An integrated method of rough set, Kano's model and AHP for rating customer requirements' final importance

Owing to the typical vagueness or imprecision of customer requirements (CRs) in product planning house of quality (PPHOQ), determining the final importance of CRs is very difficult. Combining rough set theory, Kano's model, analytical hierarchy process (AHP), and scale method, an integrated method is proposed to obtain the final importance of CRs in PPHOQ. Firstly, by using relative reduction and relative core in rough set theory, a decision system is built to acquire CRs in PPHOQ. Secondly, based on relative positive field in rough set, the decision system is simplified and its corresponding new decision system is established to determine the fundamental importance ratings of CRs. Thirdly, by integrating scale method into AHP approach, calculating formulas of the importance rating of achieving the improvement ratio of satisfaction estimation of a CR are developed. Next, for every CR, based on a combination of its fundamental importance rating, the importance rating of achieving the improvement ratio of its satisfaction estimation, and ''its sales point'', its final importance rating is determined. Finally, a case study is provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the presented method.

[1]  Jiafu Tang,et al.  An optimization method for components selection using quality function deployment , 2008 .

[2]  K. Tan,et al.  Integrating Kano's model in the planning matrix of quality function deployment , 2000 .

[3]  Juite Wang,et al.  Fuzzy outranking approach to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment , 1999 .

[4]  Min Xie,et al.  Prioritizing quality characteristics in dynamic quality function deployment , 2006 .

[5]  N. Kano,et al.  Attractive Quality and Must-Be Quality , 1984 .

[6]  Richard Y. K. Fung,et al.  A new approach to quality function deployment planning with financial consideration , 2002, Comput. Oper. Res..

[7]  C. K. Kwong,et al.  Inexact genetic algorithm approach to target values setting of engineering requirements in QFD , 2003 .

[8]  Susan Carlson Skalak House of Quality , 2002 .

[9]  William Ho,et al.  Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - A literature review , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Rudiments of rough sets , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[11]  C K Kwong,et al.  Determining the Importance Weights for the Customer Requirements in QFD Using a Fuzzy AHP with an Extent Analysis Approach , 2003 .

[12]  R. Y. K. Fung,et al.  Fuzzy expected value modelling approach for determining target values of engineering characteristics in QFD , 2005 .

[13]  Ying Dong,et al.  Synthesis, Evaluation, and Selection of Parts Design Scheme in Supplier Involved Product Development , 2005, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[14]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  M. Lu,et al.  Integrating QFD, AHP and Benchmarking in Strategic Marketing , 1994 .

[16]  Hsing-Pei Kao,et al.  Rating the importance of customer needs in quality function deployment by fuzzy and entropy methods , 1999 .

[17]  Deok-Hwan Kim,et al.  Robust QFD: framework and a case study , 2007, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[18]  Richard Y. K. Fung,et al.  Modelling of quality function deployment planning with resource allocation , 2003 .

[19]  Richard Y. K. Fung,et al.  Fuzzy regression-based mathematical programming model for quality function deployment , 2004 .

[20]  Gary S. Wasserman,et al.  ON HOW TO PRIORITIZE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS DURING THE QFD PLANNING PROCESS , 1993 .

[21]  Shing I. Chang,et al.  An integrated group decision-making approach to quality function deployment , 1999 .

[22]  Michael A. Mullens,et al.  AN AHP FRAMEWORK FOR PRIORITIZING CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS IN QFD: AN INDUSTRIALIZED HOUSING APPLICATION , 1994 .

[23]  Ming-Lu Wu,et al.  Quality function deployment: A literature review , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Thong Ngee Goh,et al.  Advanced Qfd Applications , 2003 .

[25]  Richard Y. K. Fung,et al.  Estimating the functional relationships for quality function deployment under uncertainties , 2006, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[26]  E. Ertugrul Karsak,et al.  Fuzzy multiple objective decision making approach to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment , 2004 .

[27]  Ming-Lu Wu,et al.  A systematic approach to quality function deployment with a full illustrative example , 2005 .

[28]  Jiafu Tang,et al.  Rating technical attributes in fuzzy QFD by integrating fuzzy weighted average method and fuzzy expected value operator , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  Kwang-Jae Kim,et al.  Determination of an Optimal Set of Design Requirements Using House of Quality , 1998 .

[30]  Richard Y. K. Fung,et al.  Product design resources optimization using a non-linear fuzzy quality function deployment model , 2002 .

[31]  Gerald W. Evans,et al.  Fuzzy multicriteria models for quality function deployment , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[32]  Kay Chuan Tan,et al.  INCORPORATING CONCEPTS OF BUSINESS PRIORITY INTO QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT , 2004 .