Food Miles or Carbon Emissions? Exploring Labelling Preference for Food Transport Footprint with a Stated Choice Study

The ecological footprint of food transport can be communicated using carbon dioxide emissions (CO label) or by providing information about both the length of time and the mileage travelled (food miles label). We use stated choice data to estimate conventional unobserved taste heterogeneity models and extend them to a specification that also addresses attribute nonattendance. The implied posterior distributions of the marginal willingness to pay values are compared graphically and are used in validation regressions. We find strong bimodality of taste distribution as the emerging feature, with different groups of subjects having low and high valuations for these labels. The best fitting model shows that CO and food miles valuations are much correlated. CO valuations can be high even for those respondents expressing low valuations for food miles. However, the reverse is not true. Taken together, the results suggest that consumers tend to value the CO label at least as much and sometimes more than the food miles label.

[1]  Wim Verbeke,et al.  Consumers’ valuation of sustainability labels on meat , 2014 .

[2]  Wim Verbeke,et al.  European consumer preferences for beef with nutrition and health claims: A multi-country investigation using discrete choice experiments , 2014 .

[3]  Roger H. von Haefen,et al.  Incorporating Observed Choice into the Construction of Welfare Measures from Random Utility Models , 2013 .

[4]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Non-attendance to attributes in environmental choice analysis: a latent class specification , 2011 .

[5]  Benjamin L. Campbell,et al.  Revisiting Cheap Talk with New Evidence from a Field Experiment , 2011 .

[6]  D. McFadden,et al.  Does Local Labeling Complement or Compete with Other Sustainable Labels? A Conjoint Analysis of Direct and Joint Values for Fresh Produce Claim , 2011 .

[7]  Brian C. Briggeman,et al.  Preferences for fairness and equity in the food system , 2011 .

[8]  David K. Holdsworth,et al.  Food miles: Do UK consumers actually care? , 2010 .

[9]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Monitoring Choice Task Attribute Attendance in Nonmarket Valuation of Multiple Park Management Services: Does It Matter? , 2010, Land Economics.

[10]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Modelling attribute non-attendance in choice experiments for rural landscape valuation , 2009 .

[11]  David Coley,et al.  Local food, food miles and carbon emissions: a comparison of farm shop and mass distribution approaches. , 2009 .

[12]  G. Grolleau,et al.  Do consumers care about food miles? An empirical analysis in France , 2008 .

[13]  H. S. Matthews,et al.  Food-miles and the relative climate impacts of food choices in the United States. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Riccardo Scarpa,et al.  Incorporating Discontinuous Preferences into the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments , 2008 .

[15]  G. Seyfang.  Ecological Citizenship and Sustainable Consumption: Examining Local Organic Food Networks. , 2006 .

[16]  D. Hensher.  How do respondents process stated choice experiments? Attribute consideration under varying information load , 2006 .

[17]  R. Scarpa,et al.  Destination Choice Models for Rock Climbing in the Northeastern Alps: A Latent-Class Approach Based on Intensity of Preferences , 2005, Land Economics.

[18]  Alan Campbell McKinnon,et al.  The validity of food miles as an indicator of sustainable development - final report , 2005 .

[19]  M. Blanke,et al.  Food (miles) for Thought - Energy Balance for Locally-grown versus Imported Apple Fruit (3 pp) , 2005, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[20]  Tim Lang,et al.  Farm costs and food miles: an assessment of the full cost of the UK weekly food basket , 2005 .

[21]  Riccardo Scarpa,et al.  Individual-specific welfare measures for public goods: a latent class approach to residential customers of Yorkshire Water , 2005 .

[22]  J. Lusk,et al.  Effects of Cheap Talk on Consumer Willingness‐To‐Pay for Golden Rice , 2003 .

[23]  T. Lang,et al.  Food Wars: The Global Battle for Mouths, Minds and Markets , 2003 .

[24]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[25]  A. Bowman,et al.  Applied smoothing techniques for data analysis : the kernel approach with S-plus illustrations , 1999 .

[26]  R. G. Cummings,et al.  Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method , 1999 .

[27]  K. Train,et al.  Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[28]  M. Odening,et al.  Proceedings of the 114th EAAE Seminar on Structural Change in Agriculture, Berlin, 2010. , 2012 .

[29]  A. Woodhouse.  Social Capital and Economic Development in Regional Australia: A Case Study. , 2006 .

[30]  José G. Dias,et al.  Latent Class Analysis and Model Selection , 2005, GfKl.

[31]  Riccardo Scarpa,et al.  Performance of Error Component Models for Status-Quo Effects in Choice Experiments , 2005 .

[32]  R. Pirog.  Ecolabel Value Assessment Phase II: Consumer Perceptions of Local Foods , 2004 .

[33]  Richard D. Deveaux,et al.  Applied Smoothing Techniques for Data Analysis , 1999, Technometrics.

[34]  S. Zadek,et al.  Social Labels: Tools for Ethical Trade , 1998 .

[35]  D. Bromley.  Handbook of environmental economics , 1995 .