from the Framingham Heart Study , 2003, BMC Genetics.

[2]  H. Coon,et al.  Genome-Wide Multipoint Parametric Linkage Analysis of Pulse Pressure in Large, Extended Utah Pedigrees , 2003, Hypertension.

[3]  G. Beunen,et al.  Influence of chorionicity on the heritability estimates of blood pressure: a study in twins , 2003, Journal of hypertension.

[4]  M. Pfeffer,et al.  Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Using Pulse Pressure in the First National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES I) , 2001, Hypertension.

[5]  R. Fagard,et al.  The impact of genetic and environmental influences on blood pressure variance across age-groups , 2001, Journal of hypertension.

[6]  S. Straus,et al.  Measurement of blood presssure: an evidence based review , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  Martin G. Larson,et al.  Does the Relation of Blood Pressure to Coronary Heart Disease Risk Change With Aging?: The Framingham Heart Study , 2001, Circulation.

[8]  J. Maccluer,et al.  Genome-Wide Linkage Analysis of Pulse Pressure in Mexican Americans , 2001, Hypertension.

[9]  F A McAlister,et al.  Evidence based treatment of hypertension. Measurement of blood pressure: an evidence based review. , 2001, BMJ.

[10]  J. Manson,et al.  Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure, Pulse Pressure, and Mean Arterial Pressure as Predictors of Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Men , 2000, Hypertension.

[11]  Anita L. DeStefano,et al.  Evidence for a Gene Influencing Blood Pressure on Chromosome 17: Genome Scan Linkage Results for Longitudinal Blood Pressure Phenotypes in Subjects From the Framingham Heart Study , 2000, Hypertension.

[12]  P. Hamet,et al.  Genetic determinants of hypertension: identification of candidate phenotypes. , 2000, Hypertension.

[13]  P. Verdecchia,et al.  Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure : current evidence and clinical implications. , 2000, Hypertension.

[14]  B R Davis,et al.  Isolated systolic hypertension : prognostic information provided by pulse pressure. , 1999, Hypertension.

[15]  Gianfranco Parati,et al.  Predicting cardiovascular risk using conventional vs ambulatory blood pressure in older patients with systolic hypertension. , 1999 .

[16]  J. Baguet,et al.  Clinical value of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. , 1999, Journal of hypertension.

[17]  G Parati,et al.  Predicting cardiovascular risk using conventional vs ambulatory blood pressure in older patients with systolic hypertension. Systolic Hypertension in Europe Trial Investigators. , 1999, JAMA.

[18]  D. Levy,et al.  Trends in the prevalence of hypertension, antihypertensive therapy, and left ventricular hypertrophy from 1950 to 1989. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  L. Almasy,et al.  Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[20]  K. Eriksson,et al.  Cardiovascular risk groups and mortality in an urban Swedish male population: the Malmö Preventive Project , 1996, Journal of internal medicine.

[21]  J. Staessen,et al.  Heritability of conventional and ambulatory blood pressures. A study in twins. , 1995, Hypertension.

[22]  W. White,et al.  Effects of actual versus arbitrary awake and sleep times on analyses of 24-h blood pressure. , 1995, American journal of hypertension.

[23]  Professor Göran Berglund The Malmö Diet and Cancer Study Design, biological bank and biomarker programme , 1993 .

[24]  Minisymposium: The Malmö Diet and Cancer Study. Design, biological bank and biomarker programme. 23 October 1991, Malmo, Sweden. , 1993, Journal of Internal Medicine.

[25]  S Rössner,et al.  Improved accuracy of indirect blood pressure measurement in patients with obese arms. , 1993, American journal of hypertension.

[26]  R. Ward Familial aggregation and genetic epidemiology of blood pressure , 1990 .

[27]  S C Hunt,et al.  A comparison of positive family history definitions for defining risk of future disease. , 1986, Journal of chronic diseases.