Improving discriminating power in data envelopment models based on deviation variables framework

Abstract Lack of discriminating power in efficiency values remain a major contention in the literature of data envelopment analysis (DEA). To overcome this problem, a well-known procedure for ranking efficient units; that is, the super-efficiency model was proposed. The method enables an extreme efficient DMU to achieve an efficiency value greater than one by excluding the DMU under evaluation from the reference set of the DEA model. However, infeasibility problems may persist while applying the super-efficiency DEA model under the constant returns-to-scale (CRS), and this problem tends to be compounded under the variable returns-to-scale (VRS). In order to address this drawback sufficiently, we extend the deviation variable form of classical VRS technique and propose a procedure for ranking efficient units based on the deviation variables values framework in both forms – CRS and VRS. With our proposed method, scholars who wish to prescribe theories based on a set of contextual factors need not remove large number of DMUs that are infeasible, thus avoiding problems in generalizability of their findings. We illustrate the performance and validate the efficacy of our proposed method against alternative methods with two established numerical examples.

[1]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Super-efficiency infeasibility and zero data in DEA , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  T. Sexton,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions , 1986 .

[3]  Joe Zhu,et al.  A modified super-efficiency DEA model for infeasibility , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[4]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[5]  Marcos Pereira Estellita Lins,et al.  Review of Methods for Increasing Discrimination in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2002, Ann. Oper. Res..

[6]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Super-efficiency DEA in the presence of infeasibility , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Yao Chen,et al.  Measuring super-efficiency in DEA in the presence of infeasibility , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Hasan Bal,et al.  Improving the discrimination power and weights dispersion in the data envelopment analysis , 2010, Comput. Oper. Res..

[9]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years , 2008 .

[10]  Gary R. Reeves,et al.  A multiple criteria approach to data envelopment analysis , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  John E. Beasley,et al.  Restricting Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1990 .

[12]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[13]  Rodney H. Green,et al.  Efficiency and Cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, Meanings and Uses , 1994 .

[14]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[15]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  A bi-objective weighted model for improving the discrimination power in MCDEA , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[17]  Adel Hatami-Marbini,et al.  A taxonomy and review of the fuzzy data envelopment analysis literature: Two decades in the making , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Alireza Amirteimoori,et al.  A Method for Solving Super-Efficiency Infeasibility by Adding virtual DMUs with Mean Values , 2017 .

[19]  W. Cook,et al.  Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation , 1996 .

[20]  Moussa Larbani,et al.  Multiobjective data envelopment analysis , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[21]  Lidia Angulo Meza,et al.  A goal programming approach to solve the multiple criteria DEA model , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Jiazhen Huo,et al.  Super-efficiency based on a modified directional distance function , 2013 .

[23]  K. Chin,et al.  The use of OWA operator weights for cross-efficiency aggregation , 2011 .

[24]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Joe Zhu,et al.  DEA Cobb–Douglas frontier and cross-efficiency , 2014, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[26]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  The super-efficiency procedure for outlier identification, not for ranking efficient units , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Efficiency characterizations in different DEA models , 1988 .

[28]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  A neutral DEA model for cross-efficiency evaluation and its extension , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[29]  Majid Soleimani-Damaneh,et al.  A comment on "Measuring super-efficiency in DEA in the presence of infeasibility" , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..