Value and rareness of resources and capabilities as sources of competitive advantage and superior performance

ABSTRACT The premises of the resource-based theory, hypothesising that valuable and rare resources and capabilities, contribute to a firm’s competitive advantage and, consequently, superior performance, seem to be based more on intuition than empirical evidence. This study aims to empirically investigate the relationship between value, rareness, competitive advantage, and performance. Based on data from 107 Portuguese KIBS firms, the findings show that value neither is related to competitive advantage nor performance, while KIBS with rare combinations are likely to achieve higher levels of competitive advantage and performance. In addition to a direct positive influence on performance, competitive advantage was found to have a partial mediating role in the rareness–performance relationship, indicating an indirect effect of the rareness characteristic and a fundamental precedent role of competitive advantage to performance. This research contributes towards a better operationalisation of the theory, evidencing the importance of resource/capability characteristics fororganisational success.

[1]  Richard Makadok.  Toward a synthesis of the resource‐based and dynamic‐capability views of rent creation , 2001 .

[2]  Jim Andersén,et al.  Strategic resources and firm performance , 2011 .

[3]  O. Kuivalainen,et al.  The effect of network competence and environmental hostility on the internationalization of SMEs , 2012 .

[4]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[5]  Tai-Shan Hu.  Developments in interactive relationships and knowledge between KIBS firms and their clients in Taiwan , 2017 .

[6]  Margaret A. Peteraf,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/mde.1126 Unraveling The Resource-Based Tangle , 2022 .

[7]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[8]  Marco Paiola,et al.  Searching for innovation knowledge: insight into KIBS companies , 2017 .

[9]  T. C. Powell.  Competitive advantage: logical and philosophical considerations , 2001 .

[10]  J. Barney.  Looking inside for competitive advantage , 1995 .

[11]  Daniela Carlucci,et al.  Knowledge-intensity as an organisational characteristic , 2011 .

[12]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Simone Strambach,et al.  The contribution of KIBS to innovation in cities: an evolutionary and institutional perspective , 2006, J. Knowl. Manag..

[14]  Wenyi Chu,et al.  Entrepreneurial orientation and competitive advantage: The mediation of resource value and rareness , 2011 .

[15]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[16]  João Ferreira,et al.  Innovation management capabilities in rural and urban knowledge intensive business services: empirical evidence , 2015 .

[17]  Roberto Grandinetti,et al.  The KIBS paradox and structural holes , 2018 .

[18]  R. Grant.  The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation , 1991 .

[19]  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[20]  Yiannis E. Spanos,et al.  An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: contrasting Porter's competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective , 2001 .

[21]  Albena Pergelova,et al.  The impact of government financial support on the performance of new firms: the role of competitive advantage as an intermediate outcome , 2014 .

[22]  Brian Snowdon,et al.  Competitive Advantage Revisited: Michael Porter on Strategy and Competitiveness , 2007 .

[23]  Scott L. Newbert.  Empirical research on the resource‐based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research , 2007 .

[24]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[25]  J. E. Butler,et al.  Tautology in the resource-based view and the implications of externally determined resource value: f , 2001 .

[26]  Gideon D. Markman,et al.  Patents as Surrogates for Inimitable and Non-Substitutable Resources , 2004 .

[27]  Mark Goh,et al.  Impact of value chain activities on quality and innovation , 2008 .

[28]  Luisa Margarida Carvalho,et al.  Portuguese knowledge intensive business services: What do we know about them? O que sabemos sobre os knowledge intensive business services portugueses? , 2013 .

[29]  David J. Miller,et al.  An asymmetry‐based view of advantage: towards an attainable sustainability , 2003 .

[30]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[31]  Nabil Amara,et al.  Impacts of obstacles on innovation patterns in KIBS firms , 2016 .

[32]  C. Castaldi,et al.  Co-Innovation By Kibs In Environmental Services — A Knowledge-Based Perspective , 2013 .

[33]  Maliah Sulaiman,et al.  Ensuring sustainability: a preliminary study of environmental management accounting in Malaysia , 2012 .

[34]  Jorge Gallego,et al.  The Specialization in Knowledge-Intensive Business Services (KIBS) across Europe: Permanent Co-Localization to Debate , 2015 .

[35]  J. Ntayi,et al.  Competitive advantage: mediator of intellectual capital and performance , 2011 .

[36]  Scott L. Newbert.  Value, rareness, competitive advantage, and performance: a conceptual‐level empirical investigation of the resource‐based view of the firm , 2008 .

[37]  Haofei Ma.  COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE AND FIRM PERFORMANCE , 2000 .

[38]  Haim Hilman,et al.  Competitive Strategies Issues on Performance of Manufacturing Industries: Partial Least Square (PLS) Approach , 2014 .

[39]  M. Porter.  Towards a dynamic theory of strategy , 1991 .

[40]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[41]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[42]  Véronique Ambrosini,et al.  Identifying Valuable Resources , 2007 .

[43]  Richard L. Priem,et al.  Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? , 2001 .

[44]  Robert W. Palmatier,et al.  Resource-based theory in marketing , 2014 .

[45]  Djamhur Hamid,et al.  The Effect of The Resources and Capabilities to Competitive Advantage and Company's Performance of "Batik" Micro , 2013 .

[46]  Mark A. Huselid,et al.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Perceptions of Organizational Performance , 1996 .

[47]  T. O'Shannassy.  Sustainable competitive advantage or temporary competitive advantage: Improving understanding of an important strategy construct , 2008 .

[48]  David G. Sirmon,et al.  Resource Management in Dyadic Competitive Rivalry: The Effects of Resource Bundling and Deployment , 2008 .

[49]  J. Spender,et al.  The Resource-Based View: A Review and Assessment of Its Critiques , 2009 .

[50]  Rıfat Kamaşak.  The contribution of tangible and intangible resources, and capabilities to a firm’s profitability and market performance , 2013 .

[51]  Rogerio S. Victer.  The strategic implication of knowledge attributes , 2014 .

[52]  Simone Strambach,et al.  Knowledge-Intensive Business Services (KIBS) as drivers of multilevel knowledge dynamics , 2008, Int. J. Serv. Technol. Manag..

[53]  Francisco J. Acedo,et al.  The resource based theory: dissemination and main trends , 2006 .

[54]  João J. Ferreira,et al.  Resources and capabilities' effects on firm performance: what are they? , 2017, J. Knowl. Manag..

[55]  J. Kilika,et al.  Firm Resources, Core Competencies and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: An Integrative Theoretical Framework , 2016 .

[56]  Michael Stephan,et al.  COMPETENCE-BASED STRATEGIES OF SERVICE TRANSITION , 2010 .