Video Game Monetization (e.g., ‘Loot Boxes’): a Blueprint for Practical Social Responsibility Measures

Video games are becoming increasingly monetized with the addition of in-game purchasing options, which has prompted some comparisons of these products to electronic gaming machines. The expansion and sophistication of ‘microtransaction’ options in online games (e.g., ‘loot boxes’) has also led to concerns about vulnerable users (e.g., adolescents) overspending on these schemes. Currently, there are limited regulatory and/or consumer protection frameworks for video game monetization schemes. This conceptual paper explores some potential social responsibility measures for monetized gaming products to stimulate further discussion and developments in this area. Loot boxes are a focus of this discussion given the current debate on their legality, i.e., similarity to electronic gambling machines. Drawing on social responsibility principles and research in the field of gambling studies, we outline some potential measures in the areas of: (1) game design and in-game purchasing system characteristics, (2) transparency and accuracy of game design and features, (3) broad consumer protection measures, and (4) consumer information and industry accountability. It is hoped that this paper will encourage further discussion among academics, regulators, and the industry. An empirical evidence base is needed to inform the design and implementation of countermeasures for monetization schemes that increase risk of gaming-related harm for some users.

[1]  Alex Blaszczynski,et al.  A Science-Based Framework for Responsible Gambling: The Reno Model , 2004, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[2]  M. Griffiths Minimizing harm from gambling: what is the gambling industry's role? , 2009, Addiction.

[3]  A. Blaszczynski,et al.  Gambling Motivations, Money-Limiting Strategies, and Precommitment Preferences of Problem Versus Non-Problem Gamblers , 2010, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[4]  A. Blaszczynski,et al.  Informed Choice and Gambling: Principles for Consumer Protection , 2013 .

[5]  Daniel L. King,et al.  A review of Australian classification practices for commercial video games featuring simulated gambling , 2012 .

[6]  Avi Parush,et al.  Embedded Disruption: Facilitating Responsible Gambling with Persuasive Systems Design , 2014, PERSUASIVE.

[7]  G. Meyer,et al.  Internet Self-Exclusion: Characteristics of Self-Excluded Gamblers and Preliminary Evidence for Its Effectiveness , 2011, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction.

[8]  Sally M. Gainsbury,et al.  Migration from social casino games to gambling: Motivations and characteristics of gamers who gamble , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  MICHAEL SMEATON,et al.  Internet Gambling and Social Responsibility: An Exploratory Study , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[10]  N. Hing,et al.  Servicescape features and preferred gambling venue , 2012 .

[11]  Alex Blaszczynski,et al.  Responsible Gambling: General Principles and Minimal Requirements , 2011, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[12]  Joseph Macey,et al.  eSports, skins and loot boxes: Participants, practices and problematic behaviour associated with emergent forms of gambling , 2018, New Media Soc..

[13]  Ema Tanaka,et al.  Game of chance elements in free-to-play mobile games. A freemium business model monetization tool in need of self-regulation? , 2017 .

[14]  Joseph Macey,et al.  Investigating relationships between video gaming, spectating esports, and gambling , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Sally Melissa Gainsbury Internet Gambling: Current Research Findings and Implications , 2012 .

[16]  Daniel L. King,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Interrelationships Between Social Casino Gaming, Gambling, and Problem Gambling , 2015, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction.

[17]  Thorsten Teichert,et al.  Positioning of online gambling and gaming products from a consumer perspective: A blurring of perceived boundaries , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  John C. Norcross,et al.  In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. , 1992 .

[19]  James D. Sauer,et al.  Video game loot boxes are psychologically akin to gambling , 2018, Nature Human Behaviour.

[20]  M. Griffiths,et al.  Behavioral Tracking Tools, Regulation, and Corporate Social Responsibility in Online Gambling , 2013 .

[21]  Michael J. A. Wohl,et al.  An Examination of the Relationship Between Social Casino Gaming and Gambling: The Bad, The Ugly, and The Good , 2017 .

[22]  N. Hing The Efficacy of Responsible Gambling Measures in NSW Clubs: The Gamblers' Perspective , 2004 .

[23]  Daniel L. King Comment on the global gaming industry's statement on ICD-11 gaming disorder: a corporate strategy to disregard harm and deflect social responsibility? , 2018, Addiction.

[24]  Daniel L. King,et al.  The cost of virtual wins: An examination of gambling-related risks in youth who spend money on social casino games , 2016, Journal of behavioral addictions.

[25]  D. GriffithsMark,et al.  IS THE BUYING OF LOOT BOXES IN VIDEO GAMES A FORM OF GAMBLING OR GAMING , 2018 .

[26]  Gert-Jan Meerkerk,et al.  Video game addiction and social responsibility , 2010 .

[27]  Isabelle Giroux,et al.  Gambling content in Facebook games: A common phenomenon? , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  J. Tremblay,et al.  Transition from playing with simulated gambling games to gambling with real money: a longitudinal study in adolescence , 2017 .

[29]  Sebastian Schwiddessen,et al.  Watch your loot boxes! – Recent developments and legal assessment in selected key jurisdictions from a gambling law perspective , 2018, Interactive Entertainment Law Review.

[30]  Janne Paavilainen,et al.  Creating play money for free-to-play and gambling games , 2016, MindTrek.

[31]  Serge Sévigny,et al.  Responsible Gambling Tools: Pop-Up Messages and Pauses on Video Lottery Terminals , 2006, The Journal of psychology.

[32]  J. Derevensky,et al.  Social casino gaming and adolescents: Should we be concerned and is regulation in sight? , 2016, International journal of law and psychiatry.

[33]  Jim Orford,et al.  Disabling the public interest: gambling strategies and policies for Britain. , 2005, Addiction.

[34]  Daniel L. King,et al.  Predatory monetization schemes in video games (e.g. 'loot boxes') and internet gaming disorder. , 2018, Addiction.

[35]  M. Beutel,et al.  Free-to-play: About addicted Whales, at risk Dolphins and healthy Minnows. Monetarization design and Internet Gaming Disorder. , 2017, Addictive behaviors.

[36]  Serge Sévigny,et al.  Electronic gambling machine gamblers’ characteristics vary according to the type of gambling venue: a Canadian study , 2016 .

[37]  Daniel L. King,et al.  Gambling in Australia: experiences, problems, research and policy. , 2012, Addiction.

[38]  Daniel L. King,et al.  Distinguishing between gaming and gambling activities in addiction research , 2015, Journal of behavioral addictions.

[39]  Zheng Gu,et al.  Industry labor force quality: an investigation from the customer service perspective. , 2008 .

[40]  Debi A. LaPlante,et al.  Real Limits in the Virtual World: Self-Limiting Behavior of Internet Gamblers , 2008, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[41]  G. Meyer,et al.  Do Simulated Gambling Activities Predict Gambling with Real Money During Adolescence? Empirical Findings from a Longitudinal Study , 2018, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[42]  Sally M. Gainsbury,et al.  Who Pays to Play Freemium Games? The Profiles and Motivations of Players Who Make Purchases Within Social Casino Games , 2016, Journal of behavioral addictions.

[43]  D. Hodgins,et al.  Pilot study of an Internet-based personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers , 2011 .

[44]  N. Hing Changing the Odds: A Study of Corporate Social Principles and Practices in Addressing Problem Gambling , 2001 .

[45]  H. Shaffer,et al.  How Do Gamblers End Gambling: Longitudinal Analysis of Internet Gambling Behaviors Prior to Account Closure Due to Gambling Related Problems , 2009, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[46]  A. Pym,et al.  Terms of use : Click here GENDER-BASED ATTITUDES , HIV MISCONCEPTIONS AND FEELINGS TOWARDS MARGINALIZED GROUPS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH STIGMATIZATION IN MUMBAI , INDIA , 2014 .

[47]  J. Prochaska,et al.  In Search of How People Change: Applications to Addictive Behaviors , 1992, The American psychologist.

[48]  Yipeng Liu,et al.  Design of Free-to-Play Mobile Games for the Competitive Marketplace , 2018, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[49]  Mark D. Griffiths,et al.  Social Responsibility Tools in Online Gambling: A Survey of Attitudes and Behavior among Internet Gamblers , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[50]  R. Cialdini Influence: Science and Practice , 1984 .

[51]  Sally Monaghan,et al.  Responsible gambling strategies for Internet gambling: The theoretical and empirical base of using pop-up messages to encourage self-awareness , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[52]  A. Blaszczynski,et al.  Responsible gambling: a synthesis of the empirical evidence , 2017 .

[53]  Mark D. Griffiths,et al.  Voluntary Limit Setting and Player Choice in Most Intense Online Gamblers: An Empirical Study of Gambling Behaviour , 2013, Journal of Gambling Studies.