Remote-Controlled Magnetic Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using a New Irrigated-Tip Catheter in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Background—Lack of an irrigated-tip magnetic catheter has limited the role of remote-controlled magnetic navigation (Niobe II, Stereotaxis) for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods and Results—A novel 3.5-mm-tip irrigated magnetic catheter (group 1, Thermocool Navistar RMT, Biosense Webster) was used for 3D left atrial reconstruction (CARTO RMT) and remote-controlled magnetic pulmonary vein isolation. A redesigned catheter was used in group 2. The primary end point was wide area circumferential pulmonary vein isolation confirmed by spiral catheter recording during ablation; secondary end points included procedural data, complications, and AF recurrence. Fifty-six consecutive patients [group 1: 28 patients, 22 males, age 64 (38 to 78) years, left atrium: 47 (34 to 52) mm; paroxysmal AF: n=21, persistent AF: n=7; group 2: 28 patients, 20 males, age 60 (24 to 78) years, left atrium: 40 (35 to 53) mm; paroxysmal AF: n=18, persistent AF: n=10] were included. The primary end point was achieved in a total of 52 of 56 (93%) patients. Median procedure duration was 315 (125 to 550) minutes (group 1: 370 [230 to 550] minutes; group 2: 243 [125 to 450] minutes). Median fluoroscopy exposure to the investigator was reduced by 31%. Tip charring in 17 of 28 (61%) and complications in 3 of 28 (11%) patients in group 1 resulted in a catheter redesign. Sinus rhythm was maintained by 35 of 50 (70%) patients during a median follow-up period of 545 (100 to 683) days. Conclusions—Remote-controlled magnetic AF ablation with real-time verification of pulmonary vein isolation is feasible with a comparable success rate to manual ablation. Safety improved after a redesign of the catheter.

[1]  Douglas Packer,et al.  Prevalence and causes of fatal outcome in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  F. Ouyang,et al.  Remote Robotic Navigation and Electroanatomical Mapping for Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Considerations for Navigation and Impact on Procedural Outcome , 2009, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[3]  H. Lambert,et al.  Novel Contact Force Sensor Incorporated in Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation Catheter Predicts Lesion Size and Incidence of Steam Pop and Thrombus , 2008, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[4]  J. Ruskin,et al.  HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert Consensus Statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for personnel, policy, procedures and follow-up. A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. , 2007, Heart rhythm.

[5]  J. Brachmann,et al.  Atrial fibrillation ablation using a robotic catheter remote control system: initial human experience and long-term follow-up results. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  David O. Martin,et al.  Remote magnetic navigation: human experience in pulmonary vein ablation. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  Claudia Herrera,et al.  Small or Large Isolation Areas Around the Pulmonary Veins for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation?: Results From a Prospective Randomized Study , 2007, Circulation.

[8]  G. Hindricks,et al.  Venice Chart International Consensus Document on Atrial Fibrillation Ablation , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[9]  S. Ernst,et al.  External and Endoluminal Analysis of Left Atrial Anatomy and the Pulmonary Veins in Three‐Dimensional Reconstructions of Magnetic Resonance Angiography: The Full Insight from Inside , 2006, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[10]  Silvia G. Priori,et al.  ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines and the European society of cardiology committee for PRAC , 2006 .

[11]  S. Ernst,et al.  Remote-controlled catheter ablation of accessory pathways: results from the magnetic laboratory. , 2006, European heart journal.

[12]  V. Santinelli,et al.  Robotic magnetic navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  Xingpeng Liu,et al.  Electrophysiological Findings During Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation With Electroanatomic Mapping and Double Lasso Catheter Technique , 2005, Circulation.

[14]  Sabine Ernst,et al.  Complete Isolation of Left Atrium Surrounding the Pulmonary Veins: New Insights From the Double-Lasso Technique in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation , 2004, Circulation.

[15]  S. Ernst,et al.  Initial Experience With Remote Catheter Ablation Using a Novel Magnetic Navigation System: Magnetic Remote Catheter Ablation , 2004, Circulation.

[16]  Sabine Ernst,et al.  Modulation of the slow pathway in the presence of a persistent left superior caval vein using the novel magnetic navigation system Niobe. , 2004, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.