Recurrent Patterns of User Behavior in Different Electoral Campaigns: A Twitter Analysis of the Spanish General Elections of 2015 and 2016

We have retrieved and analyzed several millions of Twitter messages corresponding to the Spanish general elections held on the 20th of December 2015 and repeated on the 26th of June 2016. The availability of data from two electoral campaigns that are very close in time allows us to compare collective behaviors of two analogous social systems with a similar context. By computing and analyzing the time series of daily activity, we have found a significant linear correlation between both elections. Additionally, we have revealed that the daily number of tweets, retweets, and mentions follow a power law with respect to the number of unique users that take part in the conversation. Furthermore, we have verified that the topologies of the networks of mentions and retweets do not change from one election to the other, indicating that their underlying dynamics are robust in the face of a change in social context. Hence, in the light of our results, there are several recurrent collective behavioral patterns that exhibit similar and consistent properties in different electoral campaigns.

[1]  Manuel Cebrián,et al.  Social Media Fingerprints of Unemployment , 2014, PloS one.

[2]  Tiago P. Peixoto.  Hierarchical block structures and high-resolution model selection in large networks , 2013, ArXiv.

[3]  A. J. Morales,et al.  Characterizing and modeling an electoral campaign in the context of Twitter: 2011 Spanish Presidential Election as a case study , 2012, Chaos.

[4]  Sotiris Ioannidis,et al.  Investigating the complete corpus of referendum and elections tweets , 2016, 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM).

[5]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  A Multi-Level Geographical Study of Italian Political Elections from Twitter Data , 2014, PloS one.

[6]  Paul M. Torrens,et al.  Uncovering Social Media Reaction Pattern to Protest Events: A Spatiotemporal Dynamics Perspective of Ferguson Unrest , 2015, SocInfo.

[7]  L. Abroms,et al.  Obama's Wired Campaign: Lessons for Public Health Communication , 2009, Journal of health communication.

[8]  Carlo Ratti,et al.  Geo-located Twitter as proxy for global mobility patterns , 2013, Cartography and geographic information science.

[9]  John H. Parmelee.  Political journalists and Twitter: Influences on norms and practices , 2013 .

[10]  Andreas Jungherr,et al.  Tweets and votes, a special relationship: the 2009 federal election in germany , 2013, PLEAD '13.

[11]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Predicting the Future with Social Media , 2010, Web Intelligence.

[12]  A. J. Morales,et al.  Efficiency of human activity on information spreading on Twitter , 2014, Soc. Networks.

[13]  Vijayalakshmi Atluri,et al.  Analysis of political discourse on twitter in the context of the 2016 US presidential elections , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[14]  Anders Olof Larsson,et al.  Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign , 2012, New Media Soc..

[15]  M. Newman,et al.  Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[17]  Igor Mozetic,et al.  Cohesion and Coalition Formation in the European Parliament: Roll-Call Votes and Twitter Activities , 2016, PloS one.

[18]  J. C. Losada,et al.  Multiple leaders on a multilayer social media , 2015 .

[19]  Sergey Brin,et al.  The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[20]  Juan Carlos Losada,et al.  Semi-Automatic Training Set Construction for Supervised Sentiment Analysis in Political Contexts , 2018, 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM).

[21]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[22]  Aric Hagberg,et al.  Exploring Network Structure, Dynamics, and Function using NetworkX , 2008, Proceedings of the Python in Science Conference.

[23]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Graphs over time: densification laws, shrinking diameters and possible explanations , 2005, KDD '05.

[24]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Political Polarization on Twitter , 2011, ICWSM.

[25]  Yaneer Bar-Yam,et al.  Global patterns of synchronization in human communications , 2017, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[26]  Daniel Gayo-Avello,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of State-of-the-Art Electoral Prediction From Twitter Data , 2012, ArXiv.

[27]  A. J. Morales,et al.  Measuring Political Polarization: Twitter shows the two sides of Venezuela , 2015, Chaos.

[28]  Andreas Jungherr.  Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review , 2016 .

[29]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[30]  Yaneer Bar-Yam,et al.  An exploration of social identity: The geography and politics of news-sharing communities in twitter , 2012, Complex..

[31]  M. Newman,et al.  Mixing patterns in networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[32]  Jacob G Foster,et al.  Edge direction and the structure of networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Guillermo Cordero,et al.  The Breakdown of the Spanish Two-Party System: The Upsurge of Podemos and Ciudadanos in the 2015 General Election , 2016, Crisis Elections, New Contenders and Government Formation.