Aiming in adults: Sex and laterality effects

The purpose of the study was to twofold: to investigate gender‐related differences in the asymmetry of aiming with the preferred and non‐preferred hand in right‐handed adults, and to examine the effect of the spatial requirements of the task on these asymmetries. The hypothesis was that if cognitive functions are more asymmetrically localised in men than in women, one should observe greater left–right differences on some variables in men than in women. Eleven men and eleven women were required to aim fast and accurately at one of three possible targets under a choice reaction time protocol. Performance and kinematics data were analysed. Results revealed an effect of target location on the left hand advantage in reaction time, and gender‐related effects on movement time, accuracy, and on the velocity profiles. Overall, women performed more slowly and accurately than men. This gender‐related effect could not be accounted for by differential strategies with regard to speed or accuracy, lending support to the idea that differences exist in the neural mechanisms of movement control between the two genders. Finally, although the results show a hand effect on terminal accuracy in men only, they do not support the hypothesis of a greater asymmetry of movement control in men.

[1]  J. Velay,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry and interhemispheric transferin reaching programming , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  G. Geffen,et al.  Interhemispheric control of manual motor activity , 1994, Behavioural Brain Research.

[3]  J. D. Fisk,et al.  The organization of eye and limb movements during unrestricted reaching to targets in contralateral and ipsilateral visual space , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  M. Goodale,et al.  The effects of unilateral brain damage on visually guided reaching: hemispheric differences in the nature of the deficit , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  C H Chen,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Journal of Motor Behavior Effect of Age and Gender in the Control of Elbow Flexion Movements , 2022 .

[6]  R L Sainburg,et al.  Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  W. Kroll,et al.  Rapid movement kinematic and electromyographic control characteristics in males and females. , 1993, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[8]  D. Ulrich,et al.  Interpreting Statistical Significance and Meaningfulness in Adapted Physical Activity Research , 1998 .

[9]  Deborah L. Harrington,et al.  Hemispheric control of the initial and corrective components of aiming movements , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Philippe Boulinguez,et al.  Influence of the Movement Parameter to Be Controlled on Manual RT Asymmetries in Right-Handers , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[11]  D. Harrington,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry of movement , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[12]  R. Carson Manual asymmetries: in defense of a multifactorial account. , 1989, Journal of motor behavior.

[13]  D. Carey,et al.  Hemispatial differences in visually guided aiming are neither hemispatial nor visual , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  D. Elliott,et al.  Asymmetries in the Preparation and Control of Manual Aiming Movements , 1993 .

[15]  Richard G. Carson,et al.  Manual Asymmetries in the Preparation and Control of Goal-Directed Movements , 2001, Brain and Cognition.

[16]  D. Elliott,et al.  The contribution of vision to asymmetries in manual aiming , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  John L. Bradshaw,et al.  Abduction, adduction and hand differences in simple and serial movements , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  H. Kuypers,et al.  Cerebral control of contralateral and ipsilateral arm, hand and finger movements in the split-brain rhesus monkey. , 1973, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  M. Bryden,et al.  A behavioral measure of hand preference as opposed to hand skill , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  Digby Elliott,et al.  Hand, Space and Attentional Asymmetries in Goal-Directed Manual Aiming * * Presented at the Canadian Society for Psychomotor Learning and Sport Psychology (SCAPPS), Vancouver, B.C., Canada. October 1995. , 1997, Cortex.

[21]  R. Carson,et al.  Manual asymmetries: feedback processing, output variability, and spatial complexity-resolving some inconsistencies. , 1989, Journal of motor behavior.

[22]  Romeo Chua,et al.  Discrete vs. continuous visual control of manual aiming , 1991 .

[23]  Steven M. Finbeiner,et al.  The Neural and Behavioral Organization of Goal-Directed Movements , 1989, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.