How Healthcare Organizations Use the Internet to Market Quality Achievements

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The increasingly competitive environment is having a strong bearing on the strategic marketing practices of hospitals. The Internet is a fairly new marketing tool, and it has the potential to dramatically influence healthcare consumers. This exploratory study investigates how hospitals use the Internet as a tool to market the quality of their services. Significant evidence exists that customers use the Internet to find information about potential healthcare providers, including information concerning quality. Data were collected from a random sample of 45 U.S. hospitals from the American Hospital Association database. The data included hospital affiliation, number of staffed beds, accreditation status, Joint Commission quality awards, and number of competing hospitals. The study's findings show that system‐affiliated hospitals do not provide more, or less, quality information on their websites than do non‐systemaffiliated hospitals. The findings suggest that the amount of quality information provided on a hospital website is not dependent on hospital size. Research provides evidence that hospitals with more Joint Commission awards promote their quality accomplishments more so than their counterparts that earned fewer Joint Commission awards. The findings also suggest that the more competitors in a marketplace the more likely a hospital is to promote its quality as a potential differential advantage. The study's findings indicate that a necessary element of any hospital's competitive strategy should be to include the marketing of its quality on the organization's website.

[1]  S. Altan Erdem,et al.  The role of the Internet in physician–patient relationships: The issue of trust , 2006 .

[2]  Steven A. Taylor,et al.  Distinguishing service quality from patient satisfaction in developing health care marketing strategies. , 1994, Hospital & health services administration.

[3]  H R Rubin,et al.  The advantages and disadvantages of process-based measures of health care quality. , 2001, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[4]  Steven A. Taylor,et al.  Servperf versus Servqual: Reconciling Performance-Based and Perceptions-Minus-Expectations Measurement of Service Quality , 1994 .

[5]  K. Kerwin The role of the Internet in improving healthcare quality. , 2002, Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives.

[6]  J. J. Cronin,et al.  Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments , 2000 .

[7]  H. Commandeur,et al.  The impact of quality on store loyalty: A contingency approach , 2001 .

[8]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Constructive Consumer Choice Processes , 1998 .

[9]  S Erdem Healthcare Marketing on the Web: Moving Forward Toward More Interactive Practices , 2007, Health marketing quarterly.

[10]  D. Wittink,et al.  A model of consumer perceptions and store loyalty intentions for a supermarket retailer , 1998 .

[11]  J. J. Cronin,et al.  Some New Thoughts on Conceptualizing Perceived Service Quality: A Hierarchical Approach , 2001 .

[12]  J. J. Cronin,et al.  Removing the contextual lens: A multinational, multi-setting comparison of service evaluation models , 2005 .

[13]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Interactive Home Shopping: Consumer, Retailer, and Manufacturer Incentives to Participate in Electronic Marketplaces , 1997 .

[14]  V. Zeithaml Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence: , 1988 .

[15]  Emin Babakus,et al.  Does customer sex influence the relationship between perceived quality and share of wallet , 2008 .

[16]  V. Podichetty,et al.  Assessment of internet use and effects among healthcare professionals: a cross sectional survey , 2006, Postgraduate Medical Journal.

[17]  C. Fornell,et al.  The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, Purpose, and Findings , 1996 .