Discussing Equity and Social Exclusion in Accessibility Evaluations

Ex ante evaluations of transport policy options (including infrastructure plans) are generally based on cost-benefit analyses (CBA). Accessibility changes are included in such analyses indirectly, via a utilitarian perspective. But accessibility is broader than is assumed by this perspective and also incorporates equity and related distribution effects as well as social exclusion. This paper aims to give an overview of the relevance of distribution effects and equity, and social exclusion for accessibility, based on the literature. The most important conclusions of our paper is that the two subjects are poorly addressed in transport appraisal in general, and in CBA in particular. Additional ethical theories could add value to the utilitarian perspective, egalitarian theories being a major competitor. Equity analysis is however complex because there are several types of equity, various ways to categorize people for equity analysis, numerous impacts to consider, and various ways of measuring these impacts. And such analysis requires normative judgements, in addition to simply presenting distribution effects. Several options are available to express distribution effects. Important choices to be made if such effects need to be reported relate to the unit of comparison (e.g. the household versus the individual), the indicator to be used, and the value of each unit to be compared (e.g. accessibility) for all units of comparison (e.g. households). We also conclude that CBA is not suitable for evaluating social exclusion policies. Based on this overview we propose an agenda for potential future research in the area of ethics and accessibility.

[1]  H. Meurs,et al.  Spatial structure and mobility , 2001 .

[2]  T. Hoorn,et al.  The logsum as an evaluation measure - review of the literature and new results , 2007 .

[3]  W. E. Silver,et al.  Economics and Information Theory , 1967 .

[4]  M. Kwan.  Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: a comparative analysis using a point-based framework , 2010 .

[5]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Moving from trip-based to activity-based measures of accessibility , 2006 .

[6]  M. Horner,et al.  The role of urban form in shaping access to opportunities An exploratory spatial data analysis , 2008 .

[7]  S Grant-Muller,et al.  Incorporating equity considerations in transport infrastructure evaluation: Current practice and a proposed methodology. , 2009, Evaluation and program planning.

[8]  Geoffrey J. D. Hewings,et al.  Transport–Regional Equity Issue Revisited , 2010 .

[9]  Harry Timmermans,et al.  The effect of location, mobility and socio-demographic factors on task and time allocation of households , 2007 .

[10]  C. Allen,et al.  Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , 2011 .

[11]  Richard R. Gaillardetz,et al.  Making the Connections , 2002 .

[12]  Karen Lucas,et al.  Assessing the 'value' of new transport initiatives in deprived neighbourhoods in the UK , 2007 .

[13]  Bert Van Wee,et al.  Option Value of Public Transport: Methodology for Measurement and Case Study for Regional Rail Links in the Netherlands , 2006 .

[14]  Farideh Ramjerdi,et al.  Equity Measures and Their Performance in Transportation , 2006 .

[15]  Bert van Wee,et al.  Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions , 2004 .

[16]  Michiel de Bok,et al.  Accessibility appraisal of land-use/transport policy strategies: More than just adding up travel-time savings , 2010 .

[17]  Amartya Sen,et al.  Handbook of Income Inequality Measurement , 1999 .

[18]  E. Verhoef,et al.  Evaluating the effects of urban congestion pricing: geographical accessibility versus social surplus , 2011 .

[19]  A. Furlong,et al.  Youth Unemployment in Rural Areas , 2000 .

[20]  J. G. Koenig,et al.  Indicators of urban accessibility: Theory and application , 1980 .

[21]  Tijs Neutens.  Space, time and accessibility: analyzing human activities and travel possibilities from a time-geographic perspective , 2010 .

[22]  R. Pielke,et al.  Vulnerability and Risk: Some Thoughts from a Political and Policy Perspective , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[23]  M. Glachant,et al.  Distributional effects of public transport policies in the Paris Region , 2011 .

[24]  Darren M. Scott,et al.  Examining the role of urban form in shaping people's accessibility to opportunities: an exploratory spatial data analysis , 2008 .

[25]  Qing Shen,et al.  Commuting Inequality between Cars and Public Transit: The Case of the San Francisco Bay Area, 1990-2000 , 2007 .

[26]  Thomas W Sanchez.  Poverty, policy, and public transportation , 2008 .

[27]  Shunfeng Song,et al.  Some Tests of Alternative Accessibility Measures: A Population Density Approach , 1996 .

[28]  Karel Martens,et al.  Basing Transport Planning on Principles of Social Justice , 2011 .

[29]  Todd Litman,et al.  Evaluating Transportation Equity Guidance For Incorporating Distributional Impacts in Transportation Planning , 2015 .

[30]  A. Atkinson.  On the measurement of inequality , 1970 .

[31]  John Stanley,et al.  Growing bus patronage and addressing transport disadvantage--The Melbourne experience , 2009 .

[32]  Graham Currie,et al.  Investigating links between transport disadvantage, social exclusion and well-being in Melbourne: preliminary results , 2007 .

[33]  Mei-Po Kwan,et al.  The Internet, mobile phone and space-time constraints , 2008 .

[34]  Susan Grant-Muller,et al.  Economic appraisal of European transport projects: The state-of-the-art revisited , 2001 .

[35]  G. Currie,et al.  Using Lorenz Curves to Assess Public Transit Equity , 2011 .

[36]  L. Steg,et al.  The role of revenue use in the acceptability of transport pricing policies , 2008 .

[37]  Johannes Bröcker,et al.  Assessing Spatial Equity and Efficiency Impacts of Transport Infrastructure Projects , 2010 .

[38]  Graham Currie,et al.  Social Exclusion and the Value of Mobility , 2011 .

[39]  Debbie A. Niemeier,et al.  Accessibility: an evaluation using consumer welfare , 1997 .

[40]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Distributional impacts of changing from a gasoline tax to a vehicle-mile tax for light vehicles: A case study of Oregon , 2010 .

[41]  Karst Teunis Geurs,et al.  Accessibility measures: review and applications. Evaluation of accessibility impacts of land-use transportation scenarios, and related social and economic impact , 2001 .

[42]  I. Olkin,et al.  Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications , 1980 .

[43]  Karen Lucas,et al.  Transport, the Environment and Social Exclusion , 2001 .

[44]  F. Rajé,et al.  The impact of transport on social exclusion processes with specific emphasis on road user charging , 2003 .

[45]  Debbie A. Niemeier,et al.  Measuring Accessibility: An Exploration of Issues and Alternatives , 1997 .

[46]  Concepción Román,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Index to Measure the Accessibility Impacts of New Infrastructure Investments: The Case of the High- speed Train Corridor Madrid-Barcelona-French Border , 2004 .

[47]  A. Condeço-Melhorado,et al.  Spatial impacts of road pricing: Accessibility, regional spillovers and territorial cohesion , 2011 .

[48]  John Farrington,et al.  Rural accessibility, social inclusion and social justice: towards conceptualisation , 2005 .

[49]  D. Levinson.  Equity Effects of Road Pricing: A Review , 2010 .

[50]  Lukas H. Meyer,et al.  Enough for the Future , 2009 .

[51]  Gordon Pirie,et al.  Measuring Accessibility: A Review and Proposal , 1979 .

[52]  Dianne A. Vella-Brodrick,et al.  The usefulness of social exclusion to inform social policy in transport , 2009 .