Delineation of two multi-invasion-induced rearrangement pathways that differently affect genome stability

Punctuated bursts of structural genomic variations (SVs) have been described in various organisms, but their etiology remains incompletely understood. Homologous recombination (HR) is a template-guided mechanism of repair of DNA double-strand breaks and stalled or collapsed replication forks. We recently identified a DNA break amplification and genome rearrangement pathway originating from the endonucleolytic processing of a multi-invasion (MI) DNA joint molecule formed during HR. Genome-wide sequencing approaches confirmed that multi-invasion-induced rearrangement (MIR) frequently leads to several repeat-mediated SVs and aneuploidies. Using molecular and genetic analysis, and a novel, highly sensitive proximity ligation-based assay for chromosomal rearrangement quantification, we further delineate two MIR sub-pathways. MIR1 is a universal pathway occurring in any sequence context, which generates secondary breaks and frequently leads to additional SVs. MIR2 occurs only if recombining donors exhibit substantial homology, and results in sequence insertion without additional break or SV. The most detrimental MIR1 pathway occurs late on a subset of persisting DNA joint molecules in a PCNA/Polδ-independent manner, unlike recombinational DNA synthesis. This work provides a refined mechanistic understanding of these HR-based SV formation pathways and shows that complex repeat-mediated SVs can occur without displacement DNA synthesis. Sequence signatures for inferring MIR1 from long-read data are proposed.

[1]  Lei S. Qi,et al.  Shuffling the yeast genome using CRISPR/Cas9-generated DSBs that target the transposable Ty1 elements , 2023, PLoS genetics.

[2]  W. Heyer,et al.  Detection of Homologous Recombination Intermediates via Proximity Ligation and Quantitative PCR in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2022, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[3]  Peter A. Audano,et al.  Transposable element-mediated rearrangements are prevalent in human genomes , 2022, bioRxiv.

[4]  J. Korbel,et al.  Structural Variation in Cancer: Role, Prevalence, and Mechanisms. , 2022, Annual review of genomics and human genetics.

[5]  L. Symington,et al.  Mechanism for inverted-repeat recombination induced by a replication fork barrier , 2022, Nature communications.

[6]  Piero Carninci,et al.  Recombination of repeat elements generates somatic complexity in human genomes , 2020, bioRxiv.

[7]  Aurèle Piazza,et al.  Recombination-mediated genome rearrangements. , 2021, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[8]  Erika Shor,et al.  DNA damage response of major fungal pathogen Candida glabrata offers clues to explain its genetic diversity , 2021, Current Genetics.

[9]  A. Thierry,et al.  Cohesin regulates homology search during recombinational DNA repair , 2020, Nature Cell Biology.

[10]  W. Heyer,et al.  Physical and Genetic Assays for the Study of DNA Joint Molecules Metabolism and Multi-invasion-Induced Rearrangements in S. cerevisiae. , 2020, Methods in molecular biology.

[11]  Evan E. Eichler,et al.  Long-read human genome sequencing and its applications , 2020, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[12]  K. T. Nishant,et al.  Characterization of systemic genomic instability in budding yeast , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Ruth A. Watson,et al.  Punctuated Aneuploidization of the Budding Yeast Genome , 2020, bioRxiv.

[14]  N. Hunter,et al.  PCNA activates the MutLγ endonuclease to promote meiotic crossing over , 2020, bioRxiv.

[15]  Icgc,et al.  Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes , 2017, bioRxiv.

[16]  S. Keeney,et al.  Molecular structures and mechanisms of DNA break processing in mouse meiosis , 2019, bioRxiv.

[17]  T. Kunkel,et al.  DNA Polymerase Delta Synthesizes Both Strands during Break-Induced Replication. , 2019, Molecular cell.

[18]  W. Heyer,et al.  Moving forward one step back at a time: reversibility during homologous recombination , 2019, Current Genetics.

[19]  W. Heyer,et al.  Dynamic Processing of Displacement Loops During Recombinational DNA Repair , 2018, bioRxiv.

[20]  G. Fischer,et al.  Reshuffling yeast chromosomes with CRISPR/Cas9 , 2018, bioRxiv.

[21]  W. Heyer,et al.  Multi‐Invasion‐Induced Rearrangements as a Pathway for Physiological and Pathological Recombination , 2018, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[22]  W. Heyer,et al.  A Proximity Ligation-Based Method for Quantitative Measurement of D-Loop Extension in S. cerevisiae. , 2018, Methods in enzymology.

[23]  S. West,et al.  Dopamine D4 receptor, but not the ADHD-associated D4.7 variant, forms functional heteromers with the dopamine D2S receptor in the brain , 2011, Molecular Psychiatry.

[24]  Ryan L. Collins,et al.  Multi-platform discovery of haplotype-resolved structural variation in human genomes , 2017, bioRxiv.

[25]  W. Heyer,et al.  Multi-invasions Are Recombination Byproducts that Induce Chromosomal Rearrangements , 2017, Cell.

[26]  R. Kolodner,et al.  Pathways and Mechanisms that Prevent Genome Instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2017, Genetics.

[27]  W. Heyer,et al.  Srs2 promotes synthesis-dependent strand annealing by disrupting DNA polymerase δ-extending D-loops , 2017, eLife.

[28]  Eleni P. Mimitou,et al.  A global view of meiotic double-strand break end resection , 2016, Science.

[29]  M. McVey,et al.  Eukaryotic DNA Polymerases in Homologous Recombination. , 2016, Annual review of genetics.

[30]  Gun Ho Jang,et al.  A renewed model of pancreatic cancer evolution based on genomic rearrangement patterns , 2016, Nature.

[31]  H. Araki,et al.  iAID: an improved auxin‐inducible degron system for the construction of a ‘tight’ conditional mutant in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2015, Yeast.

[32]  F. Machín,et al.  Mus81-Mms4 and Yen1 resolve a novel anaphase bridge formed by noncanonical Holliday junctions , 2014, Nature Communications.

[33]  J. Haber,et al.  Chromosome rearrangements via template switching between diverged repeated sequences , 2014, Genes & development.

[34]  Stephen C. West,et al.  Holliday junction resolution: Regulation in space and time , 2014, DNA repair.

[35]  W. Heyer,et al.  Rad54 functions as a heteroduplex DNA pump modulated by its DNA substrates and Rad51 during D loop formation. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[36]  L. Symington,et al.  Template Switching During Break-Induced Replication Is Promoted by the Mph1 Helicase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2014, Genetics.

[37]  Yi Zhou,et al.  Quantitation of DNA double-strand break resection intermediates in human cells , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[38]  J. Haber,et al.  Break-induced DNA replication. , 2013, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[39]  L. Symington,et al.  Mph1 and Mus81-Mms4 prevent aberrant processing of mitotic recombination intermediates. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[40]  T. Shibata,et al.  Putative antirecombinase Srs2 DNA helicase promotes noncrossover homologous recombination avoiding loss of heterozygosity , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Anna Malkova,et al.  Migrating bubble during break-induced replication drives conservative DNA synthesis , 2013, Nature.

[42]  L. Symington,et al.  Break-induced replication occurs by conservative DNA synthesis , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  Hengshan Zhang,et al.  Gene Copy-Number Variation in Haploid and Diploid Strains of the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2013, Genetics.

[44]  S. Gangloff,et al.  Srs2 mediates PCNA-SUMO-dependent inhibition of DNA repair synthesis , 2013, The EMBO journal.

[45]  J. Haber,et al.  Mutations arising during repair of chromosome breaks. , 2012, Annual review of genetics.

[46]  A. Aguilera,et al.  Complex Chromosomal Rearrangements Mediated by Break-Induced Replication Involve Structure-Selective Endonucleases , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[47]  M. Kupiec,et al.  The Rad1–Rad10 nuclease promotes chromosome translocations between dispersed repeats , 2012, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[48]  S. Kowalczykowski,et al.  Single-Molecule Imaging of DNA Pairing by RecA Reveals a 3-Dimensional Homology Search , 2011, Nature.

[49]  Yunmei Ma,et al.  Temporally and biochemically distinct activities of Exo1 during meiosis: double-strand break resection and resolution of double Holliday junctions. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[50]  L. Symington,et al.  Mus81 and Yen1 promote reciprocal exchange during mitotic recombination to maintain genome integrity in budding yeast. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[51]  Maitreya J. Dunham,et al.  Competitive Repair by Naturally Dispersed Repetitive DNA during Non-Allelic Homologous Recombination , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[52]  S. Gangloff,et al.  Stable interactions between DNA polymerase δ catalytic and structural subunits are essential for efficient DNA repair. , 2010, DNA repair.

[53]  W. Heyer,et al.  PCNA is required for initiation of recombination-associated DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase delta. , 2009, Molecular cell.

[54]  A. Aguilera,et al.  Chromosomal Translocations Caused by Either Pol32-Dependent or Pol32-Independent Triparental Break-Induced Replication , 2009, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[55]  L. Symington,et al.  Aberrant Double-Strand Break Repair Resulting in Half Crossovers in Mutants Defective for Rad51 or the DNA Polymerase δ Complex , 2009, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[56]  Eleni P. Mimitou,et al.  Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing , 2008, Nature.

[57]  Sang Eun Lee,et al.  Sgs1 Helicase and Two Nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 Resect DNA Double-Strand Break Ends , 2008, Cell.

[58]  Romain Koszul,et al.  Segmental Duplications Arise from Pol32-Dependent Repair of Broken Forks through Two Alternative Replication-Based Mechanisms , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[59]  P. Mieczkowski,et al.  Double-strand breaks associated with repetitive DNA can reshape the genome , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[60]  A. Malkova,et al.  Defective Break-Induced Replication Leads to Half-Crossovers in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2008, Genetics.

[61]  J. Haber,et al.  Break-induced replication and telomerase-independent telomere maintenance require Pol32 , 2007, Nature.

[62]  F. Fabre,et al.  Mrc1 and Srs2 are major actors in the regulation of spontaneous crossover , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[63]  A. Carr,et al.  Gross Chromosomal Rearrangements and Elevated Recombination at an Inducible Site-Specific Replication Fork Barrier , 2005, Cell.

[64]  V. Lundblad,et al.  Preparation of Yeast Media , 1993, Current protocols in molecular biology.

[65]  M. Kupiec,et al.  The Relationship between Homology Length and Crossing Over during the Repair of a Broken Chromosome* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[66]  L. Hartwell,et al.  CDC5 and CKII Control Adaptation to the Yeast DNA Damage Checkpoint , 1997, Cell.

[67]  J. Haber,et al.  Removal of nonhomologous DNA ends in double-strand break recombination: the role of the yeast ultraviolet repair gene RAD1. , 1992, Science.

[68]  A. Yeung,et al.  Alkali reversal of psoralen cross-link for the targeted delivery of psoralen monoadduct lesion. , 1988, Biochemistry.

[69]  Jack W. Szostak,et al.  The double-strand-break repair model for recombination , 1983, Cell.