Super H-mode: theoretical prediction and initial observations of a new high performance regime for tokamak operation

A new ‘Super H-mode’ regime is predicted, which enables pedestal height and predicted fusion performance substantially higher than for H-mode operation. This new regime is predicted to exist by the EPED pedestal model, which calculates criticality constraints for peeling–ballooning and kinetic ballooning modes, and combines them to predict the pedestal height and width. EPED usually predicts a single (‘H-mode’) pedestal solution for each set of input parameters, however, in strongly shaped plasmas above a critical density, multiple pedestal solutions are found, including the standard ‘H-mode’ solution, and a ‘Super H-Mode’ solution at substantially larger pedestal height and width. The Super H-mode regime is predicted to be accessible by controlling the trajectory of the density, and to increase fusion performance for ITER, as well as for DEMO designs with strong shaping. A set of experiments on DIII-D has identified the predicted Super H-mode regime, and finds pedestal height and width, and their variation with density, in good agreement with theoretical predictions from the EPED model. The very high pedestal enables operation at high global beta and high confinement, including the highest normalized beta achieved on DIII-D with a quiescent edge.

[1]  T. Osborne,et al.  Access to a new plasma edge state with high density and pressures using the quiescent H mode. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[2]  R. Davidson,et al.  Foreword to Special Issue: Papers from the 55th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics, November 11–14, 2013, Denver, Colorado, USA , 2014 .

[3]  Jet Efda Contributors,et al.  Global and pedestal confinement in JET with a Be/W metallic wall , 2014 .

[4]  P. McCarthy,et al.  Impact of Te and ne on edge current density profiles in ELM mitigated regimes on ASDEX Upgrade , 2014 .

[5]  R. Churchill,et al.  Improved understanding of physics processes in pedestal structure, leading to improved predictive capability for ITER , 2013 .

[6]  T. Osborne,et al.  Pedestal study across a deuterium fuelling scan for high δ ELMy H-mode plasmas on JET with the carbon wall , 2013 .

[7]  R. Churchill,et al.  Pedestal structure and stability in H-mode and I-mode: a comparative study on Alcator C-Mod , 2013 .

[8]  C. Giroud,et al.  The H-mode pedestal structure and its role on confinement in JET with a carbon and metal wall , 2013 .

[9]  R. H. Bulmer,et al.  Sustained Spheromak Physics Experiment (SSPX): design and physics results , 2012 .

[10]  Characterization of the pedestal in Alcator C-Mod ELMing H-modes and comparison with the EPED model , 2012 .

[11]  P. B. Snyder,et al.  The EPED pedestal model and edge localized mode-suppressed regimes: Studies of quiescent H-mode and development of a model for edge localized mode suppression via resonant magnetic perturbations , 2012 .

[12]  Jeff M. Candy,et al.  Full linearized Fokker–Planck collisions in neoclassical transport simulations , 2011 .

[13]  J. Stober,et al.  Confinement of 'improved H-modes' in the all-tungsten ASDEX Upgrade with nitrogen seeding , 2011 .

[14]  H. R. Wilson,et al.  A first-principles predictive model of the pedestal height and width: development, testing and ITER optimization with the EPED model , 2011 .

[15]  Jet Efda Contributors,et al.  H-mode pedestal scaling in DIII-D, ASDEX Upgrade, and JET , 2011 .

[16]  S. J. Wukitch,et al.  High confinement/high radiated power H-mode experiments in Alcator C-Mod and consequences for International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) QDT = 10 operationa) , 2011 .

[17]  T. Osborne,et al.  Limits to the H-mode pedestal pressure gradient in DIII-D , 2010 .

[18]  Y. Kamada,et al.  Pedestal stability comparison and ITER pedestal prediction , 2009 .

[19]  Effects of a sheared toroidal rotation on the stability boundary of the MHD modes in the tokamak edge pedestal , 2009 .

[20]  H. Koslowski,et al.  MHD stability analysis of small ELM regimes in JET , 2009 .

[21]  R. J. Groebner,et al.  Development and validation of a predictive model for the pedestal height , 2008 .

[22]  T. Osborne,et al.  Edge pedestal control in quiescent H-mode discharges in DIII-D using co-plus counter-neutral beam injection , 2008 .

[23]  T. Osborne,et al.  Edge stability of stationary ELM-suppressed regimes on DIII-D , 2008 .

[24]  Maxim Umansky,et al.  Stability and dynamics of the edge pedestal in the low collisionality regime: physics mechanisms for steady-state ELM-free operation , 2007 .

[25]  G. Huysmans ELMs: MHD instabilities at the transport barrier , 2005 .

[26]  T. Osborne,et al.  Characterization of peeling-ballooning stability limits on the pedestal , 2004 .

[27]  R. Budny,et al.  Improved Performance of ELMy H-Modes at High Density by Plasma Shaping in JET , 2002 .

[28]  L. Lao,et al.  Edge localized modes and the pedestal: A model based on coupled peeling–ballooning modes , 2002 .

[29]  H. Wilson,et al.  Numerical studies of edge localized instabilities in tokamaks , 2002 .

[30]  Taina Kurki-Suonio,et al.  Formation and detection of internal transport barriers in low-current tokamaks , 2002 .