New approaches to characterizing and understanding biofouling of spiral wound membrane systems.

Historically, biofouling research on spiral wound membrane systems is typically problem solving oriented. Membrane modules are studied as black box systems, investigated by autopsies. Biofouling is not a simple process. Many factors influence each other in a non-linear fashion. These features make biofouling a subject which is not easy to study using a fundamental scientific approach. Nevertheless to solve or minimize the negative impacts of biofouling, a clear understanding of the interacting basic principles is needed. Recent research into microbiological characterizing of biofouling, small scale test units, application of in situ visualization methods, and model approaches allow such an integrated study of biofouling.

[1]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Pressure drop increase by biofilm accumulation in spiral wound RO and NF membrane systems: role of substrate concentration, flow velocity, substrate load and flow direction , 2009, Biofouling.

[2]  R. Field,et al.  Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling , 1995 .

[3]  Johannes S. Vrouwenvelder,et al.  Modeling the effect of biofilm formation on reverse osmosis performance: Flux, feed channel pressure drop and solute passage , 2010 .

[4]  J. Howell,et al.  Sub-critical flux operation of microfiltration , 1995 .

[5]  T. Pintelon,et al.  Validation of 3D simulations of reverse osmosis membrane biofouling , 2010, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[6]  Johannes S. Vrouwenvelder,et al.  Three-dimensional modeling of biofouling and fluid dynamics in feed spacer channels of membrane devices , 2009 .

[7]  D. Kooij,et al.  An in situ biofouling monitor for membrane systems , 2003 .

[8]  Raquel Salcedo-Díaz,et al.  Experimental study of concentration polarization in a crossflow reverse osmosis system using Digital Holographic Interferometry , 2010 .

[9]  Wen-Tso Liu,et al.  Biofilm formation characteristics of bacterial isolates retrieved from a reverse osmosis membrane. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Adhesion and biofilm development on suspended carriers in airlift reactors: hydrodynamic conditions versus surface characteristics. , 1997, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[11]  M. Loosdrecht,et al.  Chemical cleaning of biofouling in reverse osmosis membranes evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging , 2010 .

[12]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Biofouling of spiral-wound nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: a feed spacer problem. , 2009, Water research.

[13]  Abraham Marmur,et al.  Super-hydrophobicity fundamentals: implications to biofouling prevention , 2006, Biofouling.

[14]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Biofilm Formation on Reverse Osmosis Membranes Is Initiated and Dominated by Sphingomonas spp , 2010, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[15]  D. Moreno,et al.  Biofouling on the Walls of a Spent Nuclear Fuel Pool with Radioactive Ultrapure Water , 2004, Biofouling.

[16]  Johannes S. Vrouwenvelder,et al.  The Membrane Fouling Simulator: A practical tool for fouling prediction and control , 2006 .

[17]  M. Loosdrecht,et al.  A critical flux to avoid biofouling of spiral wound nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: Fact or fiction? , 2009 .

[18]  Pierre Aimar,et al.  Model for colloidal fouling of membranes , 1995 .

[19]  Lutgarde Raskin,et al.  Impact of microfiltration treatment of secondary wastewater effluent on biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes. , 2010, Water research.

[20]  Johannes S. Vrouwenvelder,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy studies of membrane biofouling , 2008 .