Legal Limits Relaxed: Time to Look at Other Barriers Faced by Women Seeking Termination of Pregnancy for Fetal Anomalies

Introduction Advancements in prenatal diagnostic techniques have led to an increase in demand for termination of pregnancy for fetal anomalies (TOPFA). While relaxation in the legal gestational age limits across various countries relieves an important barrier, there is a need to identify the reasons that lead to delays in seeking abortion for fetal anomalies, because abortion-related complications increase with gestational age. Methods In this hospital-based qualitative study, antenatal women referred to a tertiary care institute in North India because of major fetal anomalies were explained about the study. Those women who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were recruited after taking consent. Details of antenatal care and prenatal tests were recorded. An in-depth inquiry was made into the reasons for the delay in prenatal tests, the delay in the decision for abortion, and specific problems that they faced in seeking TOPFA. Results Out of 80 women who met the inclusion criteria and consented to participate, more than 75% had received antenatal care in public healthcare facilities. Less than 50% of women received folic acid in the first trimester while 26% had first contact with healthcare facilities in the second trimester. Only 21 women underwent screening for common aneuploidies. Second-trimester anomaly scan was delayed in 35 women due to women-centered reasons (n = 17) or provider-centered (n = 19) reasons. Only 37.5% of women were counseled about fetal anomalies by their primary care provider. Owing to delay at multiple levels, 40 women (50%) could receive counseling about fetal abnormality for the first time after 20 weeks. These women could not be offered abortion because this study was carried out before the amendments in the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act in India. The older act allowed abortion up to 20 weeks of gestation. Seventeen women could obtain permission for an abortion from a court of law. Arrangements for travel and stay and dependence on family members were the main problems faced by women seeking TOPFA. Conclusions Delay in diagnosis of a fetal anomaly due to delay in seeking antenatal care, irregular follow-up, and lack of pre-test counseling are the major reasons for the delay in the decision for abortion. This is further compounded by inadequate post-test counseling. Lack of awareness, failure or delay in counseling, need to travel to another facility for abortion, dependence on family members, and financial issues are the major barriers.

[1]  M. Tomlinson,et al.  Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: a systematic review of the healthcare experiences and needs of parents , 2021, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[2]  J. Kishore,et al.  Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment Bill, 2021): Is it Enough for Indian Women Regarding Comprehensive Abortion Care?? , 2021, Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine.

[3]  A. Vasudeva,et al.  We Need to Improve Prenatal Screening Practices in Primary Obstetric Care: A Representative Data from a Fetal Medicine Unit in Coastal Karnataka , 2021, The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India.

[4]  S. Saleem Modified Kuppuswamy socioeconomic scale updated for the year 2019 , 2019, Indian Journal of Forensic and Community Medicine.

[5]  E. Bosire,et al.  “Women’s Three Bodies”: An Anthropological Perspective on Barriers to Safe Abortion Services in Kibera Informal Settlements, Nairobi, Kenya , 2019, Journal of Maternal and Child Health.

[6]  Manas Ranjan Pradhan,et al.  The incidence of abortion and unintended pregnancy in India, 2015 , 2018, The Lancet. Global health.

[7]  J. Jerman,et al.  Barriers to Abortion Care and Their Consequences For Patients Traveling for Services: Qualitative Findings from Two States , 2017, Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health.

[8]  Practice Bulletin No. 163: Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy , 2016, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  Practice Bulletin No. 135: Second-Trimester Abortion , 2013, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  K. Abawi Standards for maternal and neonatal care , 2013 .

[11]  Sujian Li,et al.  Prevalence of birth defects and risk-factor analysis from a population-based survey in Inner Mongolia, China , 2012, BMC Pediatrics.

[12]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Challenges in the diagnosis of fetal non‐chromosomal abnormalities at 11–13 weeks , 2011, Prenatal diagnosis.

[13]  I. Ben‐Ami,et al.  Termination of Pregnancy due to Fetal Abnormalities Performed after 23 Weeks’ Gestation: Analysis of Indications in 144 Cases from a Single Medical Center , 2009, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy.

[14]  A. Ballantyne,et al.  Prenatal Diagnosis and Abortion for Congenital Abnormalities: Is It Ethical to Provide One Without the Other? , 2009, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[15]  S. Gerber,et al.  Pregnant women with fetal abnormalities: the forgotten people in the abortion debate , 2008, The Medical journal of Australia.

[16]  S. Dalvie Second Trimester Abortions in India , 2008, Reproductive health matters.

[17]  S. Lalitkumar,et al.  Second Trimester Medical Abortion with Mifepristone–Misoprostol and Misoprostol Alone: A Review of Methods and Management , 2008, Reproductive health matters.

[18]  J. Savulescu,et al.  Pregnant women with fetal abnormalities: the forgotten people in the abortion debate , 2008, The Medical journal of Australia.

[19]  I. Shah,et al.  Induced abortion: estimated rates and trends worldwide , 2007, The Lancet.

[20]  Susheela Singh,et al.  Timing of steps and reasons for delays in obtaining abortions in the United States. , 2006, Contraception.

[21]  R. Duggal,et al.  The Abortion Assessment Project—India: Key Findings and Recommendations , 2004, Reproductive health matters.

[22]  K. Iyengar,et al.  Elective Abortion as a Primary Health Service in Rural India: Experience with Manual Vacuum Aspiration , 2002, Reproductive health matters.

[23]  Manas Ranjan Pradhan,et al.  Abortion and Unintended Pregnancy in Six Indian States: Findings and Implications for Policies and Programs , 2018 .

[24]  D. Hawks The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) , 2014 .

[25]  [Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; epidemiological survey, November 16 - 29, 1952]. , 1953, Revue medicale de Liege.