Trends of blood pressure levels and management in Västerbotten County, Sweden, during 1990–2010

Background: Availability of longitudinal data on hypertension and blood pressure levels are important to assess changes over time at the population level. Moreover, detailed information in different population sub-groups is important to understand inequity and social determinants of blood pressure distribution in the population. Objectives: The objectives of this study are to: (1) describe the trends of population blood pressure levels in men and women between different educational levels and geographic areas in Sweden during 1990–2010; (2) identify prevalences of hypertension, awareness, treatment, and control in the population; and (3) assess the 10-year risk of developing hypertension among individuals with normal and high normal blood pressures. Methods: This study is based on data from the Västerbotten Intervention Program (VIP) in Västerbotten County, Sweden. The cross-sectional analysis includes 133,082 VIP health examinations among individuals aged 30, 40, 50, and 60 years from 1990 to 2010. The panel analysis includes 34,868 individuals who were re-examined 10 years after the baseline examination. Individuals completed a self-administered health questionnaire that covers demographic and socio-economic information, self-reported health, and lifestyle behaviours. Blood pressure measurement was obtained prior to the questionnaire. In the cross-sectional analysis, trends of blood pressure by sex, and between educational groups and geographic areas are presented. In the panel analysis, the 10-year risk of developing hypertension is estimated using the predicted probability from logistic regression analysis for each sex, controlling for age and educational level. Results: The prevalence of hypertension decreased from 1990 to 2010; from 43.8 to 36.0% (p < 0.001) among men, and 37.6 to 27.5% among women (p < 0.001). Individuals with basic education had a significantly higher prevalence of hypertension compared to those with medium or high education. Although the decreases were observed in all geographic areas, individuals in rural inland areas had a much higher prevalence compared to those who lived in Umeå City. The proportion of hypertensive women who were aware of their hypertension (61.7%) was significantly higher than men (51.6%). About 34% of men and 42% of women with hypertension reported taking blood pressure medication. Over time, awareness and control of hypertension improved (from 46.5% in 1990 to 69% in 2010 and from 30 to 65%, respectively). The gaps between educational groups diminished. This study shows a significantly higher risk of developing hypertension for men and women with high normal blood pressure compared to those with normal blood pressure at baseline in all age cohorts and educational groups. The average risks of developing hypertension among men with high normal blood pressure were 21.5, 45.8, and 56.3% in the 30, 40, and 50-year cohorts, respectively. Corresponding numbers for women were 22.6, 47.4, and 57.9%. Conclusions: Levels of blood pressure and hypertension decreased significantly among the Västerbotten population in the last 21 years. Hypertension management has improved and there is increased awareness, treatment, and control of blood pressure. Despite these achievements, the persisting social gaps in blood pressure levels and management demand further investigation and action from policy makers. Future research should attempt to identify and address the root causes of these health inequities to ensure better and equal health for the whole population.

[1]  Rajeev Gupta,et al.  Twenty-year trends in cardiovascular risk factors in India and influence of educational status , 2012, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[2]  M. Prince,et al.  Hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment and control among older people in Latin America, India and China: a 10/66 cross-sectional population-based survey , 2012, Journal of hypertension.

[3]  N. Ng,et al.  Increasing physical activity, but persisting social gaps among middle-aged people: trends in Northern Sweden from 1990 to 2007 , 2011, Global health action.

[4]  M. Nilsson,et al.  Changing patterns of tobacco use in a middle-aged population – the role of snus, gender, age, and education , 2011, Global health action.

[5]  Martin McKee,et al.  Priority actions for the non-communicable disease crisis , 2011, The Lancet.

[6]  S. Friel,et al.  Action on the social determinants of health and health inequities goes global. , 2011, Annual review of public health.

[7]  M. Abrahamowicz,et al.  Associations of education with 30 year life course blood pressure trajectories: Framingham Offspring Study , 2011, BMC public health.

[8]  S. Söderberg,et al.  Large improvements in major cardiovascular risk factors in the population of northern Sweden: the MONICA study 1986–2009 , 2011, Journal of internal medicine.

[9]  G. Jensen,et al.  Trends and determinant factors for population blood pressure with 25 years of follow-up: results from the Copenhagen City Heart Study , 2010, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[10]  H. Stenlund,et al.  The obesity epidemic slows among the middle-aged population in Sweden while the socioeconomic gap widens , 2010, Global health action.

[11]  H. Stenlund,et al.  Increasing glucose concentrations and prevalence of diabetes mellitus in northern Sweden, 1990–2007 , 2010, Global health action.

[12]  P. Nilsson,et al.  Hypertension in the Elderly: What Is the Goal Blood Pressure Target and How Can This Be Attained? , 2010, Current hypertension reports.

[13]  J. Tuomilehto,et al.  Despite evidence-based guidelines, systolic blood pressure remains inadequately controlled in older hypertensive adults , 2010, Journal of Human Hypertension.

[14]  B. Egan,et al.  US trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, 1988-2008. , 2010, JAMA.

[15]  Veikko Salomaa,et al.  Thirty-five-year trends in cardiovascular risk factors in Finland. , 2010, International journal of epidemiology.

[16]  L. Weinehall,et al.  The Västerbotten Intervention Programme: background, design and implications , 2010, Global health action.

[17]  G. Mancia,et al.  Management of antihypertensive drugs in three European countries , 2009, Journal of hypertension.

[18]  W. Elliott Improving Outcomes in Hypertensive Patients: Focus on Adherence and Persistence With Antihypertensive Therapy , 2009, Journal of clinical hypertension.

[19]  N. Lunet,et al.  Differences in prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension between developing and developed countries , 2009, Journal of hypertension.

[20]  J. Murabito,et al.  American Journal of Epidemiology Original Contribution Life-course Socioeconomic Position and Incidence of Coronary Heart Disease the Framingham Offspring Study , 2022 .

[21]  J. Mindell,et al.  Continued Improvement in Hypertension Management in England: Results From the Health Survey for England 2006 , 2009, Hypertension.

[22]  B. Stegmayr,et al.  Favorable Trends in the Incidence and Outcome in Stroke in Nondiabetic and Diabetic Subjects: Findings From the Northern Sweden MONICA Stroke Registry in 1985 to 2003 , 2008, Stroke.

[23]  M. Wofford,et al.  Does socioeconomic status affect blood pressure goal achievement? , 2008, Current hypertension reports.

[24]  J. Jansson,et al.  Gender differences in trends of acute myocardial infarction events: The Northern Sweden MONICA study 1985 – 2004 , 2008, BMC cardiovascular disorders.

[25]  Y. Sharabi,et al.  Hypertension and socioeconomic status , 2008, Current opinion in cardiology.

[26]  L. Wilhelmsen,et al.  Secular changes in cardiovascular risk factors and attack rate of myocardial infarction among men aged 50 in Gothenburg, Sweden. Accurate prediction using risk models , 2008, Journal of internal medicine.

[27]  R. Gillum,et al.  High blood pressure and cardiovascular disease mortality risk among U.S. adults: the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey mortality follow-up study. , 2008, Annals of epidemiology.

[28]  G. Mensah,et al.  Socioeconomic status and trends in disparities in 4 major risk factors for cardiovascular disease among US adults, 1971-2002. , 2006, Archives of internal medicine.

[29]  J. Vega,et al.  The Commission on Social Determinants of Health: Tackling the Social Roots of Health Inequities , 2006, PLoS medicine.

[30]  J. Tuomilehto,et al.  Trends in the prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension: the WHO MONICA Project , 2006, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[31]  B. Hedblad,et al.  High blood pressure despite treatment: Results from a cross-sectional primary healthcare-based study in southern Sweden , 2006, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[32]  A. Divani,et al.  Prehypertension as a Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Diseases , 2006, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.

[33]  J. Critchley,et al.  Modelling the decline in coronary heart disease deaths in England and Wales, 1981-2000: comparing contributions from primary prevention and secondary prevention , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[34]  L. Råstam,et al.  Low adherence with antihypertensives in actual practice: the association with social participation – a multilevel analysis , 2005, BMC public health.

[35]  K. Reynolds,et al.  Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data , 2005, The Lancet.

[36]  A. Mainous,et al.  Prehypertension and mortality in a nationally representative cohort. , 2004, The American journal of cardiology.

[37]  J. Jansson,et al.  Trends in blood pressure, lipids, lipoproteins and glucose metabolism in the Northern Sweden MONICA project 1986 - 99 , 2003, Scandinavian journal of public health. Supplement.

[38]  Ihab Hajjar,et al.  Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the United States, 1988-2000. , 2003, JAMA.

[39]  Daniel W. Jones,et al.  The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. , 2003, JAMA.

[40]  L. Weinehall,et al.  High remaining risk in poorly treated hypertension: the ‘rule of halves’ still exists , 2002, Journal of hypertension.

[41]  Bruce Neal,et al.  1999 World Health Organization-International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension. Guidelines Subcommittee. , 1999, Journal of hypertension.

[42]  Guidelines Sub-Committee,et al.  1999 World Health Organization--International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension. Guidelines Sub-Committee. , 1999, Blood pressure. Supplement.

[43]  Detection The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC VI) , 1997 .

[44]  G Rose,et al.  Sick individuals and sick populations. , 1985, International journal of epidemiology.