Organizational Resources in the Service of School-Wide Ambitious Teaching Practice

Background/Context “Ambitious teaching” is teaching that aims to teach all kinds of students to not only to know academic subjects, but also to be able to use what they know in working on authentic problems in academic domains. Studies of individual teachers have identified the challenges of this work. Resources are often provided at the school level with the purpose of making this kind of teaching more common. But as Cohen, Raudenbusch, and Ball (2003) point out, it is not making resources available to a school that matters in improving instruction, but getting those resources to be used in instructional interactions where teachers and students work together to get academic content learned. Purpose/Objective The purpose of this case study was to understand how the common use of resources across a school functions to enable those resources to make their way into the instructional stream.1 First, the use of shared social, intellectual, and material resources was investigated in consistently ambitious teaching across diverse classes and teachers in the school. Using a conceptual frame from social practice theory, we then examined how resources in use shaped teachers’ common interpretations of teaching problems and common assumptions about appropriate solutions. Research Design Qualitative case study based on extensive observation and interviews. Conclusions/Recommendations As a field, we need to provide images and narratives for ambitious teaching that is scaffolded in such a way that one can be a mere mortal and yet capably meet its routine demands. In this paper we have tried to provide one such image. We can offer several strong hypotheses based on this casework; the first is that ambitious teaching is more manageable when it is undertaken collectively, when it is supported by common materials, and when it has an intellectual underpinning that is useful and routinely used. Ambitious teaching is made more sustainable when a multiplicity of resources are drawn upon in concert, not installed one at a time and delivered to individual practitioners. We have tried to illustrate the strong role that an organization can play in the development of widespread ambitious teaching. In this image the organization supports ambitious teaching in such a way that most teachers can see, enact, and routinely articulate, this approach.

[1]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Resources, Instruction, and Research , 2003 .

[2]  Liping Ma,et al.  Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics Teachers' Understanding of Fundamental Mathematics in China and the United States , 2010 .

[3]  Catherine E. Snow,et al.  Knowledge to Support the Teaching of Reading: Preparing Teachers for a Changing World , 2005 .

[4]  L. Darling-Hammond,et al.  Authentic assessment in action : studies of schools and students at work , 1995 .

[5]  E. Gordon,et al.  Affirmative development : cultivating academic ability , 2007 .

[6]  D. Ball With an Eye on the Mathematical Horizon: Dilemmas of Teaching Elementary School Mathematics , 1993, The Elementary School Journal.

[7]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[8]  Fred M. Newmann,et al.  School instructional program coherence: Benefits and challenges. , 2001 .

[9]  Jeremy Kilpatrick,et al.  Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics , 2013 .

[10]  Charalambos Y. Charalambous,et al.  Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching and the Mathematical Quality of Instruction: An Exploratory Study , 2008 .

[11]  R. Miettinen,et al.  Epistemic Objects, Artefacts and Organizational Change , 2005 .

[12]  S. Lubienski,et al.  Problem Solving as a Means toward Mathematics for All: An Exploratory Look through a Class Lens , 2000 .

[13]  Lesley A. Rex,et al.  Teachers’ Pedagogical Stories and the Shaping of Classroom Participation: “The Dancer” and “Graveyard Shift at the 7-11” , 2002 .

[14]  R. Linn,et al.  Qualitative methods in research on teaching , 1985 .

[15]  Martin B. Meznar,et al.  The Social Construction of Organizational Learning: Conceptual and Practical Issues in the Field , 1995 .

[16]  J. Little,et al.  Inside Teacher Community: Representations of Classroom Practice. , 2003 .

[17]  J. Bransford,et al.  How students learn : history, mathematics, and science in the classroom , 2005 .

[18]  J. Little,et al.  Career and Commitment in the Context of Comprehensive School Reform , 2002 .

[19]  Susan Gasson,et al.  The Dynamics of Sensemaking, Knowledge, and Expertise in Collaborative, Boundary-Spanning Design , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[20]  School Instructional Program Coherence: Benefits and Challenges. Improving Chicago's Schools. , 2001 .

[21]  David Middleton,et al.  Cognition and communication at work: Introduction: Studying work as mindful practice , 1996 .

[22]  Filippo Graziani,et al.  Instructional Activities as a Tool for Teachers' and Teacher Educators' Learning , 2009, The Elementary School Journal.

[23]  H. Widdowson,et al.  Teaching Language as Communication , 1979 .

[24]  Ilana Seidel Horn,et al.  Learning on the Job: A Situated Account of Teacher Learning in High School Mathematics Departments , 2005 .

[25]  Lucia M. Flevares,et al.  Teachers’ Responses to Student Mistakes in Chinese and U.S. Mathematics Classrooms , 2007, The Elementary School Journal.

[26]  J. Little Norms of Collegiality and Experimentation: Workplace Conditions of School Success , 1982 .

[27]  E. Kazemi,et al.  Discourse That Promotes Conceptual Understanding. , 1998 .

[28]  Lesley A. Rex,et al.  Researching the Complexity of Classroom Interaction , 2006 .

[29]  Magdalene Lampert,et al.  Teaching Problems and the Problems of Teaching , 2001 .

[30]  Mastodons, Maps, and Michigan: Exploring Uncharted Territory while Teaching Elementary School Social Studies. Elementary Subjects Center Series No. 24. , 1990 .

[31]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[32]  Michael D. Steele,et al.  Seeing the Complexity of Standing to the Side: Instructional Dialogues , 2005 .

[33]  R. Jaeger,et al.  Complementary Methods for Research in Education , 1988 .

[34]  R. Bain Rounding Up Unusual Suspects: Facing the Authority Hidden in the History Classroom. , 2006 .

[35]  Suzanne M. Wilson Inside teaching: How classroom life undermines reform , 2006 .

[36]  D. Yanow Seeing Organizational Learning: A `Cultural' View , 2000 .

[37]  William McClune,et al.  How Students Learn , 2010 .

[38]  G. Leinhardt Instructional explanations in history , 1997 .

[39]  Joshua L. Glazer Educational professionalism: The development of a practice-centered frame and its application to the America's Choice school design. , 2005 .

[40]  Diane Larsen-Freeman,et al.  Teaching Language: From Grammar to Grammaring , 2003 .

[41]  K. Weick How Professional Organizations Work: Implications for School Organization & Management , 2002 .

[42]  Fred M. Newmann,et al.  Instruction and Achievement in Chicago Elementary Schools. Improving Chicago's Schools. , 2001 .

[43]  Margaret S. Smith,et al.  Orchestrating Productive Mathematical Discussions: Five Practices for Helping Teachers Move Beyond Show and Tell , 2008 .

[44]  L. Corno On Teaching Adaptively , 2008 .

[45]  G. Goth National standards. , 2006, Healthcare informatics : the business magazine for information and communication systems.

[46]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving , 1989, Distributed Artificial Intelligence.

[47]  S. J. Rosenholtz Teacher's workplace : the social organization of schools , 1991 .

[48]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  Knowing in Organizations: A Practice-Based Approach , 2003 .

[49]  Carol D. Lee Is October Brown Chinese? A Cultural Modeling Activity System for Underachieving Students , 2001 .

[50]  Andreas Reckwitz Toward a Theory of Social Practices , 2002 .

[51]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[52]  J. Talbert,et al.  Professional Communities and the Work of High School Teaching , 2001 .

[53]  Andrew C. Porter,et al.  External Standards and Good Teaching: The Pros and Cons of Telling Teachers What to Do , 1988 .