Digital calendars for flexible organizational routines

Purpose Online calendar services (OCS) are primarily used for temporal orientation and reminding. Nonetheless, calendar work may also entail generic activities such as scheduling, tracking, archive and recall and retrieval which are not adequately supported by available systems. The purpose of the paper is to explore how online calendaring may be re-configured and re-aligned to alleviate these shortcomings, thus servicing accountability in team work and flexibility in organizational routines. Design/methodology/approach Following a design science research methodology, the authors review “justifiable failures” or deliberate non-use of OCS and establish the rationale for, design and evaluate a digital service that configures calendaring as an ecology of separate digital materials supporting file-, photo- and video-sharing services, online argumentation, project/task management and social bookmarking. The new service is a digital composite of materials that incrementally co-adapt and co-evolve to serve primary and secondary work-oriented activities. The authors assess the value of the digital composite in two empirical settings and discuss intrinsic features that create new possibilities for action. Findings The authors present the rationale, design, implementation and evaluation of a new digital composite calendaring service which is deployed in two empirical settings, namely group vacation planning and collective information management. Each case features different re-configurations of calendaring to serve human intentions. In vacation planning, the digital composite of the calendar operates as a mashup allowing peers to negotiate, schedule and track vacation options and archive, recall or retrieve digital memories of vacations. In the case of collective information management, the digital composite is further augmented so as to re-align performative and ostensive aspects of routines in a regional organic farming partnership. Practical implications Digital composites rely on the interdependent operation of different bounded systems and services to establish configured ecologies of (previously) separate digital artifacts. The practical implications of digital composites are that they can appropriate performative capacities which are already established and embedded across different settings. As a result, they enact complex digital assemblages which can re-align not only daily activities but also organizational routines. On the other hand, digital composites remain in flux, since their state, at any moment in time, is partly determined (even temporarily) by the state of their constituent parts. Originality/value Calendaring as presented in this paper defines a genre of digital artifacts that promote flexible and accountable collaborative work while exploiting material agency and resources distributed across digital settings. As such, it establishes a kind of meta-material that invokes collective social agency, thus re-aligning performative and ostensive aspects of organizational routines.

[1]  Tomi Männistö,et al.  Meeting scheduling across heterogeneous calendars and organizations utilizing mobile devices and cloud services , 2014, MUM.

[2]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  The Lure of the Virtual , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[3]  David R. Millen,et al.  Dogear: Social bookmarking in the enterprise , 2006, CHI.

[4]  Jan L. G. Dietz,et al.  Current trends in modeling inter-organizational cooperation , 2009, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[5]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  Everyday activities and energy consumption: how families understand the relationship , 2013, CHI.

[6]  Luciana D'Adderio The Performativity of Routines: Theorising the Influence of Artefacts and Distributed Agencies on Routines Dynamics , 2008 .

[7]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  From materials to materiality: connecting practice and theory in hc , 2012, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[8]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  The Nested Materiality of Environmental Monitoring , 2018, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Elvin Karana,et al.  Foundations of Materials Experience: An Approach for HCI , 2015, CHI.

[10]  Eva-Maria Kern,et al.  Framework for internet-supported inter-organizational product development collaboration , 2007, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[11]  Charlotte P. Lee,et al.  Recalibrating the ratio: enacting accountability in intimate relationships using shared calendars , 2013, CSCW '13.

[12]  Demosthenes Akoumianakis,et al.  Boundary spanning tactics and "traceable" connections in cross-organizational virtual alliances: A case study , 2014, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[13]  Olav W. Bertelsen,et al.  Emerging Materiality: Reflections on Creative Use of Software in Electronic Music Composition , 2009, Leonardo.

[14]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Materials, materiality, and media , 2013, CHI.

[15]  Satoshi Nakamura Calendar for everything: browse and search for personal archive on calendar , 2008, ICUIMC '08.

[16]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research , 2000, TCHI.

[17]  Tomas Sokoler,et al.  A material focus: exploring properties of computational composites , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[18]  Jared Donovan,et al.  Materialities influencing the design process , 2010, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[19]  Brad A. Myers,et al.  Availability bars for calendar scheduling , 2006, CHI EA '06.

[20]  Euripidis N. Loukis,et al.  Computer-supported G2G collaboration for public policy and decision-making , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[21]  Wanda Pratt,et al.  Shared Calendars for Home Health Management , 2015, CSCW.

[22]  Anke Dittmar,et al.  Personal ecologies of calendar artifacts , 2015, Journal of Interaction Science.

[23]  Lucy Suchman Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[24]  P. Dourish,et al.  Media as Material: Information Representations as Material Foundations for Organizational Practice , 2011 .

[25]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[26]  Sang-Won Lee,et al.  On social Web sites , 2010, Inf. Syst..

[27]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Calendars: Time Coordination and Overview in Families and Beyond , 2013, ECSCW.

[28]  Jatinder N. D. Gupta,et al.  An exploratory study of groupware use in the knowledge management process , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[29]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  The calendar is crucial: Coordination and awareness through the family calendar , 2009, TCHI.

[30]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[31]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Materiality matters---experience materials , 2013, INTR.

[32]  Tim Weitzel,et al.  Towards an IT production function: Understanding routines as fundamental for IT value creation , 2007, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[33]  B. Latour Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory , 2005 .

[34]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action , 2008, Inf. Organ..

[35]  Thomas A. Finholt,et al.  Artifacts that organize: Delegation in the distributed organization , 2013, Inf. Organ..

[36]  Hatem Bugshan,et al.  Open innovation using Web 2.0 technologies , 2015, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[37]  Daniel Buzzo,et al.  Not all Days are Equal: Investigating the Meaning in the Digital Calendar , 2015, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[38]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Social, individual and technological issues for groupware calendar systems , 1999, CHI '99.

[39]  Mikhil Masli,et al.  The design and usage of tentative events for time-based social coordination in the enterprise , 2011, WWW.

[40]  Xin Tan,et al.  User acceptance of SaaS-based collaboration tools: a case of Google Docs , 2015, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[41]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[42]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Technological Embeddedness and Organizational Change , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[43]  Joe Tullio,et al.  Augmenting shared personal calendars , 2002, UIST '02.

[44]  Terry Winograd A Language/Action Perspective on the Design of Cooperative Work , 1987, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[45]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Structures, forms, and stuff: the materiality and medium of interaction , 2013, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[46]  Stephen J. Payne,et al.  Understanding Calendar Use , 1993, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[47]  Victor Kaptelinin,et al.  Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design , 2006, First Monday.

[48]  Joëlle Coutaz,et al.  HCI and Software Engineering for User Interface Plasticity , 2012 .

[49]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  Casalendar: a temporal interface for automated homes , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[50]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Computing in Everyday Life: A Call for Research on Experiential Computing , 2010, MIS Q..

[51]  Michael Weber,et al.  PriCal: context-adaptive privacy in ambient calendar displays , 2014, UbiComp.

[52]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  The Ambivalent Ontology of Digital Artifacts , 2013, MIS Q..

[53]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies , 2011, MIS Q..