Ecological resource potential

The ecological resource potential (ERP) method allows to calculate the amount of one material that can potentially be produced within Earth system boundaries, if no other anthropogenic activity would take place. It indicates the uppermost potential of one resource extracted, processed and disposed after use with a specific set of technologies and a defined probability of violating Earth system boundaries. This method is an adaption of the ecological resource availability (ERA) method, which calculates the amount of a resource that can be produced within an allocated share of the global boundaries, i.e. when considering all other anthropogenic activities. While more realistic, its allocation can be done in multiple ways and based on a variety of different objectives, which requires scenario modelling. The ERP method, in contrary, only requires information on environmental impacts from resource extraction, processing, and final disposal. The customization of the original ERA method comprises:• Omitting all steps for allocating global boundaries to single resources or resource segments.• Changing the calculation procedure so that ERP is calculated for each resource separately.

[1]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  The second law, the fourth law, recycling and limits to growth , 1999 .

[2]  Roland Hischier,et al.  Resource pressure – A circular design method , 2021, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[3]  F. Chapin,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity , 2009 .

[4]  Jonathan M Cullen,et al.  Mapping the global flow of steel: from steelmaking to end-use goods. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Ulrich Kral,et al.  Sustainable resource use requires “clean cycles” and safe “final sinks” , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[6]  Gregor Wernet,et al.  The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[7]  Neil D. Burgess,et al.  An Ecoregion-Based Approach to Protecting Half the Terrestrial Realm , 2017, Bioscience.

[8]  Julian M. Allwood,et al.  Theoretical efficiency limits for energy conversion devices , 2010 .

[9]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet , 2015, Science.

[10]  R. Hischier,et al.  Ecological resource availability: a method to estimate resource budgets for a sustainable economy , 2020, Global Sustainability.

[11]  M. Hauschild,et al.  How to bring absolute sustainability into decision-making: An industry case study using a Planetary Boundary-based methodology. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[12]  M. Scheffer,et al.  Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  A new method for analyzing sustainability performance of global supply chains and its application to material resources. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[14]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Development of a life-cycle impact assessment methodology linked to the Planetary Boundaries framework , 2018 .

[15]  Rolf Widmer,et al.  Powering a Sustainable and Circular Economy—An Engineering Approach to Estimating Renewable Energy Potentials within Earth System Boundaries , 2019, Energies.

[16]  S. Hashimoto,et al.  Revealing the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of materials: The Japanese case , 2017, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[17]  Karolin Frankenberger,et al.  A circular economy within the planetary boundaries: Towards a resource-based, systemic approach , 2020 .

[18]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.