Renewable energy policies in promoting financing and investment among the East Asia Summit countries: Quantitative assessment and policy implications

Many countries have implemented various policies for renewable energy development ranging from setting power purchase agreements and the legislation of renewable energy requirements to providing incentives and imposing carbon taxes. The evaluation of the effectiveness of such policies, however, is fragmented, which raises a need for a comprehensive analysis. This paper aims to assess whether and how policies promoting renewable energy investment have achieved the intended goals. It employs five broadly defined criteria - market, uncertainty, profitability, technology, and financial resources - to build an index to assess respectively if such policies have helped create a market for renewable energy, maximize potential profits, reduce risks relating to the investment, develop and adopt new technologies, and improve the access to financial resources. Each criterion is reflected by three indicators. Values of each indicator are converted into ordinal values for analysis. The index not only scans comprehensively all relevant renewable energy investment policies in the East Asia Summit countries, but also provides systematic and quantitative measures to compare the effectiveness of policies in these countries with respect to the creation of market, the degree of uncertainty, the potential of profitability, the development and adoption of technology and the accessibility of financial resources.

[1]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Which renewable energy policy is a venture capitalist's best friend? Empirical evidence from a survey of international cleantech investors , 2009 .

[2]  Jianfei Shen,et al.  Overall review of renewable energy subsidy policies in China – Contradictions of intentions and effects , 2015 .

[3]  H. Dulal,et al.  Renewable energy diffusion in Asia: Can it happen without government support? , 2013 .

[4]  Neil Gunningham,et al.  Managing the energy trilemma: The case of Indonesia☆ , 2013 .

[5]  Paul A. Gompers,et al.  An analysis of compensation in the U.S. venture capital partnership 1 Helpful comments were provided , 1999 .

[6]  Deepak Sharma,et al.  Vietnam's energy sector: A review of current energy policies and strategies , 2011 .

[7]  S. Tongsopit,et al.  An assessment of Thailand's feed-in tariff program , 2013 .

[8]  David Lindley,et al.  Smart grids: The energy storage problem , 2010, Nature.

[9]  Merrill Jones Barradale Impact of public policy uncertainty on renewable energy investment: Wind power and the production tax credit , 2010 .

[10]  Geoff Kelly,et al.  History and potential of renewable energy development in New Zealand , 2011 .

[11]  Freyr Sverrisson,et al.  Renewables 2014 : global status report , 2014 .

[12]  I. G. Mason,et al.  A 100% renewable electricity generation system for New Zealand utilising hydro, wind, geothermal and biomass resources , 2010 .

[13]  Weerakorn Ongsakul,et al.  ASEAN towards clean and sustainable energy: potentials, utilization and barriers. , 2007 .

[14]  Gisèle Schmid,et al.  The development of renewable energy power in India: Which policies have been effective? , 2011 .

[15]  Kamaruzzaman Sopian,et al.  Potentials and challenges in implementing feed-in tariff policy in Indonesia and the Philippines , 2013 .

[16]  Somchai Wongwises,et al.  Critical review of the current status of wind energy in Thailand , 2014 .

[17]  Y. Gagnon,et al.  An analysis of feed-in tariff remuneration models: Implications for renewable energy investment , 2010 .

[18]  T. Mahlia,et al.  A review on energy scenario and sustainable energy in Indonesia , 2011 .

[19]  C Maid Santosh,et al.  Electrical Grid Modernization: State of theArt and Future Trends , 2013 .

[20]  Nasrudin Abd Rahim,et al.  Renewable energy policies for sustainable development in Cambodia , 2013 .

[21]  Wei-Ming Chen,et al.  Renewable energy in eastern Asia: Renewable energy policy review and comparative SWOT analysis for promoting renewable energy in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan , 2014 .

[22]  Karl Mallon Book Review: Renewable Energy Policy and Politics — A Handbook for Decision-Making , 2006 .

[23]  Minh Ha-Duong,et al.  ECONOMIC Potential of Renewable Energy in Vietnam's Power Sector , 2009 .

[24]  K. Youcef-Toumi,et al.  Real-time economic dispatch for the supply side of the energy-water nexus , 2014 .

[25]  Mattijs Smits,et al.  A light left in the dark: The practice and politics of pico-hydropower in the Lao PDR , 2010 .

[26]  Huang Liming,et al.  Financing rural renewable energy: A comparison between China and India , 2009 .

[27]  Z. Salam,et al.  Malaysia's renewable energy policies and programs with green aspects , 2014 .

[28]  M. Ragwitz,et al.  Status and perspectives of renewable energy policy and deployment in the European Union—What is needed to reach the 2020 targets? , 2011 .

[29]  Nguyen Minh Bao,et al.  Energy supply, demand, and policy in Viet Nam, with future projections , 2011 .

[30]  Atul K. Raturi,et al.  Renewables 2016 Global status report , 2015 .

[31]  Feng Wang,et al.  China's Renewable Energy Policy: Commitments and Challenges , 2010 .

[32]  Kornelis Blok,et al.  Renewable energy policies in the European Union , 2006 .