Location Specificity of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation on Neuronal Electrodynamics: A Mathematical Model of Ion Channel Gating Dynamics and Ionic Flux Due to Neurostimulation

Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (TES) continues to demonstrate success as a medical intervention for individuals with neurodegenerative diseases. Despite promising results from these neuromodulation modalities, the cellular level mechanisms by which this neurotherapy operates are not fully comprehended. In particular, the effects of TES on ion channel gating and ion transport are not known. Using the Poisson-Nernst-Planck model of electrodiffusion, coupled with a Hodgkin-Huxley based model of cellular ion transport, we present a model of TES that, for the first time, integrates electric potential energy, individualized ion species, voltage-gated ion channels, and transmembrane ionic flux during TES administration. Computational simulations are executed on a biologically-inspired domain with medically-based TES treatment parameters and quantify neuron-level electrical processes resulting from this form of neurostimulation. Results confirm prior findings that show that TES polarizes the cell membrane, however, these are extended as simulations in this paper show that polarization occurs in a location specific manner, where the type and degree of polarization depends on the position on the membrane within a node of Ranvier. In addition, results demonstrate that TES causes ion channel gating variables to change in a location specific fashion and, as a result, transmembrane current from distinct ion species depends on both time and membrane location. Another simulation finding is that intracellular calcium concentrations increase significantly due to a TES-induced calcium influx. As cytosolic calcium is critical in intracellular signaling pathways that govern proper neurotransmitter secretion as well as support cell viability, this alteration in calcium homeostasis suggests a possible mechanism by which TES operates at the neuronal level to achieve neurotherapeutic success.

[1]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Physiological Basis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2011, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[2]  R. Sadleir.  A Bidomain Model for Neural Tissue , 2010 .

[3]  Felipe Fregni,et al.  Non-invasive brain stimulation to assess and modulate neuroplasticity in Alzheimer's disease , 2011, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[4]  A. Schweikard,et al.  Finite element simulation of transcranial current stimulation in realistic rat head model , 2011, 2011 5th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering.

[5]  Chun Liu,et al.  PNP equations with steric effects: a model of ion flow through channels. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[6]  D. Attwell,et al.  Node of Ranvier length as a potential regulator of myelinated axon conduction speed , 2017, eLife.

[7]  J. Jefferys,et al.  Effects of uniform extracellular DC electric fields on excitability in rat hippocampal slices in vitro , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  Anders Logg,et al.  The FEniCS Project Version 1.5 , 2015 .

[9]  L. Cohen,et al.  Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation/transcranial direct current stimulation in cognitive neurorehabilitation , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[10]  Henry C. Tuckwell,et al.  Quantitative aspects of L-type Ca2+ currents , 2012, Progress in Neurobiology.

[11]  Joakim Sundnes,et al.  Computing the electrical activity in the heart , 2006 .

[12]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  A pilot study on effects of 4×1 High-Definition tDCS on motor cortex excitability , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[13]  Davi R. Ortega,et al.  Universal architecture of bacterial chemoreceptor arrays , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  O. Donchin,et al.  Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Neuronal Functions , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[15]  Mark H. Ellisman,et al.  Development of a model for microphysiological simulations , 2005, Neuroinformatics.

[16]  Christophe Geuzaine,et al.  Gmsh: A 3‐D finite element mesh generator with built‐in pre‐ and post‐processing facilities , 2009 .

[17]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Cellular effects of deep brain stimulation: model-based analysis of activation and inhibition. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Yasuo Hori,et al.  Increase in the calcium level following anodal polarization in the rat brain , 1995, Brain Research.

[19]  Hans Petter Langtangen,et al.  Computational Partial Differential Equations - Numerical Methods and Diffpack Programming , 1999, Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering.

[20]  M. Hallett,et al.  A finite element analysis of the effect of electrode area and inter-electrode distance on the spatial distribution of the current density in tDCS , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[21]  Matthew D. Johnson,et al.  Mechanisms and targets of deep brain stimulation in movement disorders , 2008, Neurotherapeutics.

[22]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Validation of finite element model of transcranial electrical stimulation using scalp potentials: implications for clinical dose , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[23]  Denis Kouame,et al.  New Estimators and Guidelines for Better Use of Fetal Heart Rate Estimators with Doppler Ultrasound Devices , 2014, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[24]  M. Rasband,et al.  Excitable domains of myelinated nerves: axon initial segments and nodes of Ranvier. , 2013, Current topics in membranes.

[25]  Yan Chen,et al.  ffects of transcranial direct current stimulation on language mprovement and cortical activation in nonfluent variant primary rogressive aphasia , 2013 .

[26]  Yu,et al.  Changes of Cerebral , 2001 .

[27]  F. Fregni,et al.  Temporal cortex direct current stimulation enhances performance on a visual recognition memory task in Alzheimer disease , 2008, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry.

[28]  Eric Jones,et al.  SciPy: Open Source Scientific Tools for Python , 2001 .

[29]  V. Bennett.  Functional organization of vertebrate plasma membrane , 2013 .

[30]  James C. Turner,et al.  An Object-Oriented Framework for Versatile Finite Element Based Simulations of Neurostimulation , 2016 .

[31]  Emmanuel Mandonnet,et al.  The role of electrode direction during axonal bipolar electrical stimulation: a bidomain computational model study , 2011, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[32]  I. Bezprozvanny.  Calcium signaling and neurodegenerative diseases. , 2009, Trends in molecular medicine.

[33]  J. Young,et al.  The nodes of Ranvier , 1952, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[34]  Aslak Tveito,et al.  Systems of PDEs and Block Preconditioning , 2003 .

[35]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation--technical, safety and functional aspects. , 2003, Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology.

[36]  Changes in cerebral glucose metabolism after 3 weeks of noninvasive electrical stimulation of mild cognitive impairment patients , 2016, Alzheimer's Research & Therapy.

[37]  M. Hallett,et al.  Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[38]  R K Wong,et al.  Calcium current activation kinetics in isolated pyramidal neurones of the Ca1 region of the mature guinea‐pig hippocampus. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[39]  S. Reeves,et al.  A pilot study of the tolerability and effects of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) on pain perception. , 2011, The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society.

[40]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation in Parkinson's disease , 2006, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[41]  T. Katsaounis.  Advanced Topics in Computational Partial Differential Equations: Numerical Methods and Diffpack Programming , 2005 .

[42]  W. Paulus.  Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES – tDCS; tRNS, tACS) methods , 2011, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[43]  J. S. Coggan,et al.  Computational modeling of three-dimensional electrodiffusion in biological systems: application to the node of Ranvier. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[44]  Casey H. Buitenhuys,et al.  Small Nodes of Ranvier From Peripheral Nerves of Mice Reconstructed by Electron Tomography , 2005 .

[45]  Validation of electrical stimulation models: intracellular calcium measurement in three-dimensional scaffolds. , 2017, Journal of neurophysiology.

[46]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[47]  Frank Vogel,et al.  Multiscale Coupling of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Neuron Electrodynamics: Modeling the Influence of the Transcranial Electric Field on Neuronal Depolarization , 2014, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[48]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on working memory in patients with Parkinson's disease , 2006, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[49]  Ibrahima Dione,et al.  Improved Simulation of Electrodiffusion in the Node of Ranvier by Mesh Adaptation , 2016, PloS one.

[50]  Marisa Brini,et al.  Calcium signaling in Parkinson’s disease , 2014, Cell and Tissue Research.

[51]  E. Hairer,et al.  Solving Ordinary Differential Equations II: Stiff and Differential-Algebraic Problems , 2010 .

[52]  V. Vingtdeux,et al.  Calcium signaling in neurodegeneration , 2009, Molecular Neurodegeneration.

[53]  D. Surmeier,et al.  Calcium and Parkinson's disease. , 2017, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[54]  L. Cohen,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008 , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[55]  A. Antal,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[56]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[57]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Uncovering the mechanism(s) of action of deep brain stimulation: activation, inhibition, or both , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[58]  Peter Bastian,et al.  Electrodiffusion models of neurons and extracellular space using the Poisson-Nernst-Planck equations--numerical simulation of the intra- and extracellular potential for an axon model. , 2013, Biophysical journal.