Performance Testing for Superpave and Structural Validation

The primary objective of this full-scale accelerated pavement testing was to evaluate the performance of unmodified and polymer modified asphalt binders and to recommend improved specification tests over existing SUperior PERforming Asphalt PAVEment (Superpave®) binder performance grading methodologies. Candidate replacement tests were evaluated via their ability to discern fatigue cracking resistance and rutting. Two fatigue cracking specification tests were identified as more capable in capturing performance than others: binder yield energy and critical tip opening displacement. Two rutting specification tests that quantify irrecoverable deformations exhibited the best strength to capture rutting: multiple stress creep and recovery and oscillatory-based nonrecoverable stiffness. Based on the full-scale performance and laboratory tests, crumb rubber (recycled tires) modified asphalt (Arizona wet process) was shown to significantly slow or stop the growth of fatigue cracks in a composite asphalt pavement structure. A hybrid technique to modify asphalt with a combination of crumb rubber and conventional polymers (terminally blended) exhibited good fatigue cracking resistance relative to the control binder. Also, a simple addition of polyester fibers to asphalt mix was shown to have high resistance to fatigue cracking without the use of polymer modification. The research study also quantified the capabilities of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program’s mechanistic-empirical pavement design and analysis methodologies to predict rutting and fatigue cracking of modified asphalts that were not captured in the calibration data from the Long-Term Pavement Performance program. Falling weight deflectometer, multidepth deflectometer, and strain gauge instrumentation were used to measure pavement response. The results illustrated that the nationally calibrated mechanistic-empirical performance models could differentiate between structural asphalt thickness but had difficulty differentiating modified from unmodified asphalt binder performance. Nonetheless, the mechanistic-empirical performance ranking and predictions were enhanced and improved using mixture-specific performance tests currently being implemented using the asphalt mixture performance tester.

[1]  M. Emin Kutay,et al.  Conventional and Viscoelastic Continuum Damage (VECD)-Based Fatigue Analysis of Polymer Modified Asphalt Pavements (With Discussion) , 2008 .

[2]  R Bonaquist An assessment of the increased damage potential of wide based single tires , 1992 .

[3]  E Zube,et al.  PROGRESS REPORT ON THE ZACA-WIGMORE EXPERIMENTAL ASPHALT TEST PROJECT , 1959 .

[4]  Matthew W Witczak,et al.  Simple Performance Tests: Summary of Recommended Methods and Database , 2005 .

[5]  W S Mogawer,et al.  VALIDATION OF THE SUPERPAVE ASPHALT BINDER FATIGUE CRACKING PARAMETER USING THE FHWA'S ACCELERATED LOADING FACILITY (WITH DISCUSSION) , 2002 .

[6]  Leonnie Kavanagh A 9-Year Evaluation of Field Cracking and Rutting Performance of SPS-9 Superpave Experiment , 2004 .

[7]  M. Emin Kutay,et al.  Multiaxial Strain Response of Asphalt Concrete Measured During Flow Number Performance Test , 2009 .

[8]  B. Cotterell,et al.  Effects of pre-strain on plane stress ductile fracture in α-brass , 1980 .

[9]  Turner-Fairbank High temperature performance grade specification of asphalt binder from the material ’ s volumetric-flow rate , 2002 .

[10]  Joe P. Mahoney,et al.  EFFECT OF COMPACTION ON ASPHALT CONCRETE PERFORMANCE , 1989 .

[11]  Aroon Shenoy,et al.  A Comprehensive Treatise of the High Temperature Specification Parameter |G*|/(1-(1/tanδsinδ)) for Performance Grading of Asphalts , 2004 .

[12]  Walaa S Mogawer,et al.  VALIDATION OF ASPHALT BINDER AND MIXTURE TESTS THAT MEASURE RUTTING SUSCEPTIBILITY USING THE ACCELERATED LOADING FACILITY , 2000 .

[13]  J B Skog EFFECT OF CHANGES IN ASPHALT PROPERTIES ON PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE: ZACA-WIGMORE TEST ROAD (WITH DISCUSSION) , 1981 .

[14]  John T Harvey,et al.  INFLUENCE OF BINDER LOSS MODULUS ON THE FATIGUE PERFORMANCE OF ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENTS , 1997 .

[15]  Ramon Bonaquist,et al.  Practical application of continuum damage theory to fatigue phenomena in asphalt concrete mixtures , 2005 .

[16]  Ralph Haas,et al.  Effect of field compaction method on fatigue life of asphalt pavements , 1994 .

[17]  K. B. Broberg,et al.  On stable crack growth , 1975 .

[18]  Terence Stanley Arnold,et al.  Determination of Lime in Hot-Mix Asphalt , 2006 .

[19]  Aroon Shenoy,et al.  High Temperature Performance Grading of Asphalts through a Specification Criterion that Could Capture Field Performance , 2004 .

[20]  Aroon Shenoy,et al.  REFINEMENT OF THE SUPERPAVE SPECIFICATION PARAMETER FOR PERFORMANCE GRADING OF ASPHALT , 2001 .

[21]  Y. Richard Kim,et al.  Fatigue Performance Prediction of North Carolina Mixtures Using the Simplified Viscoelastic Continuum Damage Model , 2010 .

[22]  Raj Dongré,et al.  Use of Small Samples to Predict Fatigue Lives of Field Cores , 2009 .

[23]  Adrian Andriescu,et al.  Essential and Plastic Works of Ductile Fracture in Asphalt Binders , 2004 .

[24]  Aroon Shenoy Fatigue testing and evaluation of asphalt binders using the dynamic shear rheometer , 2002 .

[25]  A. Drews Standard Test Method for Softening Point of Bitumen (Ring-and-Ball Apparatus) , 1998 .

[26]  A. Shenoy Nonrecovered compliance from dynamic oscillatory test vis-à-vis nonrecovered compliance from multiple stress creep recovery test in the dynamic shear rheometer , 2008 .

[27]  Ghazi G. Al-Khateeb,et al.  UNDERSTANDING THE PERFORMANCE OF POLYMER MODIFIED BINDERS , 2004 .

[28]  B. Cotterell,et al.  The essential work of plane stress ductile fracture , 1977, International Journal of Fracture.

[29]  R. Leahy,et al.  Performance-Based Properties of Asphalt Concrete Mixes , 1995 .

[30]  J. Harvey,et al.  PERMANENT DEFORMATION RESPONSE OF ASPHALT AGGREGATE MIXES , 1994 .

[31]  Hussain U Bahia,et al.  Developing a Surrogate Test for Fatigue of Asphalt Binders , 2008 .

[32]  Xicheng Qi,et al.  Fatigue cracking characteristics of accelerated testing pavements with modified binders , 2008 .

[33]  Walaa S Mogawer,et al.  UNDERSTANDING THE PERFORMANCE OF MODIFIED APSHALT BINDERS IN MIXTURES: EVALUATION OF MOISTURE SENSITIVITY , 2002 .

[34]  R. E. Link,et al.  Method of Compaction has Significant Effects on Stress-Strain Behavior of Hydraulic Asphalt Concrete , 2009 .

[35]  Balasingam Muhunthan,et al.  An Evaluation of the Effects of Nonlinear Load-Strain Behavior on MEPDG Analysis of Flexible Pavements , 2009 .

[36]  Andy Collop,et al.  Aggregate Orientation and Segregation in Laboratory-Compacted Asphalt Samples , 2004 .

[37]  A. Drews Standard Test Method for Penetration of Bituminous Materials , 1998 .

[38]  Aroon Shenoy,et al.  New Criterion for Superpave High-Temperature Binder Specification , 2004 .

[39]  A. Shenoy,et al.  Material’s Volumetric-Flow Rate (MVR) as a Unification Parameter in Asphalt Rheology and Quality Control / Quality Assurance Tool for High Temperature Performance Grading , 2000 .

[40]  A. Shenoy,et al.  A Method to Estimate the Rheological Properties of Aged Asphalt Binders without Actually aging them , 2002 .

[41]  Ramon Bonaquist,et al.  Analysis of HMA Fatigue Data Using the Concepts of Reduced Loading Cycles and Endurance Limit , 2009 .

[42]  Hussain U Bahia,et al.  Practical Application of Viscoelastic Continuum Damage Theory to Asphalt Binder Fatigue Characterization , 2009 .

[43]  Y. Richard Kim,et al.  VISCOELASTIC CONSTITUTIVE MODEL FOR ASPHALT CONCRETE UNDER CYCLIC LOADING , 1998 .

[44]  Robert L. Lytton,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF PERFORMANCE PREDICTION MODELS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ASPHALT BINDERS AND PAVING MIXES , 1993 .

[45]  Eyad Masad,et al.  Comparing Superpave Gyratory Compactor Data to Field Cores , 2004 .

[46]  John D'Angelo,et al.  Use of the zero shear viscosity as a parameter for the high temperature binder specification parameter , 2002 .

[47]  Dar-Hao Chen,et al.  Overlay Tester , 2007 .

[48]  A. Shenoy High temperature performance grade specification of asphalt binder from the material's volumetric-flow rate , 2001 .

[49]  Y. Richard Kim Viscoelastic Continuum Damage Model , 2012 .

[50]  Adrian Andriescu Essential work of fracture approach to fatigue grading of asphalt binders , 2006 .

[51]  T. Pellinen,et al.  HIRSCH MODEL FOR ESTIMATING THE MODULUS OF ASPHALT CONCRETE , 2003 .

[52]  R M Anderson,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION OF MODIFIED ASPHALT BINDERS IN SUPERPAVE MIX DESIGN , 2001 .

[53]  David A. Anderson,et al.  BINDER CHARACTERIZATION AND EVALUATION. VOLUME 3: PHYSICAL CHARACTERIZATION , 1994 .

[54]  K. Stuart,et al.  VALIDATION OF ASPHALT BINDER AND MIXTURE TESTS THAT PREDICT RUTTING SUSCEPTIBILITY USING THE FHWA ALF (WITH DISCUSSION) , 1997 .