Mapping of ecosystem services: Missing links between purposes and procedures

Abstract The literature on ecosystem services mapping presents a diversity of procedures whose consistency might question the reliability of maps for decision-making. This study aims at analyzing the correspondence between the purpose of maps (e.g. land use planning) and the procedures used for mapping (e.g. benefit transfer, ecological transfer). Fifty scientific studies published between 2005 and 2012 were selected and analyzed according to 19 variables, applying independence tests over contingency tables, ANOVA and regression analysis. The results show that most studies declared a decision-making purpose (82%), which in 50% of the cases, was land use planning. Only few relationships were found between variables selected to describe the purpose of the maps and those selected to describe the mapping procedures. Thus for example, maps aimed at supporting land use planning did not include any level of stakeholder participation or scenario analysis, as it would have been expected given this purpose. Likewise, maps were based on either economic value or biophysical transfers, regardless of the spatial and temporal scales of mapping. This generally weak relation between map׳s purposes with the used procedures could explain the still restricted incidence of ES on decision-making by limiting the transmission, comparison and synthesis of results.

[1]  Simone Maynard,et al.  The Development of an Ecosystem Services Framework for South East Queensland , 2010, Environmental management.

[2]  C. Dormann,et al.  A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead , 2011 .

[3]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[4]  Gary W. Johnson,et al.  ARIES (ARtificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services ): a new tool for ecosystem services assessment, planning, and valuation. , 2009 .

[5]  Yang Zhen,et al.  Assessing value of grassland ecosystem services in Gansu Province, northwest of China , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[6]  Stewart Thompson,et al.  Maximising the natural capital benefits of habitat creation: Spatially targeting native woodland using GIS , 2006 .

[7]  James A. Roumasset,et al.  Valuing indirect ecosystem services: the case of tropical watersheds , 2002, Environment and Development Economics.

[8]  Jing Li,et al.  Ecosystem services and their values: a case study in the Qinba mountains of China , 2006, Ecological Research.

[9]  Jayanath Ananda,et al.  A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning , 2009 .

[10]  G. Daily,et al.  Ecosystem Services in Decision Making: Time to Deliver , 2009 .

[11]  Franz Makeschin,et al.  A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning , 2012 .

[12]  Darius J. Semmens,et al.  Social values for ecosystem services (SolVES): Documentation and user manual, version 2.0 , 2012 .

[13]  E. Bennett,et al.  Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: A conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery , 2013 .

[14]  D. Semmens,et al.  A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services , 2011 .

[15]  F. Müller,et al.  Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets , 2012 .

[16]  G. Daily,et al.  Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales , 2009 .

[17]  Pamela A Matson,et al.  Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  R. Costanza,et al.  Global Conservation of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services , 2007 .

[19]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[20]  A. Newton,et al.  Cost–benefit analysis of ecological networks assessed through spatial analysis of ecosystem services , 2012 .

[21]  Chris Frid,et al.  Ecosystem Ecology , 2018, Encyclopedia of Theoretical Ecology.

[22]  R. Cowling,et al.  Ecosystem Services, Land-Cover Change, and Stakeholders: Finding a Sustainable Foothold for a Semiarid Biodiversity Hotspot , 2009 .

[23]  James R.A. Butler,et al.  A catchment-based approach to mapping hydrological ecosystem services using riparian habitat: A case study from the Wet Tropics, Australia , 2010 .

[24]  H. Wittmer,et al.  “Maps have an air of authority”: Potential benefits and challenges of ecosystem service maps at different levels of decision making , 2013 .

[25]  Pushpam Kumar,et al.  The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity : mainstreaming the economics of nature : a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB , 2010 .

[26]  G. Daily,et al.  The Ecosystem Services Framework and Natural Capital Conservation , 2008 .

[27]  Iris Heller,et al.  Assessing Landscape Functions with Broad-Scale Environmental Data: Insights Gained from a Prototype Development for Europe , 2009, Environmental management.

[28]  Yuqing Shi,et al.  A GIS-based approach for quantifying and mapping carbon sink and stock values of forest ecosystem: A case study , 2011 .

[29]  Stephen Polasky,et al.  Mapping and Valuing Ecosystem Services as an Approach for Conservation and Natural‐Resource Management , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Patricia Balvanera,et al.  Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review , 2012 .

[31]  D. Richardson,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management , 2008 .

[32]  Malte Busch,et al.  Potentials of quantitative and qualitative approaches to assessing ecosystem services , 2012 .

[33]  Kenneth A. Baerenklau,et al.  Spatial allocation of forest recreation value , 2010 .

[34]  Louise Willemen,et al.  A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services , 2013 .

[35]  Nengwang Chen,et al.  A GIS-based approach for mapping direct use value of ecosystem services at a county scale: Management implications , 2009 .

[36]  L. Hein,et al.  Spatial characterization of landscape functions , 2008 .

[37]  E. Oteros‐Rozas,et al.  Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level , 2013 .

[38]  T. Lynam,et al.  Measuring conditions and trends in ecosystem services at multiple scales: the Southern African Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (SAfMA) experience , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  Brendan Fisher,et al.  Ecosystem valuation: some principles and a partial application , 2011 .

[40]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data , 2011 .

[41]  Sandra Lavorel,et al.  Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services , 2011 .

[42]  Karen J. Esler,et al.  Stakeholder perceptions of an ecosystem services approach to clearing invasive alien plants on private land. , 2013 .

[43]  Mark E. Miller,et al.  Prioritizing Conservation Effort through the Use of Biological Soil Crusts as Ecosystem Function Indicators in an Arid Region , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[44]  M. Reed.  Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review , 2008 .

[45]  Nora Fagerholm,et al.  Community stakeholders’ knowledge in landscape assessments – Mapping indicators for landscape services , 2012 .

[46]  B. Grizzetti,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union , 2012 .

[47]  J. Randolph.  Environmental Land Use Planning and Management , 2003 .

[48]  R. Costanza,et al.  Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  E. F. Viglizzo,et al.  Land-use options for Del Plata Basin in South America: Tradeoffs analysis based on ecosystem service provision , 2006 .

[50]  Nadarajah Sriskandarajah,et al.  Education and Resilience: Social and Situated Learning among University and Secondary Students , 2009 .

[51]  A. Troy,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services: Practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer , 2006 .

[52]  R. DeFries,et al.  Framing Sustainability in a Telecoupled World , 2013, Ecology and Society.

[53]  Gretchen C Daily,et al.  Economic value of tropical forest to coffee production. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  José M. Paruelo,et al.  Ecosystem service evaluation to support land-use policy , 2012 .

[55]  Brett A. Bryan,et al.  Modelling and mapping agricultural opportunity costs to guide landscape planning for natural resource management , 2011 .

[56]  R. Haines-Young,et al.  Ecosystem Ecology: The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being , 2010 .

[57]  M. Schelhaas,et al.  A spatial assessment of ecosystem services in Europe: Methods, case studies and policy analysis - phase 1 , 2011 .

[58]  Esteban G. Jobbágy,et al.  Valoración de Servicios Ecosistémicos. Conceptos, herramientas y aplicaciones para el ordenamiento territorial , 2011 .

[59]  B. Bryan,et al.  Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services , 2009 .

[60]  Laura Nahuelhual,et al.  Mapping recreation and ecotourism as a cultural ecosystem service: an application at the local level in Southern Chile. , 2013 .

[61]  M. Rounsevell,et al.  The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change , 2006 .

[62]  A. Marshall,et al.  Mapping socio-economic scenarios of land cover change: a GIS method to enable ecosystem service modelling. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.