Synthetic vision enhanced surface operations and flight procedures rehearsal tool

Limited visibility has been cited as predominant causal factor for both Controlled-Flight-Into-Terrain (CFIT) and runway incursion accidents. NASA is conducting research and development of Synthetic Vision Systems (SVS) technologies which may potentially mitigate low visibility conditions as a causal factor to these accidents while replicating the operational benefits of clear day flight operations, regardless of the actual outside visibility condition. Two experimental evaluation studies were performed to determine the efficacy of two concepts: 1) head-worn display application of SVS technology to enhance transport aircraft surface operations, and 2) three-dimensional SVS electronic flight bag display concept for flight plan preview, mission rehearsal and controller-pilot data link communications interface of flight procedures. In the surface operation study, pilots evaluated two display devices and four display modes during taxi under unlimited and CAT II visibility conditions. In the mission rehearsal study, pilots flew approaches and departures in an operationally-challenged airport environment, including CFIT scenarios. Performance using the SVS concepts was compared to traditional baseline displays with paper charts only or EFB information. In general, the studies evince the significant situation awareness and enhanced operational capabilities afforded from these advanced SVS display concepts. The experimental results and conclusions from these studies are discussed along with future directions.

[1]  Divya C Chandra,et al.  Human Factors Considerations in the Design and Evaluation of Electronic Flight Bags (Efbs)-Version 2 , 2003 .

[2]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  CFIT prevention using synthetic vision , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[3]  Michael D. Byrne,et al.  Using Computational Cognitive Modeling to Diagnose Possible Sources of Aviation Error , 2005 .

[4]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  Crew and display concepts evaluation for synthetic/enhanced vision systems , 2006, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[5]  Anthony D. Andre,et al.  Taxiway Navigation and Situation Awareness (T-NASA) System: Problem, Design Philosophy, and Description of an Integrated Display Suite for Low-Visibility Airport Surface Operations , 1996 .

[6]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  Development and evaluation of 2D and 3D exocentric synthetic vision navigation display concepts for commercial aircraft , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[7]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  Flight test comparison between enhanced vision (FLIR) and synthetic vision systems , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[8]  Lynda J. Kramer,et al.  Flight Test Comparison of Synthetic Vision Display Concepts at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport , 2003 .

[9]  Barbara G. Kanki,et al.  An Evaluation of the Taxiway Navigation and Situation Awareness (T-NASA) System in High-Fidelity Simulation , 1998 .

[10]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  Flight test evaluation of tactical synthetic vision display concepts in a terrain-challenged operating environment , 2002, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[11]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  Flight testing an integrated synthetic vision system , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[12]  Denise R. Jones,et al.  Runway incursion prevention system testing at the Wallops Flight Facility , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[13]  Becky L. Hooey,et al.  A Post-Hoc Analysis of Navigation Errors During Surface Operations: Identification of Contributing Factors and Mitigating Solutions , 2002 .

[14]  Lawrence L Ames,et al.  Revision and Verification of a Seven-Point Workload Estimate Scale , 1993 .