The effect of bracing on varus gonarthrosis.

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to compare a custom-made valgus-producing functional knee (unloader) brace, a neoprene sleeve, and medical treatment only (control group) with regard to their ability to improve the disease-specific quality of life and the functional status of patients who had osteoarthritis in association with a varus deformity of the knee (varus gonarthrosis). METHODS The study design was a prospective, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial. Patients who had varus gonarthrosis were screened for eligibility. The criteria for exclusion included arthritides other than osteoarthritis; an operation on the knee within the previous six months; symptomatic disease of the hip, ankle, or foot; a previous fracture of the tibia or femur; morbid obesity (a body-mass index of more than thirty-five kilograms per square meter); skin disease; peripheral vascular disease or varicose veins that would preclude use of a brace; a severe cardiovascular deficit; blindness; poor English-language skills; and an inability to apply a brace because of physical limitations such as arthritis in the hand or an inability to bend over. Treatment was assigned on the basis of a computer-generated block method of randomization with use of sealed envelopes. The patients were stratified according to age (less than fifty years or at least fifty years), deformity (the mechanical axis in less than 5 degrees of varus or in at least 5 degrees of varus), and the status of the anterior cruciate ligament (torn or intact). The patients were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: medical treatment only (control group), medical treatment and use of a neoprene sleeve, or medical treatment and use of an unloader brace. The disease-specific quality of life was measured with use of the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the McMaster-Toronto Arthritis Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire (MACTAR), and function was assessed with use of the six-minute walking and thirty-second stair-climbing tests. The primary outcome measure consisted of an analysis of covariance of the change in scores between the baseline and six-month evaluations. RESULTS One hundred and nineteen patients were randomized. The control group consisted of forty patients (thirty-one men and nine women; mean age, 60.9 years); the neoprene-sleeve group, of thirty-eight patients (twenty-seven men and eleven women; mean age, 58.2 years); and the unloader-brace group, of forty-one patients (twenty-eight men and thirteen women; mean age, 59.5 years). Nine patients withdrew from the study. At the six-month follow-up evaluation, there was a significant improvement in the disease-specific quality of life (p = 0.001) and in function (p< or =0.001) in both the neoprene-sleeve group and the unloader-brace group compared with the control group. There was a significant difference between the unloader-brace group and the neoprene-sleeve group with regard to pain after both the six-minute walking test (p = 0.021) and the thirty-second stair-climbing test (p = 0.016). There was a strong trend toward a significant difference between the unloader-brace group and the neoprene-sleeve group with regard to the change in the WOMAC aggregate (p = 0.062) and WOMAC physical function scores (p = 0.081). CONCLUSIONS The results indicate that patients who have varus gonarthrosis may benefit significantly from use of a knee brace in addition to standard medical treatment. The unloader brace was, on the average, more effective than the neoprene sleeve. The ideal candidates for each of these bracing options remain to be identified.

[1]  F. Noyes,et al.  Decrease in knee joint pain and increase in function in patients with medial compartment arthrosis: a prospective analysis of valgus bracing. , 1998, Orthopedics.

[2]  T P Andriacchi,et al.  Joint Loading With Valgus Bracing in Patients With Varus Gonarthrosis , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  Y. Pai,et al.  Is knee joint proprioception worse in the arthritic knee versus the unaffected knee in unilateral knee osteoarthritis? , 1997, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[4]  H. Matsuno,et al.  Generation II knee bracing for severe medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  M. Prymka,et al.  Beeinflussung der propriozeptiven Fähigkeit von Kniegelenken mit einer primären Gonarthrose , 1997, Der Unfallchirurg.

[6]  R. Bourne,et al.  What Is the Best Way of Assessing Outcome After Total Knee Replacement? , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  R. Barrack,et al.  Proprioception After Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  R. Marks Further evidence of impaired position sense in knee osteoarthritis. , 1996, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.

[9]  P J McNair,et al.  Knee bracing: effects of proprioception. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  Gordon Fick,et al.  The Effect of Elastic Bandages on Human Knee Proprioception in the Uninjured Population , 1995, The American journal of sports medicine.

[11]  A Laupacis,et al.  The effect of elective total hip replacement on health-related quality of life. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  R. Loomer,et al.  Valgus Knee Bracing for Medical Gonarthrosis , 1993 .

[13]  K. Brandt Should osteoarthritis be treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs? , 1993, Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America.

[14]  J Hicks,et al.  Quantitative effects of physical therapy on muscular and functional performance in subjects with osteoarthritis of the knees. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  K. Lorig,et al.  Evidence suggesting that health education for self-management in patients with chronic arthritis has sustained health benefits while reducing health care costs. , 1993, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[16]  M. Weinberger,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of increased telephone contact for patients with osteoarthritis. A randomized, controlled trial. , 1993, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[17]  J P Allegrante,et al.  Supervised Fitness Walking in Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Knee , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[18]  A. Jones,et al.  The treatment of osteoarthritis. , 1992, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[19]  D. Felson,et al.  Weight Loss Reduces the Risk for Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis in Women , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[20]  F. Noyes,et al.  Preoperative planning for high tibial osteotomy. The effect of lateral tibiofemoral separation and tibiofemoral length. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  N. Bellamy,et al.  Double blind randomized controlled trial of sodium meclofenamate (Meclomen) and diclofenac sodium (Voltaren): post validation reapplication of the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index. , 1992, The Journal of rheumatology.

[22]  K. Brandt,et al.  Comparison of an antiinflammatory dose of ibuprofen, an analgesic dose of ibuprofen, and acetaminophen in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  D R Pendergast,et al.  Muscle rehabilitation: its effect on muscular and functional performance of patients with knee osteoarthritis. , 1991, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[24]  L. Melton,et al.  Idiopathic symptomatic osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: a population-based incidence study. , 1990, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[25]  C. Goldsmith,et al.  Signal measurement strategies: are they feasible and do they offer any advantage in outcome measurement in osteoarthritis? , 1990, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[26]  J E Hewett,et al.  Efficacy of physical conditioning exercise in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. , 1989, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[27]  J. Silverfield,et al.  Intra-articular orgotein in osteoarthritis of the knee: a placebo-controlled efficacy, safety, and dosage comparison. , 1989, The American journal of medicine.

[28]  C. Goldsmith,et al.  Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. , 1988, The Journal of rheumatology.

[29]  N. Bellamy,et al.  Validation study of WOMAC : a health status instrument for measuring clinically-important patient-relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis , 1988 .

[30]  K. Yasuda,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the treatment of osteoarthritic knees using a newly designed wedged insole. , 1987, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[31]  P Tugwell,et al.  The MACTAR Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire--an individualized functional priority approach for assessing improvement in physical disability in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1987, The Journal of rheumatology.

[32]  K. Yasuda,et al.  The mechanics of treatment of the osteoarthritic knee with a wedged insole. , 1987, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[33]  J. Kelsey,et al.  Epidemiology of musculoskeletal impairments and associated disability. , 1984, American journal of public health.

[34]  H. Skinner,et al.  Effect of articular disease and total knee arthroplasty on knee joint-position sense. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  J. Kellgren,et al.  Radiological Assessment of Osteo-Arthrosis , 1957, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.