The optimal control structure: an approach to measuring control-law nonlinearity

This paper introduces the Optimal Control Structure as a design tool to examine the control-law nonlinearity of a given process design. Control-law nonlinearity is defined as the optimal degree of nonlinear compensation in the controller, a system property distinct from open-loop nonlinearity. It is determined by the nature of the open-loop process, the performance objective, and the region of operation. The Optimal Control Structure contains the structural dynamics of the optimal control law, and an assessment of the control-law nonlinearity can be found from any open-loop nonlinearity measure of this structure that takes into account a region of operation. This approach is applied to three SISO models, demonstrating how the control-law nonlinearity for a given plant can vary with the cost of control action and performance objective.

[1]  Evanghelos Zafiriou,et al.  Robust process control , 1987 .

[2]  Tryphon T. Georgiou,et al.  The parallel projection operators of a nonlinear feedback system , 1993 .

[3]  D. Bernstein Nonquadratic cost and nonlinear feedback control , 1993 .

[4]  G. Carter,et al.  Estimation of the magnitude-squared coherence function via overlapped fast Fourier transform processing , 1973 .

[5]  T. F. Edgar,et al.  The Use of Approximate Models and Exact Linearization for Control of Nonlinear Processes , 1993, 1993 American Control Conference.

[6]  G. Carter Coherence and time delay estimation , 1987, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[7]  S. Norquay,et al.  Nonlinear Model Predictive Control of pH Neutralisation Using Wiener Models , 1996 .

[8]  Huibert Kwakernaak,et al.  Linear Optimal Control Systems , 1972 .

[9]  Johannes Schumacher,et al.  Proceedings of the European Control Conference , 1997 .

[10]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  Optimization approaches to nonlinear model predictive control , 1991 .

[11]  M. Morari,et al.  A normal form approach to approximate input-output linearization for maximum phase nonlinear SISO systems , 1996, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[12]  Thomas P. Krauss,et al.  Signal processing toolbox for use with MATLAB : ユーザーズガイド , 1994 .

[13]  Françoise Lamnabhi-Lagarrigue,et al.  A new approach to nonlinear optimal feedback law , 1986 .

[14]  V. Benignus Estimation of the coherence spectrum and its confidence interval using the fast Fourier transform , 1969 .

[15]  Stanley H. Johnson,et al.  Use of Hammerstein Models in Identification of Nonlinear Systems , 1991 .

[16]  Daniel E. Rivera,et al.  Closed-Loop System Identification of Restricted Complexity Models Using Iterative Refinement , 1993, 1993 American Control Conference.

[17]  Mitsuji Sampei,et al.  Approximate input-output linearization of nonlinear systems , 1987, 26th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[18]  Manfred Morari Effect of Design on the Controllability of Chemical Plants , 1992 .

[19]  Costas J. Spanos,et al.  Advanced process control , 1989 .

[20]  J. Bendat New techniques for nonlinear system analysis and identification from random data , 1990 .

[21]  Martin Guay,et al.  Measurement of nonlinearity in chemical process control systems: The steady state map , 1995 .