Extracting significant signal of news consumption from social networks: the case of Twitter in Italian political elections

According to the Eurobarometer report about EU media use of May 2018, the number of European citizens who consult on-line social networks for accessing information is considerably increasing. In this work we analyse approximately 106 tweets exchanged during the last Italian elections held on March 4, 2018. Using an entropy-based null model discounting the activity of the users, we first identify potential political alliances within the group of verified accounts: if two verified users are retweeted more than expected by the non-verified ones, they are likely to be related. Then, we derive the users’ affiliation to a coalition measuring the polarisation of unverified accounts. Finally, we study the bipartite directed representation of the tweets and retweets network, in which tweets and users are collected on the two layers. Users with the highest out-degree identify the most popular ones, whereas highest out-degree posts are the most “viral”. We identify significant content spreaders with a procedure that allows to statistically validate the connections that cannot be explained by users’ tweeting activity and posts’ virality, using an entropy-based null model as benchmark. The analysis of the directed network of validated retweets reveals signals of the alliances formed after the elections, highlighting commonalities of interests before the event of the national elections.

[1]  A. Barabasi,et al.  The network takeover , 2011, Nature Physics.

[2]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Entropy-based randomisation of rating networks , 2018, Physical review. E.

[3]  Antonio Scala,et al.  Polarization Rank: A Study on European News Consumption on Facebook , 2018, ArXiv.

[4]  H. Oshagan REFERENCE GROUP INFLUENCE ON OPINION EXPRESSION , 1996 .

[5]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  Quantifying the Effect of Sentiment on Information Diffusion in Social Media , 2015, PeerJ Comput. Sci..

[6]  D. Boyd,et al.  CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA , 2012 .

[7]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign , 1954 .

[8]  Agata Fronczak,et al.  Exponential random graph models for networks with community structure , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Early detection of promoted campaigns on social media , 2017, EPJ Data Science.

[10]  Stefan Stieglitz,et al.  Quantitative Approaches to Comparing Communication Patterns on Twitter , 2012 .

[11]  M. Bekafigo,et al.  Who Tweets About Politics? , 2013 .

[12]  Renaud Lambiotte,et al.  TiDeH: Time-Dependent Hawkes Process for Predicting Retweet Dynamics , 2016, ICWSM.

[13]  A. J. Morales,et al.  Characterizing and modeling an electoral campaign in the context of Twitter: 2011 Spanish Presidential Election as a case study , 2012, Chaos.

[14]  Reinhard Diestel,et al.  Graph Theory, 4th Edition , 2012, Graduate texts in mathematics.

[15]  E. Jaynes Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics , 1957 .

[16]  Domenico Di Gangi,et al.  Assessing Systemic Risk Due to Fire Sales Spillover Through Maximum Entropy Network Reconstruction , 2015, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control.

[17]  Giulio Cimini,et al.  Statistically validated network of portfolio overlaps and systemic risk , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[18]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  6. Katz, E. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[19]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  Disinformation and Social Bot Operations in the Run Up to the 2017 French Presidential Election , 2017, First Monday.

[20]  D. Garlaschelli,et al.  Early-warning signals of topological collapse in interbank networks , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[21]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Community detection in graphs , 2009, ArXiv.

[22]  G. Walsberg,et al.  Direct calorimetry reveals large errors in respirometric estimates of energy expenditure , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[23]  Andrea Gabrielli,et al.  Randomizing bipartite networks: the case of the World Trade Web , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[24]  Michela Del Vicario,et al.  Public discourse and news consumption on online social media: A quantitative, cross-platform analysis of the Italian Referendum , 2017, ArXiv.

[25]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Mapping social dynamics on Facebook: The Brexit debate , 2017, Soc. Networks.

[26]  Steven E Wheeler,et al.  Local nature of substituent effects in stacking interactions. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[27]  Fred Morstatter,et al.  Tampering with Twitter’s Sample API , 2018, EPJ Data Science.

[28]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[29]  Kevin Driscoll,et al.  Big Data, Big Questions| Working Within a Black Box: Transparency in the Collection and Production of Big Twitter Data , 2014 .

[30]  Davide Colombi,et al.  Political Discussion and Leanings on Twitter: the 2016 Italian Constitutional Referendum , 2018, ArXiv.

[31]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Opinion dynamics on interacting networks: media competition and social influence , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[32]  David Lee,et al.  Biased assimilation, homophily, and the dynamics of polarization , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Political Polarization on Twitter , 2011, ICWSM.

[34]  G. Caldarelli,et al.  The spreading of misinformation online , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  G. Enli,et al.  PERSONALIZED CAMPAIGNS IN PARTY-CENTRED POLITICS , 2013 .

[36]  J. Bollen,et al.  More Tweets, More Votes: Social Media as a Quantitative Indicator of Political Behavior , 2013, PloS one.

[37]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Echo Chambers: Emotional Contagion and Group Polarization on Facebook , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[38]  Ning Wang,et al.  Assessing the bias in samples of large online networks , 2014, Soc. Networks.

[39]  Diego Garlaschelli,et al.  Maximum-Entropy Networks: Pattern Detection, Network Reconstruction and Graph Combinatorics , 2017 .

[40]  Hernán A. Makse,et al.  CUNY Academic Works , 2022 .

[41]  David Domke,et al.  The Spiral of Silence and Public Opinion on Affirmative Action , 2001 .

[42]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook , 2015, Science.

[43]  Pere Caminal,et al.  Graph theory-based measures as predictors of gene morbidity , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[44]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Social media and political discussion: when online presence silences offline conversation , 2017 .

[45]  E. Todeva Networks , 2007 .

[46]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Analyzing the Digital Traces of Political Manipulation: The 2016 Russian Interference Twitter Campaign , 2018, 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM).

[47]  Manlio De Domenico,et al.  Influence of augmented humans in online interactions during voting events , 2018, PloS one.

[48]  R. Gibson,et al.  Does Cyber‐Campaigning Win Votes? Online Communication in the 2004 Australian Election , 2005 .

[49]  Anton Pelinka Paul F. Lazarsfeld/Bernard Berelson/Hazel Gaudet: The People’s Choice – How the Voter makes up his Mind in a Presidential Campaign, Duell, Sloan and Pearce: New York 1944, XXXIII + 178 S. (dt. Wahlen und Wähler, Luchterhand: Neuwied/Berlin 1969, 231 S.) , 2016 .

[50]  Walid Magdy,et al.  UK General Election 2017: a Twitter Analysis , 2017, ArXiv.

[51]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign , 1968 .

[52]  Giorgio Fagiolo,et al.  Enhanced reconstruction of weighted networks from strengths and degrees , 2013, 1307.2104.

[53]  Paul F. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Voting. A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign , 1956 .

[54]  Giulio Cimini,et al.  The statistical physics of real-world networks , 2018, Nature Reviews Physics.

[55]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  A Multi-Level Geographical Study of Italian Political Elections from Twitter Data , 2014, PloS one.

[56]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  Broadcasters and Hidden Influentials in Online Protest Diffusion , 2012, ArXiv.

[57]  Justin M. Rao,et al.  Ideological Segregation and the Effects of Social Media on News Consumption , 2013 .

[58]  Diego Garlaschelli,et al.  Analytical maximum-likelihood method to detect patterns in real networks , 2011, 1103.0701.

[59]  David A. Shamma,et al.  Characterizing debate performance via aggregated twitter sentiment , 2010, CHI.

[60]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Measuring Online Social Bubbles , 2015, 1502.07162.

[61]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  The Dynamics of Protest Recruitment through an Online Network , 2011, Scientific reports.

[62]  Flaviano Morone,et al.  Validation of Twitter opinion trends with national polling aggregates: Hillary Clinton vs Donald Trump , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[63]  D. Garlaschelli,et al.  Maximum likelihood: extracting unbiased information from complex networks. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[64]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Reconstructing Mesoscale Network Structures , 2018, Complex..

[65]  Huan Liu,et al.  Is the Sample Good Enough? Comparing Data from Twitter's Streaming API with Twitter's Firehose , 2013, ICWSM.

[66]  Renaud Lambiotte,et al.  Predicting links in ego-networks using temporal information , 2015, EPJ Data Science.

[67]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog , 2005, LinkKDD '05.

[68]  Antonio Scala,et al.  Polarization of the Vaccination Debate on Facebook , 2018, Vaccine.

[69]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[70]  M. Newman,et al.  Statistical mechanics of networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[71]  R. Folk,et al.  Poisson‐Voronoi核形成と成長変形における分域構造の時間発展:一次元と三次元の結果 , 2008 .

[72]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Scale-Free Networks , 2007 .

[73]  Andrea Gabrielli,et al.  Inferring monopartite projections of bipartite networks: an entropy-based approach , 2016 .

[74]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.