Some evidence for correlated separate activation in a simple letter-detection task

This study investigates the separate activation versus coactivation issue for redundant targets in a simple letter-detection paradigm with latency as the dependent variable. The results of a one-response visual-search task are reported. Since, on single-target trials, only the target was presented and no accompanying noise element, no “distraction decrement” caused by irrelevant noise elements (Grice et al., 1984) was to be expected. The data obtained showed a clear redundantsignal effect. Subsequent detailed analysis of the latency data using Miller’s (1982) procedure indicated that the results were consistent with a separate activation model and failed to provide convincing evidence in favor of coactivation models. A further analysis of the data indicated that, in the present study, the separate channels were negatively correlated for a range of fast RTs and positively correlated for intermediate and larger RTs. No evidence in favor of Grice et al.’s (1984) distraction-decrement hypothesis was found. The conclusions of this study are that (1) a separate activation model summarizes the essential features of information processing in this simple visual search task, and (2) no convincing evidence in favor of coactivation in visual search tasks has been reported in the literature up to now.

[1]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[2]  A. H. C. van der Heijden,et al.  The array-size function in simple visual search tasks: A comparison between a “go- no go” and a “detection” task under conditions of low target-noise similarity , 1983 .

[3]  I. Biederman,et al.  Processing redundant information , 1970 .

[4]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Selective attention: Noise suppression or signal enhancement? , 1974 .

[6]  Raymond S. Nickerson,et al.  Binary-classification reaction time: A review of some studies of human information-processing capabilities. , 1972 .

[7]  A. H. C. Heijden,et al.  Parallel processing of redundant targets in simple visual search tasks , 1983, Psychological research.

[8]  G R Grice,et al.  Combination rule for redundant information in reaction time tasks with divided attention , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  A. H. C. van der Heijden,et al.  The array size function in simple visual search tasks: A comparison between “go-no go” and “yes-no” tasks under conditions of high and low target-noise similarity , 1982 .

[10]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Response competition effects insame-different judgments , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  J. Miller,et al.  Multidimensional same--different judgments: evidence against independent comparisons of dimensions. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Independence of successive inputs and uncorrelated error in visual form perception. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Independence in the perception of simultaneously presented forms at brief durations. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  Charles W. Eriksen,et al.  Internal perceptual system noise and redundancy in simultaneous inputs in form identification , 1965 .

[17]  E. G. J. Eijkman,et al.  Distributions of simple RT with single and double stimuli , 1977 .

[18]  Jeff Miller.  Global precedence in attention and decision. , 1981 .

[19]  R. Ratcliff.  Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  Charles W. Eriksen,et al.  The perception of multiple simultaneously presented forms as a function of foveal spacing , 1967 .