Management accounting systems, task uncertainty and managerial performance: A research note

Abstract This study examines the interactive effects of management accounting systems (MAS) design and task uncertainty on managerial performance. MAS design was defined in terms of the extent to which managers use broad scope MAS information. The responses of 42 managers, drawn from a cross-section of Australian manufacturing companies, to a questionnaire survey were analysed by using a multiple regression technique. The results showed that under a high task uncertainty situation, the extent of use of broad scope MAS information led to effective managerial decisions and hence to improved managerial performance. On the other hand, under low task uncertainty situations, the extent of use of broad scope MAS information led to information overload which was dysfunctional to managerial performance.

[1]  C. Perrow.  Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View , 1970 .

[2]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  The Concept of Fit in Contingency Theory. , 1984 .

[3]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design. , 1978 .

[4]  I. Eggleton,et al.  The impact of reliance on accounting performance measures on job-related tension and managerial performance: Additional evidence , 1995 .

[5]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Organization Design , 1977 .

[6]  Lokman Mia,et al.  The usefulness of management accounting systems, functional differentiation and managerial effectiveness , 1994 .

[7]  P. A. Losty,et al.  A Behavioural Theory of the Firm , 1965 .

[8]  R. Duncan.  Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. , 1972 .

[9]  George C. Thornton,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUPERVISORY- AND SELF-APPRAISALS OF EXECUTIVE PERFORMANCE , 1968 .

[10]  Ronald W. Hilton.  Integrating Normative and Descriptive Theories of Information Processing , 1980 .

[11]  E. Prien,et al.  ASSESSMENTS OF HIGHER-LEVEL PERSONNEL: III. RATING CRITERIA: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SUPERVISOR RATINGS AND INCUMBENT SELF-RATINGS OF JOB PERFORMANCE , 1962 .

[12]  John W. Slocum,et al.  Technology, Structure, and Workgroup Effectiveness: A Test of a Contingency Model , 1984 .

[13]  C. Perrow.  A FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONS , 1967 .

[14]  C. B. Schoonhoven.  Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency "theory.". , 1981, Administrative science quarterly.

[15]  Lawrence A. Gordon,et al.  Management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and organization structure: An empirical investigation , 1984 .

[16]  A. Hopwood,et al.  Accounting and human behaviour , 1976 .

[17]  William G. Egelhoff.  Strategy and Structure in Multinational Corporations: An Information- Processing Approach , 1982 .

[18]  A. N. Oppenheim.  Questionnaire Design and Attitude Measurement , 1966 .

[19]  Alan S. Dunk,et al.  TASK UNCERTAINTY AND ITS INTERACTION WITH BUDGETARY PARTICIPATION AND BUDGET EMPHASIS: SOME... , 1991 .

[20]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  A Task Contingent Model of Work-Unit Structure. , 1974 .

[21]  D. Pugh,et al.  The Context of Organization Structures , 1969 .

[22]  John W. Payne,et al.  Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis☆ , 1976 .

[23]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Measures of Perrow's Work Unit Technology: An Empirical Assessment and a New Scale , 1983 .

[24]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[25]  F. Gul,et al.  The effects of management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and decentralization on managerial performance: A test of three-way interaction , 1994 .

[26]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[27]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[28]  Ferdinand A. Gul,et al.  The Effects of Management Accounting Systems and Environmental Uncertainty on Small Business Managers' Performance , 1991 .