The Uncanny Valley: Effect of Realism on the Impression of Artificial Human Faces

Roboticists believe that people will have an unpleasant impression of a humanoid robot that has an almost, but not perfectly, realistic human appearance. This is called the uncanny valley, and is not limited to robots, but is also applicable to any type of human-like object, such as dolls, masks, facial caricatures, avatars in virtual reality, and characters in computer graphics movies. The present study investigated the uncanny valley by measuring observers' impressions of facial images whose degree of realism was manipulated by morphing between artificial and real human faces. Facial images yielded the most unpleasant impressions when they were highly realistic, supporting the hypothesis of the uncanny valley. However, the uncanny valley was confirmed only when morphed faces had abnormal features such as bizarre eyes. These results suggest that to have an almost perfectly realistic human appearance is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for the uncanny valley. The uncanny valley emerges only when there is also an abnormal feature.

[1]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  Gunter Loffler,et al.  Synthetic faces, face cubes, and the geometry of face space , 2002, Vision Research.

[3]  R. Yin.  Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[4]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[5]  Jasia Reichardt.  Robots: Fact, Fiction and Prediction , 1978 .

[6]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Attractiveness of Facial Averageness and Symmetry in Non-Western Cultures: In Search of Biologically Based Standards of Beauty , 2001, Perception.

[7]  S. Langton.  The Mutual Influence of Gaze and Head Orientation in the Analysis of Social Attention Direction , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[8]  Kikuo Fujimura,et al.  The intelligent ASIMO: system overview and integration , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[9]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Facial Attractiveness: Evolutionary, Cognitive, and Social Perspectives , 2001 .

[10]  C. Tyler,et al.  What makes Mona Lisa smile? , 2004, Vision Research.

[11]  Lola Cannery,et al.  I Show You how I Like You-Can You Read it in My Face , 2001 .

[12]  Futoshi Naya,et al.  Differences in effect of robot and screen agent recommendations on human decision-making , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[13]  T. Kanda,et al.  Can we talk to robots? Ten-month-old infants expected interactive humanoid robots to be talked to by persons , 2005, Cognition.

[14]  Chiara Turati,et al.  Why Faces Are Not Special to Newborns , 2004 .

[15]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Whose job is it anyway? a study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task , 2004 .

[16]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Gaze Perception Triggers Reflexive Visuospatial Orienting , 1999 .

[17]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Whose Job Is It Anyway? A Study of Human-Robot Interaction in a Collaborative Task , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[18]  Jessica K. Hodgins,et al.  Perception of Human Motion With Different Geometric Models , 1998, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[19]  Sarah N. Woods,et al.  The design space of robots: investigating children's views , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[20]  J. Hietanen.  Does your gaze direction and head orientation shift my visual attention? , 1999, Neuroreport.

[21]  A. Kingstone,et al.  The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze , 1998 .

[22]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads , 2002, DIS '02.

[23]  Stefan M. Grünvogel,et al.  How Realistic is Realism? Considerations on the Aesthetics of Computer Games , 2004, ICEC.

[24]  Marc Fabri,et al.  Mediating the expression of emotion in educational collaborative virtual environments: an experimental study , 2004, Virtual Reality.

[25]  Sharif Razzaque,et al.  The Responses of People to Virtual Humans in an Immersive Virtual Environment , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[26]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  When Is a Face Not a Face? The Effects of Misorientation on Mechanisms of Face Perception , 2003 .

[27]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  Development of an android robot for studying human-robot interaction , 2004 .

[28]  F. Hara.  Artificial emotion of face robot through learning in communicative interactions with human , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[29]  D. Norman.  Emotional design : why we love (or hate) everyday things , 2004 .

[30]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  Ruth S. Nagayama,et al.  The effect of torso direction on the judgement of eye direction , 2005 .

[32]  Lola Cañamero,et al.  I show you how I like you - can you read it in my face? [robotics] , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[33]  H. Kobayashi,et al.  Realization of realistic and rich facial expressions by face robot , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[34]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Emotion and sociable humanoid robots , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[35]  James W Tanaka,et al.  An Encoding Advantage for Own-Race versus Other-Race Faces , 2003, Perception.

[36]  Ruth Aylett.  Agents and Affect: Why Embodied Agents Need Affective Systems , 2004, SETN.

[37]  P. Ekman,et al.  Unmasking the face : a guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues , 1975 .

[38]  Jun'ichiro Seyama,et al.  Perceived Eye Size is Larger in Happy Faces than in Surprised Faces , 2002, Perception.