A generalization of the local graduai deformation method using domain parameterization

Reservoir model needs to be constrained by various data, including dynamic production data. Reservoir heterogeneities are usually described using geostatistical approaches. Constraining geological/geostatistical model realizations by dynamic data is generally performed through history matching, which is a complex inversion process and requires a parameterization of the geostatistical realizations for model updating. However, the parameterization techniques are still not very efficient and need to be improved.In recent years, the local gradual deformation method has been widely used to parameterize geostatistical realizations. The domain deformation technique has also been developed to improve the history matching efficiency. Both methods can smoothly modify model realizations while conserving spatial geostatistical properties. The first one consists in locally combining two or more realizations while the second one allows the optimization process to change the model realization via the variation of the shape of geometrical domains. In this paper, we generalize the local gradual deformation method by adding the possibility to change the geometry of local zones through the domain deformation. This generalization provides a greater flexibility in the definition of the local domains for the local gradual deformation method. In addition, we propose a new way to initialize the realization which guarantees a good initial point for the optimization and potentially improves the efficiency of history matching. HighlightsPresentation of a new parameterization method for history matching problems.Combination of the local gradual deformation method and the domain deformation method.Good numerical results on three test cases.

[1]  M. Boucher,et al.  Interpretation of Interference Tests in a Well Field Using Geostatistical Techniques to Fit the Permeability Distribution in a Reservoir Model , 1984 .

[2]  Frederic Roggero,et al.  History Matching Using Local Gradual Deformation , 2007 .

[3]  Didier Yu Ding,et al.  An Integrated Parameterization and Optimization Methodology for Assisted History Matching: Application to Libyan Field Case , 2012 .

[4]  Jef Caers,et al.  Regional probability perturbations for history matching , 2005 .

[5]  Y. Chen,et al.  Extended Brugge benchmark case for history matching and water flooding optimization , 2013, Comput. Geosci..

[6]  J. W. Barker,et al.  Quantifying Uncertainty in Production Forecasts: Another Look at the PUNQ-S3 Problem , 2001 .

[7]  Benoit Noetinger,et al.  The FFT Moving Average (FFT-MA) Generator: An Efficient Numerical Method for Generating and Conditioning Gaussian Simulations , 2000 .

[8]  Didier Yu Ding,et al.  History Matching Geostatistical Model Realizations Using a Geometrical Domain Based Parameterization Technique , 2010 .

[9]  Didier Yu Ding,et al.  Matching of Production History and 4D Seismic Data--Application to the Girassol Field, Offshore Angola , 2007 .

[10]  Dennis Denney,et al.  Results of the Brugge Benchmark Study for Flooding Optimization and History Matching , 2009 .

[11]  L. Hu,et al.  Combination of Dependent Realizations Within the Gradual Deformation Method , 2002 .

[12]  John W. Barker,et al.  Quantifying Uncertainty in Production Forecasts: Another Look at the PUNQ-S3 Problem , 2000 .

[13]  Jef Caers,et al.  Geostatistical History Matching Using a Regional Probability Perturbation Method , 2003 .

[14]  Mathilde Peyrega Optimisation sans dérivées sous contraintes , 2016 .

[15]  Chaohui Chen,et al.  Closed-loop reservoir management on the Brugge test case , 2010 .

[16]  L. Hu,et al.  Gradual Deformation of Continuous Geostatistical Models for History Matching , 1998 .

[17]  L. Y. Hu,et al.  Production Data Integration Using a Gradual Deformation Approach: Application to an Oil Field (Offshore Brazil) , 2000 .