Spatial statistical analysis for the design of indoor particle-filter-based localization mechanisms

The accurate localization of end-users and resources is seen as one of the main pillars toward the successful implementation of context-based applications. While current outdoor localization mechanisms fulfill most application requirements, the design of accurate indoor localization mechanisms is still an open issue. Most research efforts are focusing on the design of mechanisms making use of the receiver signal strength indications generated by WLAN (wireless local area network) devices. However, the accuracy and robustness of such mechanisms can be severely compromised due to the random and unpredictable nature of radio channels. In this article, we develop a methodology incorporating various algorithms capable of coping with the unpredictable nature of radio channels. Following a holistic approach, we start by identifying the wireless equipment parameter setting, better meeting the implementation requirements of a robust indoor localization mechanism. We then make use of RANdom SAmple Consensus paradigm: a robust model-fitting mechanism capable of smoothing the data captured during the space survey. Using an experimental setup, we evaluate the benefits of integrating the floor plan and an ordinary Kriging interpolation algorithm in the estimation process. Our main findings show that our proposal can greatly improve the quality of the information to be used in the development of particle-filter-based indoor localization mechanisms.

[1]  Bing-Fei Wu,et al.  Particle-Filter-Based Radio Localization for Mobile Robots in the Environments With Low-Density WLAN APs , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[2]  Hao Jiang,et al.  Fusion of WiFi, Smartphone Sensors and Landmarks Using the Kalman Filter for Indoor Localization , 2015, Sensors.

[3]  David C. Moore,et al.  Robust distributed network localization with noisy range measurements , 2004, SenSys '04.

[4]  F. Gustafsson,et al.  Mobile positioning using wireless networks: possibilities and fundamental limitations based on available wireless network measurements , 2005, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[5]  Lars Kulik,et al.  Spatial interpolation in wireless sensor networks: localized algorithms for variogram modeling and Kriging , 2010, GeoInformatica.

[6]  Jesús Martínez Gómez,et al.  Combining invariant features and localization techniques for visual place classification: successful experiences in the robotVision@ImageCLEF competition , 2011 .

[7]  Jyh-Ching Juang,et al.  Outlier-Detection-Based Indoor Localization System for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2012 .

[8]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[9]  K.J.R. Liu,et al.  Signal processing techniques in network-aided positioning: a survey of state-of-the-art positioning designs , 2005, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[10]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Robust Monte Carlo localization for mobile robots , 2001, Artif. Intell..

[11]  Roger Woodard,et al.  Interpolation of Spatial Data: Some Theory for Kriging , 1999, Technometrics.

[12]  Santiago Mazuelas,et al.  Robust Indoor Positioning Provided by Real-Time RSSI Values in Unmodified WLAN Networks , 2009, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[13]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Wireless communications - principles and practice , 1996 .

[14]  M. Friedman A Comparison of Alternative Tests of Significance for the Problem of $m$ Rankings , 1940 .