Use of Hand Biometric Information in Gender Identification

These days, mobile devices are expected to act as biometric readers due to their increasing number of sensors. However, few studies have suggested a method to identify the user’s demographic profile by collecting biometric information through smart devices, whereas demographic characteristics are an important factor that determines the overall preferences of the interface and content. Therefore, this paper suggests a method to identify the user’s gender based on the biometric information of users. Since the hand is one of the most frequently used body parts in touch interfaces, four hand dimensions and the EMG activities of four hand muscles were measured. The hand length, hand breadth, hand thickness, and hand circumference of 321 Koreans were collected as hand dimensions, and the EMG activities of 27 participants when using mock-ups of mobile phones were observed. As a result of discriminant analysis, hand dimensions could predict males and females with over 75% accuracy, while %MVC showed relatively lower accuracy. The results revealed that simple hand dimensions are a more efficient method to recognize the gender of users. In a further study, other biometric data could be utilized in sensing various types of demographic information considering that identification technologies are growing fast.

[1]  Tanuj Kanchan,et al.  Sex Determination from Hand Dimensions of North and South Indians , 2009, Journal of forensic sciences.

[2]  Gary M. Weiss,et al.  Cell phone-based biometric identification , 2010, 2010 Fourth IEEE International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS).

[3]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  Gender differences in satisfaction with Facebook users , 2015, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[4]  Benjamin J. Halpert Authentication interface evaluation and design for mobile devices , 2005, InfoSecCD '05.

[5]  Myung Hwan Yun,et al.  Determination of sex from various hand dimensions of Koreans. , 2015, Forensic science international.

[6]  David Passig,et al.  Gender preferences for multimedia interfaces , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[7]  Chun-Cheng Hsu Comparison of gender differences in young people's blog interface preferences and designs , 2012, Displays.

[8]  Mohd Azam Osman,et al.  A STUDY OF THE TREND OF SMARTPHONE ANDITS USAGE BEHAVIOR IN MALAYSIA , 2012 .

[9]  Wonjoon Kim,et al.  Effects of Grip Curvature and Size of Hand on Comfort for the Unimanual Operation of Handheld Touchscreen Device , 2014 .

[10]  Vandna Jowaheer,et al.  Sex identification on the basis of hand and foot measurements in Indo-Mauritian population--a model based approach. , 2011, Journal of forensic and legal medicine.

[11]  M Hagberg,et al.  Differences between work methods and gender in computer mouse use. , 2000, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[12]  Brian C. Lovell,et al.  Secure face recognition for mobile applications , 2014 .

[13]  M. Hagberg,et al.  Thumb postures and physical loads during mobile phone use - a comparison of young adults with and without musculoskeletal symptoms. , 2010, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[14]  Per E. Pedersen,et al.  Explaining intention to use mobile chat services: moderating effects of gender , 2005 .

[15]  Constantinos K. Coursaris,et al.  A Meta-Analytical Review of Empirical Mobile Usability Studies , 2011 .

[17]  Daniel Franklin,et al.  Estimation of sex from the metric assessment of digital hand radiographs in a Western Australian population. , 2014, Forensic science international.

[18]  Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang,et al.  Mobile user verification/identification using statistical mobility profile , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BIGCOMP).

[19]  J E Gold,et al.  Postures, typing strategies, and gender differences in mobile device usage: an observational study. , 2012, Applied ergonomics.

[20]  D. Passig,et al.  Gender Interest Differences with Multimedia Learning Interfaces , 1999, IASL Annual Conference Proceedings.

[21]  Hugo Liu,et al.  Of Men, Women, and Computers: Data-driven Gender Modeling for Improved User Interfaces , 2022 .

[22]  Gerald Knezek,et al.  Gender as a predictive factor for tasks completed using smartphones , 2013 .

[23]  Shintaro Okazaki,et al.  Exploring convenience in mobile commerce: Moderating effects of gender , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[24]  Richard P. Wells,et al.  Biomechanical Loading on the Hand, Wrist, and Forearm When Holding a Tablet Computer , 2015 .

[25]  Brian C. Lovell,et al.  Face Recognition on Consumer Devices: Reflections on Replay Attacks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[26]  Hye-Jin Lee,et al.  Facets of simplicity for the smartphone interface: A structural model , 2012, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[27]  Maha A. Hilal,et al.  Determination of sex from hand dimensions and index/ring finger length ratio in Upper Egyptians , 2011 .

[28]  C. Nicolay,et al.  Grip strength and endurance: Influences of anthropometric variation, hand dominance, and gender , 2005 .